I'm getting annoyed with all the GM police whining. If you guys don't like the moves being made then stop your crybaby complaining and make your own. You all sound like the crybaby GM's who wha-wha'd when Pau Gasol was sent to the Lakers for nothing.
What's with this safety net on trades? If someone places value on a pick over another then so be it. ONe guy just traded his 1st, 2nd and 3rd round pick for a chance to pick top 5. Personally I thought that was a ridiculous trade, but I don't need half the league and the commish giving "tips" to the guy. My thought is Bravo on #5 for getting such great value for his pick. I applaud his GM'ing ability. Meanwhile, I just inquired on a top 7 pick and was told "It will cost you a 1st, 2nd and 3rd). I told the guy he was nuts and moved on (the equivalent to hanging up the phone). I don't need a safety net in the event I make a dumb decision. It negates the entire point of this game... to see which GM can build the best team. Additionally... right now we are just talking about theory and strategy. YOu're looking at numbers and not even actual talent. If a guy is willing to sacrifice his late 1st round pick, his 2nd round pick and his 3rd round pick... SO BE IT.... perhaps he is targeting a specific fellow (Kobe? KG? CP? Howard) and believes after nabbing that top 5 guy he'll be able to put him on the market and receive 4-5 guys for it. It's strategy folks. If his strategy is to take KG and then try to get Telfair, Big Al, Gomes, Gerald Green and a late round pick... so be it. I applaud his creativity.
It's a game. Lets play it and have fun. Last year we had some terrible trades... but look around the NBA and you'll see some terrible trades as well. This is a messageboard forum about the Celtics where everyone claims, "Man I could do a better job than ___" and people start dozens of trade threads for their input on what team A and team B should do. That's the concept this game is built around. So you think you can be an NBA GM?... well lets see...

I think the first time I see a trade "vetoed" that isn't clearly ridiculous (like LeBron for Tony Allen), I'll probably quit the thing. lol
Last point: When we get into the draft we are going to see some pretty dumb stuff too. If someone decides to take Paul Pierce over Kobe Bryant (hey 4-5 posters were arguing with me yesterday that Pierce clearly "outplayed" Kobe in the playoffs) are we going to "veto" that move too? Nah.... lettem play the game, folks.