0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.
And for all that athletic prowess that he has, he is 27. In a few years all of that would fade and those fundamental skills that he is lacking would all come into question. You can't win with just athleticism and dunking, just ask Darryl Dawkins.
Quote from: MBz on May 12, 2011, 03:52:34 PMQuote from: OsirusCeltics on May 12, 2011, 03:44:36 PMQuote from: MBz on May 12, 2011, 03:37:20 PMQuote from: wdleehi on May 12, 2011, 03:34:29 PMQuote from: OsirusCeltics on May 12, 2011, 03:33:11 PMQuote from: wdleehi on May 12, 2011, 03:30:55 PMQuote from: OsirusCeltics on May 12, 2011, 03:26:21 PMQuote from: MBz on May 12, 2011, 03:20:33 PMMarc Gasol: 11.7 PPG, 7 RPG, 1.7 BPGDwight Howard: 22.9 PPG, 14.1 RPG, 2.4 BPGI'm confused. I thought players play the games, not statsCorrect.Stats are the numerical results of that play.According to that, he is twice the player on the court.By the eye test, he is the superior player while Gasol is a clog on a team with more talent. Lets see Howard play alongside Zack Randolph. Then we'll see how his points and rebound numbers look then. Thats why I'm not a stats-freak. Its always skewed by the circumstanceI am going to guess Randolph's rebounding numbers are going to take a good sized hit. Was just going to say the same thing. Yes stats don't always show a good comparison in players, but when there is that large of a difference, you usually can stop the comparing right there. If you swap Gasol and Howard right now, what happens? Memphis improves and Orlando goes backwards. Howard is an all-star center, Gasol is a good starting center, but he's not an all-star. Yeah you have a pointBut a better player does not always mean the best optionGasol moves the ball around more, picks his spots to score within the team structure. Howard on the other hand is a ball dominator in the post, and not a good passer. Theres a reason why he had that 46 and 19 game against Atlanta and still lost the gameStats look pretty when you wanna make the all-star team, but I much rather have a center who plays within a team. And Gasol is above-average in my opinionHe is above-average, he's good, I did say that. The reason he went for 46 and 19 and lost was because his team is no good. For what we need in the future, Dwight is a much better fit. Gasol is a good fit when he's the 3rd or 4th option offensively. With the big 3 declining we need a #1 option, Gasol can't give us that, Howard can. Howard can be the guy to get us 20+ a game, Gasol isn't going to be able to do that. Howard is not even a #1 option. He's never the guy the team closes the game with. In that '09 Finals run, Turkgolu, Rahard Lewis, and Raafer Alston all were ahead of him in as far as taking the last shot You are not a centerpiece of you are like the 4th option as far as 4th quarter scoring. Plain and simple
Quote from: OsirusCeltics on May 12, 2011, 03:44:36 PMQuote from: MBz on May 12, 2011, 03:37:20 PMQuote from: wdleehi on May 12, 2011, 03:34:29 PMQuote from: OsirusCeltics on May 12, 2011, 03:33:11 PMQuote from: wdleehi on May 12, 2011, 03:30:55 PMQuote from: OsirusCeltics on May 12, 2011, 03:26:21 PMQuote from: MBz on May 12, 2011, 03:20:33 PMMarc Gasol: 11.7 PPG, 7 RPG, 1.7 BPGDwight Howard: 22.9 PPG, 14.1 RPG, 2.4 BPGI'm confused. I thought players play the games, not statsCorrect.Stats are the numerical results of that play.According to that, he is twice the player on the court.By the eye test, he is the superior player while Gasol is a clog on a team with more talent. Lets see Howard play alongside Zack Randolph. Then we'll see how his points and rebound numbers look then. Thats why I'm not a stats-freak. Its always skewed by the circumstanceI am going to guess Randolph's rebounding numbers are going to take a good sized hit. Was just going to say the same thing. Yes stats don't always show a good comparison in players, but when there is that large of a difference, you usually can stop the comparing right there. If you swap Gasol and Howard right now, what happens? Memphis improves and Orlando goes backwards. Howard is an all-star center, Gasol is a good starting center, but he's not an all-star. Yeah you have a pointBut a better player does not always mean the best optionGasol moves the ball around more, picks his spots to score within the team structure. Howard on the other hand is a ball dominator in the post, and not a good passer. Theres a reason why he had that 46 and 19 game against Atlanta and still lost the gameStats look pretty when you wanna make the all-star team, but I much rather have a center who plays within a team. And Gasol is above-average in my opinionHe is above-average, he's good, I did say that. The reason he went for 46 and 19 and lost was because his team is no good. For what we need in the future, Dwight is a much better fit. Gasol is a good fit when he's the 3rd or 4th option offensively. With the big 3 declining we need a #1 option, Gasol can't give us that, Howard can. Howard can be the guy to get us 20+ a game, Gasol isn't going to be able to do that.
Quote from: MBz on May 12, 2011, 03:37:20 PMQuote from: wdleehi on May 12, 2011, 03:34:29 PMQuote from: OsirusCeltics on May 12, 2011, 03:33:11 PMQuote from: wdleehi on May 12, 2011, 03:30:55 PMQuote from: OsirusCeltics on May 12, 2011, 03:26:21 PMQuote from: MBz on May 12, 2011, 03:20:33 PMMarc Gasol: 11.7 PPG, 7 RPG, 1.7 BPGDwight Howard: 22.9 PPG, 14.1 RPG, 2.4 BPGI'm confused. I thought players play the games, not statsCorrect.Stats are the numerical results of that play.According to that, he is twice the player on the court.By the eye test, he is the superior player while Gasol is a clog on a team with more talent. Lets see Howard play alongside Zack Randolph. Then we'll see how his points and rebound numbers look then. Thats why I'm not a stats-freak. Its always skewed by the circumstanceI am going to guess Randolph's rebounding numbers are going to take a good sized hit. Was just going to say the same thing. Yes stats don't always show a good comparison in players, but when there is that large of a difference, you usually can stop the comparing right there. If you swap Gasol and Howard right now, what happens? Memphis improves and Orlando goes backwards. Howard is an all-star center, Gasol is a good starting center, but he's not an all-star. Yeah you have a pointBut a better player does not always mean the best optionGasol moves the ball around more, picks his spots to score within the team structure. Howard on the other hand is a ball dominator in the post, and not a good passer. Theres a reason why he had that 46 and 19 game against Atlanta and still lost the gameStats look pretty when you wanna make the all-star team, but I much rather have a center who plays within a team. And Gasol is above-average in my opinion
Quote from: wdleehi on May 12, 2011, 03:34:29 PMQuote from: OsirusCeltics on May 12, 2011, 03:33:11 PMQuote from: wdleehi on May 12, 2011, 03:30:55 PMQuote from: OsirusCeltics on May 12, 2011, 03:26:21 PMQuote from: MBz on May 12, 2011, 03:20:33 PMMarc Gasol: 11.7 PPG, 7 RPG, 1.7 BPGDwight Howard: 22.9 PPG, 14.1 RPG, 2.4 BPGI'm confused. I thought players play the games, not statsCorrect.Stats are the numerical results of that play.According to that, he is twice the player on the court.By the eye test, he is the superior player while Gasol is a clog on a team with more talent. Lets see Howard play alongside Zack Randolph. Then we'll see how his points and rebound numbers look then. Thats why I'm not a stats-freak. Its always skewed by the circumstanceI am going to guess Randolph's rebounding numbers are going to take a good sized hit. Was just going to say the same thing. Yes stats don't always show a good comparison in players, but when there is that large of a difference, you usually can stop the comparing right there. If you swap Gasol and Howard right now, what happens? Memphis improves and Orlando goes backwards. Howard is an all-star center, Gasol is a good starting center, but he's not an all-star.
Quote from: OsirusCeltics on May 12, 2011, 03:33:11 PMQuote from: wdleehi on May 12, 2011, 03:30:55 PMQuote from: OsirusCeltics on May 12, 2011, 03:26:21 PMQuote from: MBz on May 12, 2011, 03:20:33 PMMarc Gasol: 11.7 PPG, 7 RPG, 1.7 BPGDwight Howard: 22.9 PPG, 14.1 RPG, 2.4 BPGI'm confused. I thought players play the games, not statsCorrect.Stats are the numerical results of that play.According to that, he is twice the player on the court.By the eye test, he is the superior player while Gasol is a clog on a team with more talent. Lets see Howard play alongside Zack Randolph. Then we'll see how his points and rebound numbers look then. Thats why I'm not a stats-freak. Its always skewed by the circumstanceI am going to guess Randolph's rebounding numbers are going to take a good sized hit.
Quote from: wdleehi on May 12, 2011, 03:30:55 PMQuote from: OsirusCeltics on May 12, 2011, 03:26:21 PMQuote from: MBz on May 12, 2011, 03:20:33 PMMarc Gasol: 11.7 PPG, 7 RPG, 1.7 BPGDwight Howard: 22.9 PPG, 14.1 RPG, 2.4 BPGI'm confused. I thought players play the games, not statsCorrect.Stats are the numerical results of that play.According to that, he is twice the player on the court.By the eye test, he is the superior player while Gasol is a clog on a team with more talent. Lets see Howard play alongside Zack Randolph. Then we'll see how his points and rebound numbers look then. Thats why I'm not a stats-freak. Its always skewed by the circumstance
Quote from: OsirusCeltics on May 12, 2011, 03:26:21 PMQuote from: MBz on May 12, 2011, 03:20:33 PMMarc Gasol: 11.7 PPG, 7 RPG, 1.7 BPGDwight Howard: 22.9 PPG, 14.1 RPG, 2.4 BPGI'm confused. I thought players play the games, not statsCorrect.Stats are the numerical results of that play.According to that, he is twice the player on the court.By the eye test, he is the superior player while Gasol is a clog on a team with more talent.
Quote from: MBz on May 12, 2011, 03:20:33 PMMarc Gasol: 11.7 PPG, 7 RPG, 1.7 BPGDwight Howard: 22.9 PPG, 14.1 RPG, 2.4 BPGI'm confused. I thought players play the games, not stats
Marc Gasol: 11.7 PPG, 7 RPG, 1.7 BPGDwight Howard: 22.9 PPG, 14.1 RPG, 2.4 BPG
Quote from: OsirusCeltics on May 12, 2011, 04:00:13 PMQuote from: MBz on May 12, 2011, 03:52:34 PMQuote from: OsirusCeltics on May 12, 2011, 03:44:36 PMQuote from: MBz on May 12, 2011, 03:37:20 PMQuote from: wdleehi on May 12, 2011, 03:34:29 PMQuote from: OsirusCeltics on May 12, 2011, 03:33:11 PMQuote from: wdleehi on May 12, 2011, 03:30:55 PMQuote from: OsirusCeltics on May 12, 2011, 03:26:21 PMQuote from: MBz on May 12, 2011, 03:20:33 PMMarc Gasol: 11.7 PPG, 7 RPG, 1.7 BPGDwight Howard: 22.9 PPG, 14.1 RPG, 2.4 BPGI'm confused. I thought players play the games, not statsCorrect.Stats are the numerical results of that play.According to that, he is twice the player on the court.By the eye test, he is the superior player while Gasol is a clog on a team with more talent. Lets see Howard play alongside Zack Randolph. Then we'll see how his points and rebound numbers look then. Thats why I'm not a stats-freak. Its always skewed by the circumstanceI am going to guess Randolph's rebounding numbers are going to take a good sized hit. Was just going to say the same thing. Yes stats don't always show a good comparison in players, but when there is that large of a difference, you usually can stop the comparing right there. If you swap Gasol and Howard right now, what happens? Memphis improves and Orlando goes backwards. Howard is an all-star center, Gasol is a good starting center, but he's not an all-star. Yeah you have a pointBut a better player does not always mean the best optionGasol moves the ball around more, picks his spots to score within the team structure. Howard on the other hand is a ball dominator in the post, and not a good passer. Theres a reason why he had that 46 and 19 game against Atlanta and still lost the gameStats look pretty when you wanna make the all-star team, but I much rather have a center who plays within a team. And Gasol is above-average in my opinionHe is above-average, he's good, I did say that. The reason he went for 46 and 19 and lost was because his team is no good. For what we need in the future, Dwight is a much better fit. Gasol is a good fit when he's the 3rd or 4th option offensively. With the big 3 declining we need a #1 option, Gasol can't give us that, Howard can. Howard can be the guy to get us 20+ a game, Gasol isn't going to be able to do that. Howard is not even a #1 option. He's never the guy the team closes the game with. In that '09 Finals run, Turkgolu, Rahard Lewis, and Raafer Alston all were ahead of him in as far as taking the last shot You are not a centerpiece of you are like the 4th option as far as 4th quarter scoring. Plain and simpleNeither was Bill Russell. I think you underrate the impact of Howard's defense and rebounding. Our offense is at its best when the defense forces misses and grab rebounds to start the break.
Yeah totally you're right about Russell. My favorite player of all timeBut Howard is not really that good in that aspect. His defense is derived from his athleticism. He has no footwork, jumps high for rebounds instead of boxing out, below-average passing skills. Just the little things I see that can make a difference betw an all star player from an impact player
Quote from: Yogi on May 12, 2011, 04:04:32 PMActually I couldn't disagree with this more. Marc Gasol can stretch the floor which helps Rondo when he drives to the basket.I read that similar argument about Krstic too.
Actually I couldn't disagree with this more. Marc Gasol can stretch the floor which helps Rondo when he drives to the basket.
But Howard is not really that good in that aspect. His defense is derived from his athleticism. He has no footwork, jumps high for rebounds instead of boxing out, below-average passing skills. Just the little things I see that can make a difference betw an all star player from an impact player
Is there really a need to reply to the OP in this thread because the whole premise being suggested is pretty comical?
QuoteBut Howard is not really that good in that aspect. His defense is derived from his athleticism. He has no footwork, jumps high for rebounds instead of boxing out, below-average passing skills. Just the little things I see that can make a difference betw an all star player from an impact playerRussell's defensive was derived from his athleticism as well, what does that have to do with anything...being an elite defender has nothing to do with athleticism, otherwise Stromile Swift and Gerald Green would've been All Stars.
Quote from: GroverTheClover on May 12, 2011, 04:36:09 PMQuote from: OsirusCeltics on May 12, 2011, 04:00:13 PMQuote from: MBz on May 12, 2011, 03:52:34 PMQuote from: OsirusCeltics on May 12, 2011, 03:44:36 PMQuote from: MBz on May 12, 2011, 03:37:20 PMQuote from: wdleehi on May 12, 2011, 03:34:29 PMQuote from: OsirusCeltics on May 12, 2011, 03:33:11 PMQuote from: wdleehi on May 12, 2011, 03:30:55 PMQuote from: OsirusCeltics on May 12, 2011, 03:26:21 PMQuote from: MBz on May 12, 2011, 03:20:33 PMMarc Gasol: 11.7 PPG, 7 RPG, 1.7 BPGDwight Howard: 22.9 PPG, 14.1 RPG, 2.4 BPGI'm confused. I thought players play the games, not statsCorrect.Stats are the numerical results of that play.According to that, he is twice the player on the court.By the eye test, he is the superior player while Gasol is a clog on a team with more talent. Lets see Howard play alongside Zack Randolph. Then we'll see how his points and rebound numbers look then. Thats why I'm not a stats-freak. Its always skewed by the circumstanceI am going to guess Randolph's rebounding numbers are going to take a good sized hit. Was just going to say the same thing. Yes stats don't always show a good comparison in players, but when there is that large of a difference, you usually can stop the comparing right there. If you swap Gasol and Howard right now, what happens? Memphis improves and Orlando goes backwards. Howard is an all-star center, Gasol is a good starting center, but he's not an all-star. Yeah you have a pointBut a better player does not always mean the best optionGasol moves the ball around more, picks his spots to score within the team structure. Howard on the other hand is a ball dominator in the post, and not a good passer. Theres a reason why he had that 46 and 19 game against Atlanta and still lost the gameStats look pretty when you wanna make the all-star team, but I much rather have a center who plays within a team. And Gasol is above-average in my opinionHe is above-average, he's good, I did say that. The reason he went for 46 and 19 and lost was because his team is no good. For what we need in the future, Dwight is a much better fit. Gasol is a good fit when he's the 3rd or 4th option offensively. With the big 3 declining we need a #1 option, Gasol can't give us that, Howard can. Howard can be the guy to get us 20+ a game, Gasol isn't going to be able to do that. Howard is not even a #1 option. He's never the guy the team closes the game with. In that '09 Finals run, Turkgolu, Rahard Lewis, and Raafer Alston all were ahead of him in as far as taking the last shot You are not a centerpiece of you are like the 4th option as far as 4th quarter scoring. Plain and simpleNeither was Bill Russell. I think you underrate the impact of Howard's defense and rebounding. Our offense is at its best when the defense forces misses and grab rebounds to start the break. Yeah totally you're right about Russell. My favorite player of all timeBut Howard is not really that good in that aspect. His defense is derived from his athleticism. He has no footwork, jumps high for rebounds instead of boxing out, below-average passing skills. Just the little things I see that can make a difference betw an all star player from an impact player
I sort of agree with the OP, but only because I hate hate hate Dwight Howard and wouldn't want to have to delude myself into rooting for him and his corny Clark Kent self-interviews. He's clearly the best center in the NBA though. No argument there.
TP. 8-9 mil a year for Marc Gasol would be a much better deal than 20+ for Dwight.