Steph Curry to C's speculation

[rondohondo]

On weei today they were talking about some speculation from a bunch of different internet and betting sites that Curry is likely to be moved ( if he wants to ). Some betting sites have the c's and spurs as a 7% chance of happening.

The speculated trade rumors involve

#1  PG , Hauser and both the picks we got from Philly


Leaves you with a roster of

Curry.   / Pritchard / conley
White.  / beal?
Hugo. / Schiemen
Tatum / walsh. / cenac
Robinson / Queta/ Garza

The other on involves Pritchard...

Something like pp , pg  and maybe 1 first ( likely not Philly ones)

Roster  of

Curry / Conley
White/ beal?
Hugo/ Shiermen
Tatum / walsh.      / Garza
Robinson / Queta / Garza

And if we kept PP, would you be able to play both Curry and PP together?


I think I would pass and wait on Jokic

[Roy H.]

We're not getting Curry, we're not getting Jokic.

[rocknrollforyoursoul]

I really dislike the rampant speculation based on nothing. This stuff doesn?t even qualify as rumors.

[Birdman]

No way warriors would trade Curry. He?s their franchise after what he has done for them

[Birdman]

Plus dude almost 40 and injuries is piling up. These guys think playing in late 30s still got it are delusional

[Vermont Green]

I had seen this.  I find it very hard to believe.  I don't know where they come up with these things.

[aefgogreen]

I also think we would give up too much - I'm not ready to give up those draft picks for a player approaching 40.  Those Brooklyn picks were the building blocks of a championship team.  Jaylen Brown for Steph Curry is not a good deal in my book.

[Who]

Steph is 38 years old. He turns 39 in March next year.

I still rate Steph as a top 5 guard in the NBA. I'd go SGA, Cade, Haliburton, Steph & Brunson as my top 5.

[Donoghus]

We're not getting Curry, we're not getting Jokic.

Seriously.