Hinkie is the scapegoat but in reality he did a good job. Aside from the lack of veteran presence he did everything that was on the roadmap. But sometimes that's the way it goes. In a few years time if the Sixers are in the playoffs people will say it is because of the Coangelo's but it reality they will have a lot to thank Sam Hinkie for
I don't want to nitpick on this particular comment, because I fundamentally agree with it. But the issue is, What exactly are you getting in return for three years of misery?
Hinkie's (or Philly ownership's) plan resulted in the worst 3-year stretch in basketball history, made the the franchise a laughing stock, made enemies of nearly the entire league, and destroyed the spirit of their players (remember Okafor dropping his jersey in that introductory press conference)?
If you're telling me that all that pain and humiliation was the cost of a CERTAIN stretch of NBA championship contention in the coming years, then I guess I see the rationale. But it's not certain. That's the problem.
The Celtics didn't embarrass themselves. And yet they're challenging for 50 wins this year, have a ton of young talent already on the roster, 8 picks in the coming draft, and perhaps 3 straight lottery picks via Brooklyn coming up.
The Wolves didn't embarrass themselves. And they have two young studs, former #1 overall picks on their squad, in addition to a handful of other promising young players. They're loaded for the next several years.
The Bucks didn't embarrass themselves. And yet they've already got two guys on their squad -- Antetokoumpo and Parker, not to mention Monroe -- that I probably wouldn't trade for anyone on the Sixers right now. They could be frightening these next few years.
The Sixers have tons of assets. Neat. Maybe they become a 50-win team within the next 2-3 years. That'd be great. But unless you're telling me they've a lock to be a title contender, this whole thing wasn't worth it. And they're not.