I'm curious what others think about this theory:
In the negotiating room, Ainge offered less for Irving but when Koby Altman saw IT's medical situation, he wanted more compensation because IT wasn't going to be 100% and may still miss part of the season. Ainge relented, giving up the Net's pick, as opposed to something like the C's 2018 1st to get the deal done. This is why the initial deal looked like an overpay to many (many Celtic fans especially).
Altman agreed and when he came back to Cavs ownership saying, "Look at everything I got for Kyrie," they liked the deal just as basically everyone liked the deal for the Cavs. Then ownership found out about Isaiah's health and said, "Wait, if he's not healthy, we should get more from the Celtics," thinking this was new information for everyone, even though it wasn't.
So now the Cavs are asking for the Celtics to pay an "injured Isaiah" tax that they've actually already paid because the Cavs ownership didn't realize that was part of the initial deal and got too comfortable with the idea that this package is just what Kyrie is worth, when in reality, the precarious situation of Kyrie's trade demand has decreased his value and Cavs ownership doesn't want to believe that.
Crazy?