This is silly. Are both individual moves legal within the rules of the league?... Then there is no reason to believe the league would stop either. And thus it doesn't matter if they are contingent in each other or not since the league has zero reason to reject either individually.
But I guess I see the thought process behind it. You couldn't submit two trades to the league... One bringing in deandre and one right after it that sends him to the blazers for the #10. That's why they have three team trades, I guess.
Is there no example of a team ever submitting two separate trades at the same time?... Or do they try to package them into one large trade. What about at the trade deadline where a team submits back-to-back trades at the wire.... One sending a player to the raptors and another sending a player to the mavericks. How is that really any different. Clearly they want both deals done and they both fit into their vision... If both trades involved sending out old vets for young players, wouldn't that be looked at as two deals "contingent" on each other?
I have to wonder if the bigger question is if Boston and the clippers have a handshake agreement for Boston NOT to trade pierce to a team in need of shedding cap space (like the mavs) and instead just buy him out. If Boston buys out pierce instead of trading him, that points to a conspiracy
i am most certainly not privy to the inside discussions in the nba, but i think the nba's point is that these two actions (kg for aj trade, and, doc being released from his contract for 2 picks) are connected since neither one would take place without the other taking place.
that is, if you asked the clips if they would trade for kg and not have doc involved, the answer is it would not happen since kg wont go without doc.
if you asked the clips would they ask the celtics to release doc for two first rounders WITHOUT having kg follow doc to LA, i think they would say "no thanks."
therefore, it would seem that each deal depends upon the existence of the other. and if so, they are joined. and if they are joined, they violate the CBA.
i can see what the nba is saying here, even if i don't like it.