I wonder what the rush to move George was. Wouldn't continuing to hold out for the best deal make sense? Even if Pritchard waited until the deadline when someone would need a player to put them over the top, Pritchard would have had to have gotten a better deal than what he did.
Why the rush? Wouldn't a contigency deal with Ainge where he waited until after Hayward made his decision make more sense than taking what he did? If Boston landed Hayward they most likely would have included the Lakers pick...I hope...to ensure a run at a title in 2018.
Don't get the timing of the trade. Why the rush? Does anyone have any Indy info on why George had to be traded so soon? I wonder if offers from other teams had contingency deadlines, like, do this before free agency or else the deal is off the table.
I hate DMC but he went for something Danny could have beaten. Same for Butler and now George too. The lack of movement on Ainge's oart is starting to p!ss me off.
If somebody tells you for weeks that their best offer is on the table (Crowder plus crappy firsts), at some point it's fair to believe him.
Sure, maybe,if that is what happened. And if it is, I have to believe that Ainge heard through George's agent or other people that George was truly a rental. If you're assuming Ainge gave a final unmovable offer to Indy, I think its safe to assume Ainge had some info on George's future plans.
But you know me, Roy. I hate youth when it comes to winning championships. I would have rather had Butler or George, even for a one year chance at a ring, than a teenager in 2019 or 2020 that might not pan out for 3-4 years after.
I am starting to get royally miffed with Ainge. If he doesn't land Hayward, I am off the In Danny We Trust bandwagon.