2009 Celticsblog Draft: Draft Thread

[KCattheStripe]

What if I spitefully rank people who refuse to recognize the fact that I passed 300 Tps and am coming up on my second star?

YOU ARE ALL IN 14th PLACE!

What if someone is spiteful over the self promotion?   

I think Portland already has the monopoly on self-promotion-related spite.

You guys are the Uncle Moneybags of Celticsblog self promotion.

[KCattheStripe]

What if I spitefully rank people who refuse to recognize the fact that I passed 300 Tps and am coming up on my second star?

YOU ARE ALL IN 14th PLACE!

What if someone is spiteful over the self promotion?   

Well then I never had a chance now did I?

YOU ARE IN 16th PLACE!

So you are say I am one of the 16 teams that will make the playoffs?  

Sweet!!

IN YOUR DIVISION!

[wdleehi]

What if I spitefully rank people who refuse to recognize the fact that I passed 300 Tps and am coming up on my second star?

YOU ARE ALL IN 14th PLACE!

What if someone is spiteful over the self promotion?   

Well then I never had a chance now did I?

YOU ARE IN 16th PLACE!

So you are say I am one of the 16 teams that will make the playoffs?  

Sweet!!

IN YOUR DIVISION!

Well, when you get to the 13th hour of the day, you go to 1.


So you are saying I am number 1 in my conference?

Sweet!!

[nickagneta]

As for your afraid to give an opinion comment Roy. As stated above. My opinions are already documented.

[Roy Hobbs]

What if I spitefully rank people who refuse to recognize the fact that I passed 300 Tps and am coming up on my second star?

YOU ARE ALL IN 14th PLACE!

What if someone is spiteful over the self promotion?   

I think Portland already has the monopoly on self-promotion-related spite.

You guys are the Uncle Moneybags of Celticsblog self promotion.

No, Uncle Moneybags was last year's Portland team.  This year, we've added Edgar:

SCROOGE MCDUCK

LOVES THE CROTONATS

[indeedproceed]

You know, I appreciate that 25 of you have already done your presser and you're freakin out about how people are gonna vote for you, but there are 5 teams left to give their press releases, and they've been waiting since last tuesday at midnight to have their say about their team. Being one of those teams I think whatever grandstanding anyone wants to do one way or another about the voting process can wait until the pacific has their day in court, as it were.

This is supposed to be fun, and anyone who votes ingenuously for any reason is a complete tool. I don't think there needs to be much more debate than that.

[KCattheStripe]

What if I spitefully rank people who refuse to recognize the fact that I passed 300 Tps and am coming up on my second star?

YOU ARE ALL IN 14th PLACE!

What if someone is spiteful over the self promotion?   

Well then I never had a chance now did I?

YOU ARE IN 16th PLACE!

So you are say I am one of the 16 teams that will make the playoffs?  

Sweet!!

IN YOUR DIVISION!

Well, when you get to the 13th hour of the day, you go to 1.


So you are saying I am number 1 in my conference?

Sweet!!

I AM SAYING YOU ARE 4TH IN YOUR CONFERENCE! ALSO, YOU ARE NOW IN ! BILLIONTH PLACE FOR FORCING ME TO DO MATH. DISATROUS FOR YOUR RANKINGS!

[johnnyrondo]

People are a little too paranoid here. Simple test to see if a GM's vote was legit. If a GM votes The New Bulls Dynasty above all other teams, vote is legit. If a GM votes any team above The New Bulls Dynasty, obviously there is some shadiness going on. Stick by that simple guideline and you should have no worries of anyone judging you.  

[KCattheStripe]

People are a little too paranoid here. Simple test to see if a GM's vote was legit. If a GM votes The New Bulls Dynasty above all other teams, vote is legit. If a GM votes any team above The New Bulls Dynasty, obviously there is some shadiness going on. Stick by that simple guideline and you should have no worries of anyone judging you.  

What if my vote is that the New Bulls dynasty smells funny?

[johnnyrondo]

People are a little too paranoid here. Simple test to see if a GM's vote was legit. If a GM votes The New Bulls Dynasty above all other teams, vote is legit. If a GM votes any team above The New Bulls Dynasty, obviously there is some shadiness going on. Stick by that simple guideline and you should have no worries of anyone judging you.  

What if my vote is that the New Bulls dynasty smells funny?

Please capitalize "Dynasty" from now on when referencing The New Bulls Dynasty.

[nickagneta]

You know, I appreciate that 25 of you have already done your presser and you're freakin out about how people are gonna vote for you, but there are 5 teams left to give their press releases, and they've been waiting since last tuesday at midnight to have their say about their team. Being one of those teams I think whatever grandstanding anyone wants to do one way or another about the voting process can wait until the pacific has their day in court, as it were.

This is supposed to be fun, and anyone who votes ingenuously for any reason is a complete tool. I don't think there needs to be much more debate than that.

You're right. That person would be a tool.

For those who were here last year that have already admitted that there was shady voting inconsistencies, would you care to share with us the names of the owners that voted shadily?

Do you even know who those people were?

Can you let us know for sure that those people are no longer playing this game?

If all the answers to the above questions are "no" then how can anyone be so sure that retaliation voting won't take place even in a public forum?

[indeedproceed]

You know, I appreciate that 25 of you have already done your presser and you're freakin out about how people are gonna vote for you, but there are 5 teams left to give their press releases, and they've been waiting since last tuesday at midnight to have their say about their team. Being one of those teams I think whatever grandstanding anyone wants to do one way or another about the voting process can wait until the pacific has their day in court, as it were.

This is supposed to be fun, and anyone who votes ingenuously for any reason is a complete tool. I don't think there needs to be much more debate than that.

You're right. That person would be a tool.

For those who were here last year that have already admitted that there was shady voting inconsistencies, would you care to share with us the names of the owners that voted shadily?

Do you even know who those people were?

Can you let us know for sure that those people are no longer playing this game?

If all the answers to the above questions are "no" then how can anyone be so sure that retaliation voting won't take place even in a public forum?

I can tell you I oversaw a lot of the voting last year, along with Roy Dons and WD, and while we could speculate on who was voting where (by which teams were suffering the most, who was benefiting), the medium we used was solely anonymous.

[ChampKind]

You know, I appreciate that 25 of you have already done your presser and you're freakin out about how people are gonna vote for you, but there are 5 teams left to give their press releases, and they've been waiting since last tuesday at midnight to have their say about their team. Being one of those teams I think whatever grandstanding anyone wants to do one way or another about the voting process can wait until the pacific has their day in court, as it were.

This is supposed to be fun, and anyone who votes ingenuously for any reason is a complete tool. I don't think there needs to be much more debate than that.

You're right. That person would be a tool.

For those who were here last year that have already admitted that there was shady voting inconsistencies, would you care to share with us the names of the owners that voted shadily?

Do you even know who those people were?

Can you let us know for sure that those people are no longer playing this game?

If all the answers to the above questions are "no" then how can anyone be so sure that retaliation voting won't take place even in a public forum?

This is getting way too serious for what's supposed to be a fun distraction.  The rules are laid out, just abide by them, and we'll continue to have fun with limited flame wars.

[nickagneta]

You know, I appreciate that 25 of you have already done your presser and you're freakin out about how people are gonna vote for you, but there are 5 teams left to give their press releases, and they've been waiting since last tuesday at midnight to have their say about their team. Being one of those teams I think whatever grandstanding anyone wants to do one way or another about the voting process can wait until the pacific has their day in court, as it were.

This is supposed to be fun, and anyone who votes ingenuously for any reason is a complete tool. I don't think there needs to be much more debate than that.

You're right. That person would be a tool.

For those who were here last year that have already admitted that there was shady voting inconsistencies, would you care to share with us the names of the owners that voted shadily?

Do you even know who those people were?

Can you let us know for sure that those people are no longer playing this game?

If all the answers to the above questions are "no" then how can anyone be so sure that retaliation voting won't take place even in a public forum?

This is getting way too serious for what's supposed to be a fun distraction.  The rules are laid out, just abide by them, and we'll continue to have fun with limited flame wars.

Fine. I'll stop.

But if there are people whining and crying about voting inconsistencies again, don't say I didn't warn you.

[KCattheStripe]

You know, I appreciate that 25 of you have already done your presser and you're freakin out about how people are gonna vote for you, but there are 5 teams left to give their press releases, and they've been waiting since last tuesday at midnight to have their say about their team. Being one of those teams I think whatever grandstanding anyone wants to do one way or another about the voting process can wait until the pacific has their day in court, as it were.

This is supposed to be fun, and anyone who votes ingenuously for any reason is a complete tool. I don't think there needs to be much more debate than that.

You're right. That person would be a tool.

For those who were here last year that have already admitted that there was shady voting inconsistencies, would you care to share with us the names of the owners that voted shadily?

Do you even know who those people were?

Can you let us know for sure that those people are no longer playing this game?

If all the answers to the above questions are "no" then how can anyone be so sure that retaliation voting won't take place even in a public forum?

This is getting way too serious for what's supposed to be a fun distraction.  The rules are laid out, just abide by them, and we'll continue to have fun with limited flame wars.

Fine. I'll stop.

But if there are people whining and crying about voting inconsistencies again, don't say I didn't warn you.

PEOPLE WHINE ON THE INTERNET?

Seriously? This happens?