I really dont like Chris Paul compared to Rondo.. Seriously.
I mean Rondo is a better passer, rebounder, defender compared to Paul.
The only thing Paul does better than Rondo right know is Shooting and Scoring the ball.
Paul is a better shooter. And i doubt Rondo will be as good as Paul because of his big hands, but scoring the ball.. Chris takes alot of shots night in and night out. Rondo rarely shoots the ball because he wants everybody involved. What happened last time Rondo shot the ball? In the 2009 Playoffs Rondo had ALOT of high scoring games.
Let's be honest: Paul is the better player.
Rondo may be the flashier passer, but they are equally effective. Rondo is unquestionably a better rebounder, but I don't want to need my PG ripping down boards, leave that to capable bigs. Rondo's defense is arguably the best in the NBA at PG, but Chris Paul isn't far behind. Our defense would be great with any PG.
But our problem is stagnant offense. Chris Paul unquestionably fixes that. The improvement he would bring to the offense is greater than what he would take away from defense and rebounding compared to Rondo, IMHO.
Now the question is obviously do you make a deal (most likely a 3-team one apparently) for possibly one run?
Normally I say no, but I think Ainge would do it. He has shown in the past that he gambled with trading their pick for Ray to land KG. Bring him here and - maybe playing in a city like Boston, with the Big Three, with all the banners in the rafters and all the HoFer's walking around, he changes his mind.
We don't even know what the new rules of the CBA yet, maybe we would be able to offer significantly more money (if Bird Rules still apply to traded players in the final year of their contract). If we lock him up, we could definitely ink D12 next summer if we can fit him under the cap.
Worst case scenario, we have a legit (albeit only one) chance at #18 this season.