Sorry I try to deal in reality. Reality is there is almost zero chance Boston gets both Paul and Howard.
Are you guys also going to criticize Ainge when he doesn't live up to your pipe dreams?
You need assets to build a great team. Ainge has shown that once. He accumulated various assets and turned them into gold. Right now I don't believe the Celtics have the kind of assets that will eventually land Chris Paul and Dwight Howard in other cities.
If Ainge can get an extension I am all for trading Rondo for Paul and quite a few others but not for a one and done. I wouldn't do it with out assurances that you're not trading your only young asset for a guy who may or may not make you better short term and wont be here more then one year.
Competent organizations play the percentages. The percentages are stacked pretty high against either Howard or Paul landing in Boston in the near future.
I agree that the odds of landing both are slim, but not impossible - unless the CBA changes drastically.
I think Ainge could find a way to get Paul without an extension, probably with another team involved.
I still don't know what assets he had then that he doesn't have now? He has several different size expiring contracts (JO $6M, Ray $10M, KG $21M). He has young, unproven "talent" (Bradley, Johnson). He has a lottery pick (granted, it's protected). He could do S&T's with Green and BBD. O yeah, and he has a young All-Star who is locked up at a good price.
And if they were to get CP3 - assuming we have the cap space available - we don't need assets. We need to sell the idea of playing here. And CP3 enhances those chances too, just like he does our current odds to win a championship.
I can understand why he wouldn't do it for KG because he'd be giving up 7 players for a complete unknown. Pulling the trigger for potentially just one year of CP3 makes more sense because of how close we are to winning another championship. We win, and him leaving is even more unlikely.
Sure it is a lot of maybe's and what if's, but I still don't know exactly what we lose. We saw Pierce with a bunch of nothing, and Rondo with a bunch of nothing would be much worse.
I'd take a swing for the fences at another championship and potentially changing the future of this franchise with new superstars. If it doesn't work out, Ainge can spend like a drunken sailor OR start the process all over again.
What "competent" organizations are always in contention by playing these secret percentages? The Lakers are the only team I can think of that don't have extended dry runs, and the Spurs haven't under Duncan's watch, but unless they luck out on a third #1 pick, their time is coming. Every other team has been terrible in recent memory.