Official Discuss your CB Draft team

[mgent]

Can somebody give my advice on lineup and rotation with my roster?

PG Curry/Dooling/Augustin
SG Roy/McGrady
SF Prince/Quentin Richardson
PF Beasley/Al Harrington
C Chandler/Bargnani/Ilgauskas/Battie

I am thinking thats my starting 5 with Bargnani 6th man?

Probably the best frontcourt off the bench (although seriously weak on D).

Maybe the best scoring front court off the bench, but I wouldn't say the best overall.

Can you name one better?  I haven't seen anything that can match up with two 17ppg scorers.

[indeedproceed]

Can somebody give my advice on lineup and rotation with my roster?

PG Curry/Dooling/Augustin
SG Roy/McGrady
SF Prince/Quentin Richardson
PF Beasley/Al Harrington
C Chandler/Bargnani/Ilgauskas/Battie

I am thinking thats my starting 5 with Bargnani 6th man?

Probably the best frontcourt off the bench (although seriously weak on D).

Maybe the best scoring front court off the bench, but I wouldn't say the best overall.

Can you name one better?  I haven't seen anything that can match up with two 17ppg scorers.

Well they're not going to get the minutes to score 17 ppg anymore, so that's not really the issue.

[celticpride07]

Can somebody give my advice on lineup and rotation with my roster?

PG Curry/Dooling/Augustin
SG Roy/McGrady
SF Prince/Quentin Richardson
PF Beasley/Al Harrington
C Chandler/Bargnani/Ilgauskas/Battie

I am thinking thats my starting 5 with Bargnani 6th man?

Probably the best frontcourt off the bench (although seriously weak on D).

Maybe the best scoring front court off the bench, but I wouldn't say the best overall.

Can you name one better?  I haven't seen anything that can match up with two 17ppg scorers.

Well they're not going to get the minutes to score 17 ppg anymore, so that's not really the issue.

Harrington and Bargnani will provide the scoring off the bench..i don't think Beasley would be a big offensive threat off the bench anyways that's why i think beasley should start.

[Roy H.]

LA's bench bugs can score. They can't defend or rebound. I would definitely take Randolph and Gooden-- for instance- - are a much better overall pairing, IMO.

[mgent]

Can somebody give my advice on lineup and rotation with my roster?

PG Curry/Dooling/Augustin
SG Roy/McGrady
SF Prince/Quentin Richardson
PF Beasley/Al Harrington
C Chandler/Bargnani/Ilgauskas/Battie

I am thinking thats my starting 5 with Bargnani 6th man?

Probably the best frontcourt off the bench (although seriously weak on D).

Maybe the best scoring front court off the bench, but I wouldn't say the best overall.

Can you name one better?  I haven't seen anything that can match up with two 17ppg scorers.

Well they're not going to get the minutes to score 17 ppg anymore, so that's not really the issue.

I'm obviously aware of this.  Still both are good scorers.

[celticpride07]

Bargnani is going to hurt that team no matter what do with him.

He gives up more points (defense/rebounding) than he creates (offense).

The only thing you can do is get rid of him or limit his minutes.

i agree bargnani is not a good rebounder/defender...his role is to be a scoring 6th man at the backup PF and C..he is 7 feet tall and should get some rebounds and blocks here and there..but he is not worthless and should be cut...thats crazy talk!

[The Walker Wiggle]

I'm still catching up with a lot of this weekend's discussion - IP and Who doing yeoman's work and a tip of the cap to the Southeast - but wanted to make one suggestion.

Might be nice to append each division's rough rotations along with the link to that team's presser? For ease of comparison?

(Or maybe that's more trouble than it's worth...)

[The Walker Wiggle]

1 agree Bargnani is not a good rebounder/defender...

He's actually an underrated post-defender. But he does struggle in almost all other regards, defending the pick and roll, closing out shooters, etc.

[mgent]

LA's bench bugs can score. They can't defend or rebound. I would definitely take Randolph and Gooden-- for instance- - are a much better overall pairing, IMO.

Well, I rank you up there too Roy.  Simply because Randolph is possibly the best player coming off the bench.

[celticpride07]

LA's bench bugs can score. They can't defend or rebound. I would definitely take Randolph and Gooden-- for instance- - are a much better overall pairing, IMO.

Well, I rank you up there too Roy.  Simply because Randolph is possibly the best player coming off the bench.

I thought this board didn't like randolph when he was on other peoples teams we got hammered. now that randolph is on sacramento hes ok and not a cancer/problem and the board now likes randolph? just wondering.

[KCattheStripe]

LA's bench bugs can score. They can't defend or rebound. I would definitely take Randolph and Gooden-- for instance- - are a much better overall pairing, IMO.

Well, I rank you up there too Roy.  Simply because Randolph is possibly the best player coming off the bench.

I thought this board didn't like randolph when he was on other peoples teams we got hammered. now that randolph is on sacramento hes ok and not a cancer/problem and the board now likes randolph? just wondering.

I liked ZBO!

[StartOrien]

I'm far from the World's largest Z-Bo fan, there's some serious questions about his defense, character and inability to win. But at the same time, he's an allstar, and he's coming off the bench for Sac-town.

[celticpride07]

I'm far from the World's largest Z-Bo fan, there's some serious questions about his defense, character and inability to win. But at the same time, he's an allstar, and he's coming off the bench for Sac-town.

i think i would start randolph because hes in a contract year and will want to put up all star numbers again or he will be a cancer for sure on the bench imo.

[StartOrien]

I'm far from the World's largest Z-Bo fan, there's some serious questions about his defense, character and inability to win. But at the same time, he's an allstar, and he's coming off the bench for Sac-town.

i think i would start randolph because hes in a contract year and will want to put up all star numbers again or he will be a cancer for sure on the bench imo.

He couldn't really do that. Boozer & Z-Bo's skill set are far too similar.

[celticpride07]

I'm far from the World's largest Z-Bo fan, there's some serious questions about his defense, character and inability to win. But at the same time, he's an allstar, and he's coming off the bench for Sac-town.

i think i would start randolph because hes in a contract year and will want to put up all star numbers again or he will be a cancer for sure on the bench imo.

He couldn't really do that. Boozer & Z-Bo's skill set are far too similar.

This lineup is an option, im not sure if Roy likes it though.

Boozer at C Randolph PF Jefferson SF Lee SG Rose PG

6th man Lewis