I think cousins is more sheed then kg as far as personality. The talent is great but the immaturity and volatility is disconcerting. Cussing out your coach in from of the whole team is absolutely childish.
As far as the pick. It depends. I it's number one overall I might just go with Ben Simmons. If it's later then I still would roll the dice on cousins but I think it's a bigger risk then ppl think. There legitimately might be a mental issue with DMC that doesn't allow him to control his emotions.
You mean the Rasheed that was arguably the best player on a championship Pistons squad?
Also Rasheed had nowhere near Cousin's talent level. Rasheed was good, but Cousins is all-time-great good.
So career avg's of 18 ppg, 10 rpg , 46% FG'S(For a big man is bad) , 73% FT's is an all-time great player ?
Add to that his childish behavior , lack of winning and giving up on plays because he is pouting .
Those look more like Al Jefferson numbers to me , he just puts them up in a different way .
Now you're just being silly.
Please observe Demarcus Cousins' Per-36 stats for the past five seasons:
2011/12 (age 21): 21.4 points, 13 rebounds, 1.9 assists, 1.7 steals, 1.4 blocks
2012/13 (age 22): 20.1 points, 11.7 rebounds, 3.1 assists, 1.7 steals, 0.9 blocks
2013/14 (age 23): 25 points, 13 rebounds, 3.2 assists, 1.7 steals, 1.4 blocks
2014/15 (age 24): 25.4 points, 13.4 rebounds, 3.8 assists, 1.6 steals, 1.8 blocks
2015/16 (age 25): 28.5 points, 14.7 rebounds, 3.3 assists, 1.0 steals, 1.3 blocks
Please, go b ack over the past 20 years and look up the absolute greatest players who have played in that stretch, then come back and find me a list of bigs who put up stats that were clearly better than what Cousins had put up at a given age.
Let me help you - you won't. Because such a player does not exist. I know, because I tried. I looked up Hakeem, Robinson, Duncan. Garnett, Shaq, Gasol, Ewing, Malone, Barkely, Mourning - none of them had stats that were clearly better than Cousins at the same age. One or two of those guys had stats that you could argue were on par, but none better.
Please do not be naive to the fact that Cousins has put up the stats he has so far while playing only 30-32 minutes per game, while most of those all time greats back in their day had stats that looked especially great because they were playing 35-40 minutes a game.
The guys in those days also started playing much later, so while Cousins is putting up 24/13/3 at the age of 24, most of the historical stars were only in their rookie or sophomore years by that age and were not putting up stats nearly that good.
So again, look at the stats that Cousins has put up in the past 3-4 seasons compared to some of the absolute greatest big men who have ever played the game, and you will see that his numbers are right up there with anybody from the past 20-25 years.
P.s.
For their career:
Olajuwon's averages are 22 / 11 / 2 / 2.5 / 1.7 in 35 minutes per game
Robinson's averages are 21.1 / 10.6 / 2.5 / 1.4 / 3.0 in 35 minutes per game
Ewing's averages are 21.0 9.8 / 1.9 / 1.0 / 2.4 in 34 minutes per game
Duncan's averages are 19.5 / 11 / 3.1 / 0.7 / 2.2 in 34 minutes per game
Shaq's average are 23.7 / 10.9 / 2.5 / 0.6 / 2.3 in 35 minutes per game
Barkley's averages are 22.1 / 11.7 / 3.9 / 1.5 / 0.8 in 36 minutes per game
Garnett's averages are 18.2 / 10.2 / 3.8 / 1.3 / 1.4 in 35 minutes per game
Malone's averages are 25.0 / 10.1 / 3.6 / 1.4 / 0.8 in 37 minutes per game
Mourning's averages are 17.1 / 8.5 / 1.1 / 0.5 / 2.8 in 31 minutes per game
Cousins Averages are 18.9 / 10.7 / 2.6 / 1.4 / 1.1 in 31 minutes per game
Please explain to me how those career numbers are not right up there with the greatest bigs of the past 20 years, despite the fact that he is still a good 3 or 4 years away from reaching his prime?
The only guys on that list who are significantly above Cousins stats are maybe Malone and Shaq, and even their stats become merely on par once you adjust for minutes played.
Cousins is a beast. You might not like him as a person, but he has the type of big man talent that come across once or twice a decade if you're lucky.