How so? Because I like their team? I don't go out of my way to trump them up in random threads, though, or call them the "New Toronto Dynasty".
Like I said, it wasn't an insult. You've played the game well, and might just win on the strength of some of those alliances. I don't think you have the best team, although I do think you've top-3 in your conference and top-8 in the Fake NBA.
Just because Houston's GM made a smart business decision to trademark "New Bulls Dynasty" from the draft thread, don't drag us into this.
But, on a slightly more serious note, you've made your case against me Roy, why can't we leave it at that?
Here's what I don't understand, Wiggle, and I'll drop it after this:
1) You've passive-aggressively bashed our team in public several times, but haven't ever given a reason you didn't like it. You *have* indicated in private, though, that it has nothing to do with injuries, with "fit", or with playing time;
2) You refused to ask any questions during Portland's press conference, where you could have explored some of your concerns;
3) You refused to answer any questions raised by Portland in your press conference;
4) You've admitted to bashing Portland to other GMs in chat and PMs. From what I understand, it was you who initiated these conversations, and that it wasn't in the nature of debate, but was closer to an attempt to sabotage a fellow GM;
5) You started publicly pimping for the team I've publicly debated the most, even though in private conversations you and I had (before I learned you were sabotaging Edgar and I), you declined to list that team as a contender.
After that, you wonder why I think that maybe you're a *little* biased against our team?
Topic: 2009 Celticsblog Draft: Draft Thread (Read 1253395 times)