A generation ago, the IMF's prescription for fiscally/economically struggling economies was:
- Massively cut government spending and jack up taxes
- Devalue the exchange rate
- Sell-off all government-owned enterprises
- Eliminate all protections for domestic industry
In theory, all of these things were correct. The problem was that in between point A (things are really bad) and the theoretical point B (things will be much better!) there's a really tough road that includes soaring inflation and unemployment. That tends to p--- off population so much that it ends up tearing down the government in charge of the putting in place the IMF's reforms, and you're back to square one.
See what I'm getting to? In theory, all you need to do is tank, tank, tank until you land Shaq. Then voila! But between point A and point B, you've wrecked your organization's capacity to attract free agents, your GM's credibility in making trades, and your existing players' motivation to improve their games. Eventually, it brings down the very GM who concocted the plan in the first place.
This is the problem with Hinkie-ism. Sounds great. But this is the real world.