0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.
@MarkG_MedinaLeague source familiar with Cousins' thinking: "DeMarcus wants to be a Laker. It’s up to the two sides to make a deal
Quote@MarkG_MedinaLeague source familiar with Cousins' thinking: "DeMarcus wants to be a Laker. It’s up to the two sides to make a dealWelp looks like he's gonna be the new villain of LA
Time to start hearing Laker fans here screaming "3PEAT!!!" "BACK2BACK TITLES!!!" and all that stuff...ugh the drawbacks of living in LA lol.
Quote from: LarBrd33 on June 24, 2015, 11:17:46 PMI know it's weird to see Randle as a deal breaker... but (healthy) Randle and Smart are about even in trade value in my opinion. If you're the Lakers, why would you bother to include Randle? Nobody is outbidding you if you give up the #2 pick. Lakers should stand firm on refusing to give up Randle. Kings are playing hardball... they'll cave. You got this in the bag, LA. Just offer the #2 and nothing else. Trust me on this. I know what I'm talking about. When Vlade calls and says, "Seriously... include Randle or I'm trading Cousins to Boston", just call his bluff. There's no way he passes up the opportunity to get the #2 pick. You win, Lakers. You win.This is just as ridiculous as when you said it a few days ago. Randle dropped to 7 specifically because of injuries
I know it's weird to see Randle as a deal breaker... but (healthy) Randle and Smart are about even in trade value in my opinion. If you're the Lakers, why would you bother to include Randle? Nobody is outbidding you if you give up the #2 pick. Lakers should stand firm on refusing to give up Randle. Kings are playing hardball... they'll cave. You got this in the bag, LA. Just offer the #2 and nothing else. Trust me on this. I know what I'm talking about. When Vlade calls and says, "Seriously... include Randle or I'm trading Cousins to Boston", just call his bluff. There's no way he passes up the opportunity to get the #2 pick. You win, Lakers. You win.
Quote from: TheFlex on June 24, 2015, 11:23:09 PMQuote from: LarBrd33 on June 24, 2015, 11:17:46 PMI know it's weird to see Randle as a deal breaker... but (healthy) Randle and Smart are about even in trade value in my opinion. If you're the Lakers, why would you bother to include Randle? Nobody is outbidding you if you give up the #2 pick. Lakers should stand firm on refusing to give up Randle. Kings are playing hardball... they'll cave. You got this in the bag, LA. Just offer the #2 and nothing else. Trust me on this. I know what I'm talking about. When Vlade calls and says, "Seriously... include Randle or I'm trading Cousins to Boston", just call his bluff. There's no way he passes up the opportunity to get the #2 pick. You win, Lakers. You win.This is just as ridiculous as when you said it a few days ago. Randle dropped to 7 specifically because of injuriesHeh... listen to the podcast between Lowe and Ford from today... they specifically talked about how Danny agonized over whether to select Randle or Smart. Randle was more talented. He liked Smart's attitude. Methinks the fact we already had Olynyk and Sully combined with the fact Rondo was a dead man walking had a lil somethin to do with that pick. We reportedly tried to trade Rondo for Randle months after his injury. Healthy... they are even trade value.
ProBasketballTalk is reporting that the Lakers aren't wanting to include Clarkson...... and want their #6 pick. Not going to happen.