Sometimes mere rankings don't come close to telling the story. I mean, there was Jordan, and then there was who at the other end of that chasm between #1 and #2, Drexler? In some cases, just characterizing a trade as best at position vs second best can really minimizes the the lopsidedness of a trade.
Nobody's saying that Bynum is Ryan Hollins. Just that Howard is much better than Bynum, and that the Lakers got a steal for what they gave up.
I guess you are forgetting that Dwight is a free agent at the end of the year and thus Orlando has no leverage to just pick and choose any player in the NBA.
If Jordan guaranteed the Bulls he was leaving, the Bulls had absolutely 0 leverage,and the Bulls were forced to trade him, Drexler wouldn't be such a bad return.
Miami isn't going to suddenly offer up LeBron. Let's be realistic here. Bynum was the best player on the table. You can't acquire players that aren't made available.
Well, for one thing Bynum's not going to Orlando in the first place, but I frankly don't care about Orlando's return, which I think is a barrel full of mediocrity; from the players going there, to the picks, of which the Lakers pick will probably be 28-30, and the Philly and Denver picks probably in the 18-22 range, but my irritation has to do with the Lakers, yet again, being the recipients of a lopsided deal in their favor in terms of what they got, and what they gave up.
Bynum and the 28th-30th pick for Howard is a flat out steal.
Regardless, Bynum was the best option out there. The Lakers have no reason to offer more than the best offer. Bynum was the best piece on the table and they offered it. They had no need to go even higher. Giving up any more would have been foolish. The Lakers are many things, positive and negative, but they are not foolish.
My feeling on this pretty much agrees with poster BUTerrier when he says
Seriously, I get that the Lakers didn't want to give up both Gasol and Bynum in the deal, but I'm not sure how everyone else LET them avoid it.
And again, of course I'm not saying that the Lakers were anything but shrewd in making this deal. That's not the argument I'm making. I'm saying that they got a steal in only giving up Bynum and a 28-30 pick for the guy who's been the best center in the league for at least 5 years, and is still a young guy.
I see this deal for Philly. I even see it for Denver. I don't really see the need to pull the trigger now for Orlando. I think they could have done better later, but who knows. Mainly, I'm just irritated that the Lakers, yet again, got a big upgrade relative to what they sent out.