Author Topic: GSW considering Ellis for Allen?  (Read 31117 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: GSW considering Ellis for Allen?
« Reply #30 on: January 25, 2010, 09:48:09 PM »

Offline Chris

  • Global Moderator
  • Dennis Johnson
  • ******************
  • Posts: 18008
  • Tommy Points: 642
I don't buy for a second that they would offer, or Danny would turn down Ellis and Radmanovic for Allen.  Danny would have accepted the offer before they finished saying it, and figured out the fit later. 

My guess is the other piece was actually Maggette, or the Warriors were looking for more than Ray...perhaps a package of Ray and Rondo for something like Ellis, Maggette, and Randolph. 

Re: GSW considering Ellis for Allen?
« Reply #31 on: January 25, 2010, 09:52:15 PM »

Offline Roy Hobbs

  • In The Rafters
  • The Natural
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 33333
  • Tommy Points: 6430
  • Doc could learn a thing or two from Norman Dale
I don't buy for a second that they would offer, or Danny would turn down Ellis and Radmanovic for Allen.  Danny would have accepted the offer before they finished saying it, and figured out the fit later.  

I'm not sure about that.  There's no secret about the fact that the Warriors aren't enamored with Ellis, and his contract is looking like a mistake at this point.  I don't think this is anywhere near a slam dunk for Boston, due to questions about Ellis' contract, attitude, defense, size, turnovers, etc.

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

Portland CrotoNats:  2009 CB Draft Champions

Re: GSW considering Ellis for Allen?
« Reply #32 on: January 25, 2010, 09:54:08 PM »

Offline Chris

  • Global Moderator
  • Dennis Johnson
  • ******************
  • Posts: 18008
  • Tommy Points: 642
I don't buy for a second that they would offer, or Danny would turn down Ellis and Radmanovic for Allen.  Danny would have accepted the offer before they finished saying it, and figured out the fit later.  

I'm not sure about that.  There's no secret about the fact that the Warriors aren't enamored with Ellis, and his contract is looking like a mistake at this point.  I don't think this is anywhere near a slam dunk for Boston, due to questions about Ellis' contract, attitude, defense, size, turnovers, etc.

It is a slamdunk value-wise.

More importantly, why would they be coming to Boston if all they wanted was an expiring contract.  Do you really think there are not a bunch of teams that would be interested in giving up an expiring contract for Ellis?

Re: GSW considering Ellis for Allen?
« Reply #33 on: January 25, 2010, 09:54:33 PM »

Offline Andy Jick

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3795
  • Tommy Points: 89
  • You know my methods, Watson.
This is one trade you have to think long and hard over...a number of pros and cons involved.  This I do know: whatever you do with Ray Allen has to be THE RIGHT THING.  He's really the linchpin of the "assets" that Danny possesses.  Danny screws a Ray Allen trade up, and it could cripple this franchise for years to come.  But if he pulls of a deal that gives this team a chance to compete for a title this season, and a valuable part of the future then he once again comes off looking like a genius.

I'm just not sure that Ellis is that guy...
"It was easier to know it than to explain why I know it."

Re: GSW considering Ellis for Allen?
« Reply #34 on: January 25, 2010, 09:57:19 PM »

Offline CoachBo

  • NCE
  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6069
  • Tommy Points: 336
Ellis and Vlad Rad is a "Wyc wants to cut payroll" move, and it stinks.

Ellis and Maggette for Ray and some of our expirings is something I'd take some time to mull over.

Anything else, like the original deal, is horrible.
Coined the CelticsBlog term, "Euromistake."

Re: GSW considering Ellis for Allen?
« Reply #35 on: January 25, 2010, 09:58:26 PM »

Offline Roy Hobbs

  • In The Rafters
  • The Natural
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 33333
  • Tommy Points: 6430
  • Doc could learn a thing or two from Norman Dale
I don't buy for a second that they would offer, or Danny would turn down Ellis and Radmanovic for Allen.  Danny would have accepted the offer before they finished saying it, and figured out the fit later.  

I'm not sure about that.  There's no secret about the fact that the Warriors aren't enamored with Ellis, and his contract is looking like a mistake at this point.  I don't think this is anywhere near a slam dunk for Boston, due to questions about Ellis' contract, attitude, defense, size, turnovers, etc.

It is a slamdunk value-wise.

More importantly, why would they be coming to Boston if all they wanted was an expiring contract.  Do you really think there are not a bunch of teams that would be interested in giving up an expiring contract for Ellis?

I think a lot of teams would be very hesitant to take on five more years for a player with so many question marks.  Plus, the rumor is a team would be required to take on another contract, which makes some sense.

It's the same thing with Iguodala in Philadelphia.  You wouldn't think he'd be available in a salary dump, but apparently he is.  Teams are regretting give big money, long term deals to players they can't build around.

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

Portland CrotoNats:  2009 CB Draft Champions

Re: GSW considering Ellis for Allen?
« Reply #36 on: January 25, 2010, 10:22:59 PM »

Offline WeMadeIt17

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3397
  • Tommy Points: 435
People say he is a bad shooter are out of their minds. He shoots 46% and that is pretty good for all of the shots he takes. Gets 2 steals a game as well. I am not saying he is the perfect fit because trading Ray hurts the Chemistry and everything but if we could trade Ray and a future pick for Ellis and Raja I dont know if you can turn that down. Ellis is a sick scorer and something we could use off the bench and have Raja start because of his D.

Re: GSW considering Ellis for Allen?
« Reply #37 on: January 25, 2010, 10:23:44 PM »

Offline guava_wrench

  • Satch Sanders
  • *********
  • Posts: 9931
  • Tommy Points: 777
Ellis and Vlad Rad is a "Wyc wants to cut payroll" move, and it stinks.

Ellis and Maggette for Ray and some of our expirings is something I'd take some time to mull over.

Anything else, like the original deal, is horrible.
How is it a cutting payroll move considering Ellis' contract?

Interesting, but risky move. He is one heck of a scorer.

Re: GSW considering Ellis for Allen?
« Reply #38 on: January 25, 2010, 10:25:26 PM »

Offline jdpapa3

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3884
  • Tommy Points: 85
http://www.82games.com/0910/0910GSW.HTM

Scariest thing about him is that the Warriors are WAYYY better when he is not on the floor.

Re: GSW considering Ellis for Allen?
« Reply #39 on: January 25, 2010, 10:26:50 PM »

Offline Fafnir

  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30863
  • Tommy Points: 1330
http://www.82games.com/0910/0910GSW.HTM

Scariest thing about him is that the Warriors are WAYYY better when he is not on the floor.
He's averaging 42 minutes a game, so the raw on/off court numbers cannot be taken at face value. Two sample sizes that are way out of wack.

Re: GSW considering Ellis for Allen?
« Reply #40 on: January 25, 2010, 10:31:43 PM »

Offline More Banners

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3845
  • Tommy Points: 257
I'm not sure Ellis is the guy...actually, he's probably not.  I'd rather a bigger player at the 2.

I do think that Danny will continue to say that he likes the current roster, and he will keep his cell phone on right up to the deadline as teams call with offers that include Ray's contract (which is what teams want, not the player).  I think Danny's a pretty savvy guy, Mikki Moore aside.

That said, Ellis has the kind of contract that I think we might expect to take on for the starting unit:  not a max deal, but a very talented starter in that 10-11 million range.  A team could be built that would be very talented at all positions, and deep, if a team can avoid dishing out the max for any one player.

Re: GSW considering Ellis for Allen?
« Reply #41 on: January 25, 2010, 10:32:27 PM »

Offline Brickowski

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4207
  • Tommy Points: 423
I would turn down Ellis and VladRad.  I would demand Bell instead.

Yes, Ellis has question marks.  So Does Ray Allen because of his age.

Actually I would prefer Iguodala, but Philly is highly unlikely to trade him within the division.

Re: GSW considering Ellis for Allen?
« Reply #42 on: January 25, 2010, 10:32:47 PM »

Offline jdpapa3

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3884
  • Tommy Points: 85
http://www.82games.com/0910/0910GSW.HTM

Scariest thing about him is that the Warriors are WAYYY better when he is not on the floor.
He's averaging 42 minutes a game, so the raw on/off court numbers cannot be taken at face value. Two sample sizes that are way out of wack.

Good point. The guy never sits. But when you consider 6 minutes * 42 or so games, the sample size is decent.

To your side, the last time he was healthy 07-08, he showed pretty well in this metric.

Re: GSW considering Ellis for Allen?
« Reply #43 on: January 25, 2010, 10:33:50 PM »

Offline Rtpas11

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 803
  • Tommy Points: 76
I don't understand this trade if they already have Raja Bell, unless they're trying to free up cap space. I rather this trade though... http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=yky3esu  ;D

Re: GSW considering Ellis for Allen?
« Reply #44 on: January 25, 2010, 10:39:52 PM »

Offline RAcker

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3892
  • Tommy Points: 69
  • Law mercy!
I would turn down Ellis and VladRad.  I would demand Bell instead.

Yes, Ellis has question marks.  So Does Ray Allen because of his age.

Actually I would prefer Iguodala, but Philly is highly unlikely to trade him within the division.
Any way we can pull a 3-way deal with Philly and GSW?  Ehhh.

I still hesitate to move Ray.  I don't envy Danny when this stuff comes up.