Author Topic: Official 2015-16 Brooklyn Nets Season Watch Thread (21-59, 3rd slot as of 4/12)  (Read 705817 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline rollie mass

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4270
  • Tommy Points: 1233
after christmas and new years a star on a lousy team might stop running and this next stretch of games may add an injury-lopez has his big money

Offline PhoSita

  • NCE
  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21835
  • Tommy Points: 2182
Nets 7-13 over their last 20 games.  That's a 35% win percentage.  If they continue at that pace the rest of the way, they finish with 27 wins.
You’ll have to excuse my lengthiness—the reason I dread writing letters is because I am so apt to get to slinging wisdom & forget to let up. Thus much precious time is lost.
- Mark Twain

Offline Rondo9

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5379
  • Tommy Points: 277
So they slot 3-5.

Offline SCeltic34

  • Kevin Garnett
  • *****************
  • Posts: 17994
  • Tommy Points: 2339
The Mavs also started 9-4 thanks to an easy schedule.  They've been 4-7 since.  Past success (or failure) isn't always predictive of the future, admittedly even if advanced stats early in the season argued against the Nets.

Brooklyn is enjoying a very long stretch of home games, where they've actually been solid at 6-5 for the season.  They're 1-11 on the road.  Only 4 of their 15 games in December are on the road.

They're 5-5 over their last 10, but I can assure you that they will not play .500 ball for the remainder of the season because their roster just has too many holes.  Their schedule in January is tough, but no so much in February.

What concerns me slightly is the 4 or so closing games in April, where they will be playing likely playoff contenders that might choose to rest their key players.  In any case, Brooklyn shouldn't win any more than 25 games total.  I don't think any C's fan would have been particularly disappointed with a < 30 win season from the Nets at the start of the season.

Offline hwangjini_1

  • Dennis Johnson
  • ******************
  • Posts: 18195
  • Tommy Points: 2747
  • bammokja
So they slot 3-5.
that is how they project. come the draft it is quite possible one team jumps ahead of them. so i expect the nets pick to fall somewhere in the 4-6 range. still a good player can be had there. and who knows? maybe the luck of irish finally comes through for them and they jump up to #1.

just keep those fingers crossed.  :)
I believe Gandhi is the only person who knew about real democracy — not democracy as the right to go and buy what you want, but democracy as the responsibility to be accountable to everyone around you. Democracy begins with freedom from hunger, freedom from unemployment, freedom from fear, and freedom from hatred.
- Vandana Shiva

Offline Ogaju

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19479
  • Tommy Points: 1871
Since we own the Nets pick do we take their seat if they are in the lottery, or do they get the seat and just pick for us. LOL !!!

Could get really bizarre if they have to attend the lottery just to pick for us.

Offline chambers

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7483
  • Tommy Points: 943
  • Boston Celtics= Championships, nothing less.
Nets 7-13 over their last 20 games.  That's a 35% win percentage.  If they continue at that pace the rest of the way, they finish with 27 wins.

Look at bit closer and for the entire season, they've beaten three teams with a .500 or better record.
They've beaten us once, the Hawks once, and Detroit once.
Only .500 teams they've beaten out of 23 games lol.

"We are lucky we have a very patient GM that isn't willing to settle for being good and coming close. He wants to win a championship and we have the potential to get there still with our roster and assets."

quoting 'Greg B' on RealGM after 2017 trade deadline.
Read that last line again. One more time.

Offline MBunge

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4661
  • Tommy Points: 471
Since we own the Nets pick do we take their seat if they are in the lottery, or do they get the seat and just pick for us. LOL !!!

Could get really bizarre if they have to attend the lottery just to pick for us.

I think traditionally it has been that if you own another team's pick outright, you take their place at the lottery.  So, if Boston misses the playoffs, there would only be 13 people on stage for the drawing.    But since we may or may not get Minny's and Dallas' picks depending on where they fall, those teams would both be at the lottery.

Mike

Offline Ilikesports17

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8732
  • Tommy Points: 855
Nets 7-13 over their last 20 games.  That's a 35% win percentage.  If they continue at that pace the rest of the way, they finish with 27 wins.
27 wins gets you pick 5 last year, pick 6 the year before, then 5th again the year before that, then 5th, then 7th.

Basically, if Brooklyn plays better than Id expect them too, then we can expect the 5-6 lotto odds which is not half bad.

Offline Ogaju

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19479
  • Tommy Points: 1871

Since we own the Nets pick do we take their seat if they are in the lottery, or do they get the seat and just pick for us. LOL !!!

Could get really bizarre if they have to attend the lottery just to pick for us.

I think traditionally it has been that if you own another team's pick outright, you take their place at the lottery.  So, if Boston misses the playoffs, there would only be 13 people on stage for the drawing.    But since we may or may not get Minny's and Dallas' picks depending on where they fall, those teams would both be at the lottery.

Mike


that is an interesting scenario. Minny and Dallas may be there to  pick for us...

Offline max215

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8448
  • Tommy Points: 624
Nets 7-13 over their last 20 games.  That's a 35% win percentage.  If they continue at that pace the rest of the way, they finish with 27 wins.
27 wins gets you pick 5 last year, pick 6 the year before, then 5th again the year before that, then 5th, then 7th.

Basically, if Brooklyn plays better than Id expect them too, then we can expect the 5-6 lotto odds which is not half bad.

Not half bad? That sounds absolutely amazing! We'd have a decent shot at jumping into the top 3 too.
Isaiah, you were lightning in a bottle.

DKC Clippers

Offline mef730

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4783
  • Tommy Points: 1036
What concerns me slightly is the 4 or so closing games in April, where they will be playing likely playoff contenders that might choose to rest their key players.  In any case, Brooklyn shouldn't win any more than 25 games total.  I don't think any C's fan would have been particularly disappointed with a < 30 win season from the Nets at the start of the season.

If the season continues to go the way it is, these teams may be fighting down to the last game for slotting. I hope.

Since we own the Nets pick do we take their seat if they are in the lottery, or do they get the seat and just pick for us. LOL !!!

Could get really bizarre if they have to attend the lottery just to pick for us.

I think traditionally it has been that if you own another team's pick outright, you take their place at the lottery.  So, if Boston misses the playoffs, there would only be 13 people on stage for the drawing.    But since we may or may not get Minny's and Dallas' picks depending on where they fall, those teams would both be at the lottery.

Mike

If we get two picks, I think we should get two representatives. What are the chances that we could get Garnett and Pierce to step in for us?

Mike

Offline PhoSita

  • NCE
  • Robert Parish
  • *********************
  • Posts: 21835
  • Tommy Points: 2182
Nets 7-13 over their last 20 games.  That's a 35% win percentage.  If they continue at that pace the rest of the way, they finish with 27 wins.
27 wins gets you pick 5 last year, pick 6 the year before, then 5th again the year before that, then 5th, then 7th.

Basically, if Brooklyn plays better than Id expect them too, then we can expect the 5-6 lotto odds which is not half bad.

Certainly couldn't complain about getting a top 6 pick in a year the Celts look like they'll have a winning record and perhaps even be competitive in a first round playoff series.

At the same time, it would be a bit of a let down after we all salivated at the prospect of the Nets handing us Ben Simmons.

That's the kind of scenario (getting a pick in the 5-10 range instead of top 5) that I've been raising as a distinct possibility since the summertime. 

Expressing that concern around here has a tendency to be interpreted as an argument for why the Nets might make the playoffs.


Anyway, plenty of superstars have come from the back half of the top 10.  Have to hope Danny picks correctly among a crop of prospects that doesn't look like it has any no-doubt stars other than Simmons.
You’ll have to excuse my lengthiness—the reason I dread writing letters is because I am so apt to get to slinging wisdom & forget to let up. Thus much precious time is lost.
- Mark Twain

Offline Evantime34

  • NCE
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11942
  • Tommy Points: 764
  • Eagerly Awaiting the Next Fantasy Draft
Nets 7-13 over their last 20 games.  That's a 35% win percentage.  If they continue at that pace the rest of the way, they finish with 27 wins.
27 wins gets you pick 5 last year, pick 6 the year before, then 5th again the year before that, then 5th, then 7th.

Basically, if Brooklyn plays better than Id expect them too, then we can expect the 5-6 lotto odds which is not half bad.

Certainly couldn't complain about getting a top 6 pick in a year the Celts look like they'll have a winning record and perhaps even be competitive in a first round playoff series.

At the same time, it would be a bit of a let down after we all salivated at the prospect of the Nets handing us Ben Simmons.

That's the kind of scenario (getting a pick in the 5-10 range instead of top 5) that I've been raising as a distinct possibility since the summertime. 

Expressing that concern around here has a tendency to be interpreted as an argument for why the Nets might make the playoffs.


Anyway, plenty of superstars have come from the back half of the top 10.  Have to hope Danny picks correctly among a crop of prospects that doesn't look like it has any no-doubt stars other than Simmons.
I've resigned myself to Simmons not being available when we pick. That being said if we get a top 10 pick in the draft that will still help the long term outlook a ton even if it's not as much as Simmons would.

If we can add a Marcus Smart level talent in the 5-10 range with the Brooklyn pick we should be happy, even if we don't get Simmons.

The positive thing about the Nets pick is that it is determined by seeding, not directly proportional to wins and losses. By that I mean that if the Nets finish with the third worst record, it won't matter that they are much closer to making the playoffs than being the worst team in the league.

In terms of talent the Nets are way closer to being the 8th playoff seed than they are to being worse than Philly or LA. However, an argument could be made for them being the worst team outside of the bottom tier.

Even with their solid play recently I don't think they finish the year with a better record than New Orleans, Sacramento, Milwaukee or even Denver.

As a C's fan I am going to be looking at players in the 3-6 range instead of Simmons because I think longing for Simmons will leave me disappointed.
DKC:  Rockets
CB Draft: Memphis Grizz
Players: Klay Thompson, Jabari Parker, Aaron Gordon
Next 3 picks: 4.14, 4.15, 4.19

Offline Quetzalcoatl

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4100
  • Tommy Points: 419
The Nets could finish with the 9th worst record and still get us Simmons.  The Nets could finish with the worst record and not get us Simmons.  Let's all just be happy that they seem to be the 4th or 5th worst team in the league and they lost a bunch of close games so far.  They could easily be 11-12 right now instead of 7-16.  They lose one of JJ, Lopez, Bogdanovic, Jack, Larkin or Young and they're toast. 

Bogdanovic is the only real SF they have left.  They have other guys who can fill in, but they aren't true SFs.

Lopez is their star. 

JJ can still produce offense, which almost nobody else on that team can.

Larkin and Jack are the only PGs and are averaging 50 minutes a game between the two of them.

Thaddeus Young is beasting on anybody who isn't strong enough to guard him and while he isn't super useful every game, he definitely causes serious match up problems against some teams.  Like I don't think they win that last 76ers game without him, as crazy as that sounds.

They lose any one of those guys and I don't see how they can compete.

Anyways, tonight they're up against the 12-11 Magic, but the game in in BK.  The Magic haven't won there since the Nets moved from Jersey.  Orlando is a 3 point favorite, but are coming off a 111-76 drubbing by the Cavaliers on Friday, which is the biggest loss in their history.  Hopefully, they have regrouped and rested this weekend and are ready to take it to Brooklyn.