Saric and the 3rd for Fultz?

[Tr1boy]

No.

Saric is a tweener.

He would fit in with the Boston "tweener" Celtics squad then

He's not a good tweener though. Don't think he'll ever be a good defender. He might be a nice role player.

Saric is as good as KO...if not a little better, especially in the rebounding department...

Good team defender... individually not as strong... which is ok in a CBS system

[nickagneta]

Nope...just take Fultz. There is zero need to trade down in this draft. Its best player is Fultz. Take him and find other traded to fill in that frontcourt.

[BitterJim]

No.

[Tr1boy]

76ers i doubt will give up Simmons +3 for Fultz...  they are looking fwd to pair him up with embiid

What the 76ers do need though is a PG...  yeah they would love to have Fultz , or ball.  Not fox as much. They want someone that can shoot....

so they have #3 and #5 right??

If not trying to grab the #1 by dangling Saric and #3... i can see them taking Jackson or Tatum at #3 ...then Monk at #5 (and play him at the pg)

Brown will use Embiid and Simmons as the big PGs/stretch big men anyways

crap this team could be scary if it all clicks =T

[PhoSita]

Stahhhhhhhp.

[PAOBoston]

No.

Saric is a tweener.

He would fit in with the Boston "tweener" Celtics squad then

He's not a good tweener though. Don't think he'll ever be a good defender. He might be a nice role player.

Saric is as good as KO...if not a little better, especially in the rebounding department...

Good team defender... individually not as strong... which is ok in a CBS system

Honestly not a huge fan. Like I said, might be a nice role player, but I'm not trading a potential star scorer for him and a lesser prospect. Take the best talent available.

[Tr1boy]

No.

Saric is a tweener.

He would fit in with the Boston "tweener" Celtics squad then

He's not a good tweener though. Don't think he'll ever be a good defender. He might be a nice role player.

Saric is as good as KO...if not a little better, especially in the rebounding department...

Good team defender... individually not as strong... which is ok in a CBS system

Honestly not a huge fan. Like I said, might be a nice role player, but I'm not trading a potential star scorer for him and a lesser prospect. Take the best talent available.

yes but it would not be for Saric for Fultz straight up

It will be Saric + 3 for Fultz

you never know with Danny...what if he works out all of these players and he likes Fox better (for whatever reason)........ So he can get Fox and Saric as a bonus? ...of course he will do the trade

[Ogaju]

Trading Fultz is bad Juju. That is the Paul Pierce trade .....

[ETNCeltics]

There's zero reason to trade a mega-talent like Fultz to maybe contend a year or two early. Getting Fultz transcends our current core roster. 8 years from now he'll only be 27 and still in his prime. None of us will care about current needs then. He and Brown may very well be here and have us near the top of the East for a decade plus.

Unless you're getting something like Anthony Davis in return, trading this pick shouldn't even be considered.

[jambr380]

76ers i doubt will give up Simmons +3 for Fultz...  they are looking fwd to pair him up with embiid

What the 76ers do need though is a PG...  yeah they would love to have Fultz , or ball.  Not fox as much. They want someone that can shoot....

so they have #3 and #5 right??

If not trying to grab the #1 by dangling Saric and #3... i can see them taking Jackson or Tatum at #3 ...then Monk at #5 (and play him at the pg)

Brown will use Embiid and Simmons as the big PGs/stretch big men anyways

crap this team could be scary if it all clicks =T

Nope, just #3. Sac has #5 from the Cousins trade.

I would consider a Simmons/#3 for AB/#1 deal if we got assurance from Hayward that he was signing here.

For now, let's just watch all the Fultz highlights we can and enjoy this fantastic situation.

[Csfan1984]

No way. Simmons and 3 for Fultz would be ok.

[rondofan1255]

Hope Danny keeps the pick since it's #1. Unless there's some monumental Billy King level overpay.

[Yoki_IsTheName]

[PAOBoston]

No.

Saric is a tweener.

He would fit in with the Boston "tweener" Celtics squad then

He's not a good tweener though. Don't think he'll ever be a good defender. He might be a nice role player.

Saric is as good as KO...if not a little better, especially in the rebounding department...

Good team defender... individually not as strong... which is ok in a CBS system

Honestly not a huge fan. Like I said, might be a nice role player, but I'm not trading a potential star scorer for him and a lesser prospect. Take the best talent available.

yes but it would not be for Saric for Fultz straight up

It will be Saric + 3 for Fultz

you never know with Danny...what if he works out all of these players and he likes Fox better (for whatever reason)........ So he can get Fox and Saric as a bonus? ...of course he will do the trade

I still wouldn't do it. Take the guy who experts have a tier above everyone else in the draft.

[tazzmaniac]

I'm not convinced Fultz has franchise potential but he has the best star potential in this draft.  If the Sixers really, really want Fultz, I might do it for the #3, the Lakers unprotected 2018 and Saric.