Author Topic: Shams: Porzingis to Boston?  (Read 172454 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Shams: Porzingis to Boston?
« Reply #690 on: June 22, 2023, 04:04:11 AM »

Offline JSD

  • NCE
  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12590
  • Tommy Points: 2159
I'm fine with not having a handshake agreement in place. Ultimately, Zinger is receiving a substantial payment for one year. It's a great opportunity to test if everything goes well. If it doesn't work out, the Celtics can easily move on. The trade involves Marcus Smart for two first-round picks and a trial period with Kristaps Porziņģis, and I approve of it.

Marcus held a significant influence in the locker room and had seniority over Tatum and Brown. I anticipate that Tatum will now fill that role. This team belongs to him now. He's the only player who is off-limits.

Re: Shams: Porzingis to Boston?
« Reply #691 on: June 22, 2023, 04:05:46 AM »

Offline cman88

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5530
  • Tommy Points: 397
Listening to Bill Simmons podcast they are talking like this a one year rental? That doesn’t make me feel any better considering Smart was on a better contract with years left. If this was simply a dart board cost cutting trade I officially don’t like it. This flops next year then Brown is on the chopping block. This is a bigger risk than a lot of people are thinking about.

mark stein said they are talking about Extending Porzingis. this isn't a one year cost cutting move...

I would think there already is a handshake deal in place for an extension. Brad wouldn’t risk doing this trade if it wasn’t the case. It would be interesting to see if JB will get the supermax. In Mike Zarren we trust.

Brown is definitely getting the supermax

Re: Shams: Porzingis to Boston?
« Reply #692 on: June 22, 2023, 04:12:43 AM »

Offline JSD

  • NCE
  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12590
  • Tommy Points: 2159
Listening to Bill Simmons podcast they are talking like this a one year rental? That doesn’t make me feel any better considering Smart was on a better contract with years left. If this was simply a dart board cost cutting trade I officially don’t like it. This flops next year then Brown is on the chopping block. This is a bigger risk than a lot of people are thinking about.

mark stein said they are talking about Extending Porzingis. this isn't a one year cost cutting move...

I would think there already is a handshake deal in place for an extension. Brad wouldn’t risk doing this trade if it wasn’t the case. It would be interesting to see if JB will get the supermax. In Mike Zarren we trust.

Brown is definitely getting the supermax

Why? Is Brown more interested in successful or solely focused on maximizing his earnings? If the Celtics don't offer him the super max and he becomes a free agent, he would receive a conventional maximum contract for four years. So, what if the Celtics offered him a little more than a conventional maximum contract for five years instead, enabling them to allocate funds towards acquiring other talented players and maintaining the team's competitiveness? This is an aspect that both Brown and Tatum should contemplate.

Re: Shams: Porzingis to Boston?
« Reply #693 on: June 22, 2023, 04:14:02 AM »

Offline goCeltics

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1922
  • Tommy Points: 71
 I think the c's may be tear down mode if they fall short next year.

Re: Shams: Porzingis to Boston?
« Reply #694 on: June 22, 2023, 04:17:27 AM »

Offline CelticSooner

  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11884
  • Tommy Points: 902
  • GOT IT!!!
I'm fine with not having a handshake agreement in place. Ultimately, Zinger is receiving a substantial payment for one year. It's a great opportunity to test if everything goes well. If it doesn't work out, the Celtics can easily move on. The trade involves Marcus Smart for two first-round picks and a trial period with Kristaps Porziņģis, and I approve of it.

Marcus held a significant influence in the locker room and had seniority over Tatum and Brown. I anticipate that Tatum will now fill that role. This team belongs to him now. He's the only player who is off-limits.

If things don’t work out the C’s can move on by trading him somewhere else. Extend him immediately and I’ll feel better about the trade. The asset is the most important thing here.

Re: Shams: Porzingis to Boston?
« Reply #695 on: June 22, 2023, 04:22:23 AM »

Offline JSD

  • NCE
  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12590
  • Tommy Points: 2159
I'm fine with not having a handshake agreement in place. Ultimately, Zinger is receiving a substantial payment for one year. It's a great opportunity to test if everything goes well. If it doesn't work out, the Celtics can easily move on. The trade involves Marcus Smart for two first-round picks and a trial period with Kristaps Porziņģis, and I approve of it.

Marcus held a significant influence in the locker room and had seniority over Tatum and Brown. I anticipate that Tatum will now fill that role. This team belongs to him now. He's the only player who is off-limits.

If things don’t work out the C’s can move on by trading him somewhere else. Extend him immediately and I’ll feel better about the trade. The asset is the most important thing here.

If things don't go as planned, you still have the option to sign and trade him. What if Porziņģis gets a major injury? Then he becomes impossible to trade, and you'll have a maximum contract that sits unused, taking up all your available salary cap space after Tatum and Brown. That would be bad

Re: Shams: Porzingis to Boston?
« Reply #696 on: June 22, 2023, 04:39:41 AM »

Offline gouki88

  • NCE
  • Red Auerbach
  • *******************************
  • Posts: 31552
  • Tommy Points: 3142
  • 2019 & 2021 CS Historical Draft Champion
Listening to Bill Simmons podcast they are talking like this a one year rental? That doesn’t make me feel any better considering Smart was on a better contract with years left. If this was simply a dart board cost cutting trade I officially don’t like it. This flops next year then Brown is on the chopping block. This is a bigger risk than a lot of people are thinking about.
How is it such a big risk? We have a huge asset to dangle teams in the form of a big time expiring contract (if it doesn’t work out), as well as the prospect of adding some good young talent over the next 12 months. If it does work out, we’re the best team in the East
'23 Historical Draft: Orlando Magic.

PG: Terry Porter (90-91) / Steve Francis (00-01)
SG: Joe Dumars (92-93) / Jeff Hornacek (91-92) / Jerry Stackhouse (00-01)
SF: Brandon Roy (08-09) / Walter Davis (78-79)
PF: Terry Cummings (84-85) / Paul Millsap (15-16)
C: Chris Webber (00-01) / Ralph Sampson (83-84) / Andrew Bogut (09-10)

Re: Shams: Porzingis to Boston?
« Reply #697 on: June 22, 2023, 04:55:20 AM »

Offline knuckleballer

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6368
  • Tommy Points: 664
I think the c's may be tear down mode if they fall short next year.

Not with Tatum in his prime.

Re: Shams: Porzingis to Boston?
« Reply #698 on: June 22, 2023, 05:04:07 AM »

Offline CelticSooner

  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11884
  • Tommy Points: 902
  • GOT IT!!!
Listening to Bill Simmons podcast they are talking like this a one year rental? That doesn’t make me feel any better considering Smart was on a better contract with years left. If this was simply a dart board cost cutting trade I officially don’t like it. This flops next year then Brown is on the chopping block. This is a bigger risk than a lot of people are thinking about.
How is it such a big risk? We have a huge asset to dangle teams in the form of a big time expiring contract (if it doesn’t work out), as well as the prospect of adding some good young talent over the next 12 months. If it does work out, we’re the best team in the East

The post above just answered that question. Those young players will never develop on a contender. They will end up complaining about playing time like Pritchard currently does if they actually pan out. Proven vets and ring chasers should be the goal at the end of the bench anyways.

Re: Shams: Porzingis to Boston?
« Reply #699 on: June 22, 2023, 05:14:20 AM »

Offline gouki88

  • NCE
  • Red Auerbach
  • *******************************
  • Posts: 31552
  • Tommy Points: 3142
  • 2019 & 2021 CS Historical Draft Champion
Listening to Bill Simmons podcast they are talking like this a one year rental? That doesn’t make me feel any better considering Smart was on a better contract with years left. If this was simply a dart board cost cutting trade I officially don’t like it. This flops next year then Brown is on the chopping block. This is a bigger risk than a lot of people are thinking about.
How is it such a big risk? We have a huge asset to dangle teams in the form of a big time expiring contract (if it doesn’t work out), as well as the prospect of adding some good young talent over the next 12 months. If it does work out, we’re the best team in the East

The post above just answered that question. Those young players will never develop on a contender. They will end up complaining about playing time like Pritchard currently does if they actually pan out. Proven vets and ring chasers should be the goal at the end of the bench anyways.
Just like Tatum, Brown, Rozier and Williams (x2) didn’t develop? That’s just from recent Celtics history alone. Very weird bunch of assumptions based on no evidence
'23 Historical Draft: Orlando Magic.

PG: Terry Porter (90-91) / Steve Francis (00-01)
SG: Joe Dumars (92-93) / Jeff Hornacek (91-92) / Jerry Stackhouse (00-01)
SF: Brandon Roy (08-09) / Walter Davis (78-79)
PF: Terry Cummings (84-85) / Paul Millsap (15-16)
C: Chris Webber (00-01) / Ralph Sampson (83-84) / Andrew Bogut (09-10)

Re: Shams: Porzingis to Boston?
« Reply #700 on: June 22, 2023, 05:14:22 AM »

Offline LilRip

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6987
  • Tommy Points: 411
This makes sense for us, and is mainly why I’ve been beating the KAT drum this offseason. Tatum and Brown don’t play off each other , and Tatum’s best P&R’s were with Horford or Rob. We need a big who’s an offensive threat and I figured KAT was one of the top options out there.

Having KP gives Tatum (and Brown) that terrific big man offensive option to play p&r with, as opposed to someone like Horford who is arguably only a three point threat now.
- LilRip

Re: Shams: Porzingis to Boston?
« Reply #701 on: June 22, 2023, 05:27:42 AM »

Offline tenn_smoothie

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7153
  • Tommy Points: 843
In keeping with the trend, the Celtics became softer today.

Will miss Smart. It's going to be difficult watching an even more mentally weak team. Hopefully Brown is out sooner than later.

These playoffs made me even more grateful for the IT years. Those teams were fun and played above expectation. The playoff exits were inevitable but never embarrassing. It was easy to feel proud of IT and co.

Well said. This team struggles with mental discipline to stay focused and play the right way.
With Mazzulla as coach and the trades we are making, the team is moving even further away from the physical/hard working/defensive-identity group we used to have. I have zero confidence in Joe Mazzulla and hitching our fate to his wagon was a huge mistake.
The Four Celtic Generals:
Russell - Cowens - Bird - Garnett

The Four Celtic Lieutenants:
Cousy - Havlicek - McHale - Pierce

Re: Shams: Porzingis to Boston?
« Reply #702 on: June 22, 2023, 05:32:24 AM »

Offline tenn_smoothie

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7153
  • Tommy Points: 843
Listening to Bill Simmons podcast they are talking like this a one year rental? That doesn’t make me feel any better considering Smart was on a better contract with years left. If this was simply a dart board cost cutting trade I officially don’t like it. This flops next year then Brown is on the chopping block. This is a bigger risk than a lot of people are thinking about.
How is it such a big risk? We have a huge asset to dangle teams in the form of a big time expiring contract (if it doesn’t work out), as well as the prospect of adding some good young talent over the next 12 months. If it does work out, we’re the best team in the East

The post above just answered that question. Those young players will never develop on a contender. They will end up complaining about playing time like Pritchard currently does if they actually pan out. Proven vets and ring chasers should be the goal at the end of the bench anyways.
Just like Tatum, Brown, Rozier and Williams (x2) didn’t develop? That’s just from recent Celtics history alone. Very weird bunch of assumptions based on no evidence

Those players developed when the team was in more of the building mode.
Now, we are a title contender and the younger guys sit more. Plus Mazzulla isn't going to develop anyone as far as I can tell.
The Four Celtic Generals:
Russell - Cowens - Bird - Garnett

The Four Celtic Lieutenants:
Cousy - Havlicek - McHale - Pierce

Re: Shams: Porzingis to Boston?
« Reply #703 on: June 22, 2023, 05:35:57 AM »

Offline CelticSooner

  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11884
  • Tommy Points: 902
  • GOT IT!!!
Listening to Bill Simmons podcast they are talking like this a one year rental? That doesn’t make me feel any better considering Smart was on a better contract with years left. If this was simply a dart board cost cutting trade I officially don’t like it. This flops next year then Brown is on the chopping block. This is a bigger risk than a lot of people are thinking about.
How is it such a big risk? We have a huge asset to dangle teams in the form of a big time expiring contract (if it doesn’t work out), as well as the prospect of adding some good young talent over the next 12 months. If it does work out, we’re the best team in the East

The post above just answered that question. Those young players will never develop on a contender. They will end up complaining about playing time like Pritchard currently does if they actually pan out. Proven vets and ring chasers should be the goal at the end of the bench anyways.
Just like Tatum, Brown, Rozier and Williams (x2) didn’t develop? That’s just from recent Celtics history alone. Very weird bunch of assumptions based on no evidence

Late round picks almost all flop you know this. Rozier was nice trade bait I guess. Timelord fell for the same problems he currently has. Mazzulla won’t play them even if they show up early anyways. 

Re: Shams: Porzingis to Boston?
« Reply #704 on: June 22, 2023, 05:39:33 AM »

Online Birdman

  • Danny Ainge
  • **********
  • Posts: 10284
  • Tommy Points: 465
Wow!! My jaw hit the floor when I woke up this morning! Went to bed and thought Brogdon was going to clippers..now woke up with Smart going to Memphis !!! What happen overnight???
C/PF-Horford, Baynes, Noel, Theis, Morris,
SF/SG- Tatum, Brown, Hayward, Smart, Semi, Clark
PG- Irving, Rozier, Larkin