0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.
Know how everyone says Garnett isn't a conventional superstar because he rarely dominates offensively in big games like a Michael or Kobe type? But we all secretly believed "he could if he had to"?
Quote from: vinnie on June 12, 2008, 10:02:29 PMQuote from: NoraG1 on June 12, 2008, 10:00:13 PMQuote from: vinnie on June 12, 2008, 09:57:30 PMIn my opinion, the real question we have to be asking about now is will the Celtics beat the Lakers again in this series?Because of this 1 game? I am taking it for what it is--one really bad game. I am not losing faith already based on one game. Before the series started I picked the Lakers in six. But, I thought they would take two in Boston and we would take 1 in LA. So, if I stick to my pick, the Celtics will not win another game. Plus, the Kobe on Rondo move has changed the whole series and Doc has no clue what to do.Picking the other team to win the series, how nice.
Quote from: NoraG1 on June 12, 2008, 10:00:13 PMQuote from: vinnie on June 12, 2008, 09:57:30 PMIn my opinion, the real question we have to be asking about now is will the Celtics beat the Lakers again in this series?Because of this 1 game? I am taking it for what it is--one really bad game. I am not losing faith already based on one game. Before the series started I picked the Lakers in six. But, I thought they would take two in Boston and we would take 1 in LA. So, if I stick to my pick, the Celtics will not win another game. Plus, the Kobe on Rondo move has changed the whole series and Doc has no clue what to do.
Quote from: vinnie on June 12, 2008, 09:57:30 PMIn my opinion, the real question we have to be asking about now is will the Celtics beat the Lakers again in this series?Because of this 1 game? I am taking it for what it is--one really bad game. I am not losing faith already based on one game.
In my opinion, the real question we have to be asking about now is will the Celtics beat the Lakers again in this series?
Quote from: Aaron on June 12, 2008, 10:01:35 PMQuote from: YUNGx24 on June 12, 2008, 09:59:00 PMpoint guard play, point guard play .. no one is setting the tone. Cassell is garbage and is still a me-first type player. and this is why rondo will never be on an elite level, he is inconsistent. He can have 16 assists one night , then the next night 6 turnovers and 1 assist.and this game is over, look at the body language. We all learned we cant come back when down by 20, on the road at that!Rondo is a second year PG playing in the finals... let's not try to make career defining statements based on an inconsistent jumpshot. He's going to be one of the all-time greats."all=time greats"? I think you might be going a little overboard on Mr. Rondo.
Quote from: YUNGx24 on June 12, 2008, 09:59:00 PMpoint guard play, point guard play .. no one is setting the tone. Cassell is garbage and is still a me-first type player. and this is why rondo will never be on an elite level, he is inconsistent. He can have 16 assists one night , then the next night 6 turnovers and 1 assist.and this game is over, look at the body language. We all learned we cant come back when down by 20, on the road at that!Rondo is a second year PG playing in the finals... let's not try to make career defining statements based on an inconsistent jumpshot. He's going to be one of the all-time greats.
point guard play, point guard play .. no one is setting the tone. Cassell is garbage and is still a me-first type player. and this is why rondo will never be on an elite level, he is inconsistent. He can have 16 assists one night , then the next night 6 turnovers and 1 assist.and this game is over, look at the body language. We all learned we cant come back when down by 20, on the road at that!
Know how everyone says Garnett isn't a conventional superstar because he rarely dominates offensively in big games like a Michael or Kobe type? But we all secretly believed "he could if he had to"?Well, it's now or never big guy...
Quote from: fairweatherfan on June 12, 2008, 10:01:54 PMKnow how everyone says Garnett isn't a conventional superstar because he rarely dominates offensively in big games like a Michael or Kobe type? But we all secretly believed "he could if he had to"?I'd change the sentiment from "he could if he had to" into "he could if he wanted to"
whittle that lead.