I think you still should draft the best player in the draft if you hold that position, even if there's no need for it. It's a no-brainer move right.
A secondary with Gonzalez and Hunter would be a dream come true. No fly zone.
Disagree totally. Just play it out. Say he's good. You're not paying 2 corners top 10 at their position that kind of money. It's irresponsible. This team has many needs. It's not basketball. They desperately need a left tackle. And the last time I checked, Travis Hunter is not keeping Drake Maye from getting killed. And if he goes down I don't care how good your corners are, you ain't winning. We already have a top corner. Need to spend resources elsewhere.
I guess I don't know if Hunter's primary position is going to be WR or CB. If he projects as primarily a CB and sometimes playing WR, I don't use the 3rd pick on him. That is too high to take a CB. I am hesitant to use that high of a pick on a WR also but for a guy that can run a 4.2 40, I would make an exception.
I don't like putting too many eggs in one basket at CB, or even 2 baskets. You need 5 or 6 good players in the defensive back field (CB and S). If 2 are great but the other 4 or 5 are below average, you will get torched. That is true at WR also but to a lesser extent. If you have just one really good WR and then not much else, they will just double the one good WR. But a good WR will have more chances to make a big play than a good CB.
Normally, I am NOT for going after a diva WR but drafting one is better than overpaying for one that is a FA.