How can they not give up Pau? How? The Lakers get these absurd trades every single time, every single year, it's **** nonsense.
They would've never given up both Pau and Bynum. You are dreaming.
Why would they make their team worse? The Lakers aren't stupid. You really think two top 5-10 big men is the price for the top big man? No way were the Lakers ever going to do that.
The point is that other teams don't have to be stupid enough to play along, and that the Lakers gave up surprisingly little to land Howard. I mean, seriously, Bynum and the 28th pick for Howard? It's the Gasol heist all over again.
Not really. Bynum is an All-Star, averaged 19-12, and is arguably the second best center in the NBA.
They dealt the second best center in the NBA for the best center in the NBA.
They won the trade, no doubt, but the Gasol trade comnparison is going way overboard.
When did Bynum become Ryan Hollins?
Sometimes mere rankings don't come close to telling the story. I mean, there was Jordan, and then there was who at the other end of that chasm between #1 and #2, Drexler? In some cases, just characterizing a trade as best at position vs second best can really minimizes the the lopsidedness of a trade.
Nobody's saying that Bynum is Ryan Hollins. Just that Howard is much better than Bynum, and that the Lakers got a steal for what they gave up.
I guess you are forgetting that Dwight is a free agent at the end of the year and thus Orlando has no leverage to just pick and choose any player in the NBA.
If Jordan guaranteed the Bulls he was leaving, the Bulls had absolutely 0 leverage,and the Bulls were forced to trade him, Drexler wouldn't be such a bad return.
Miami isn't going to suddenly offer up LeBron. Let's be realistic here. Bynum was the best player on the table. You can't acquire players that aren't made available.