Not trading Ray will set the Cs back 4+ years. They are now in cap hell until KG comes off the books with no good picks or young assets outside of Rondo to trade, and Rondo shouldnt be traded. Expect mediocre play and picks in the low 20's and high teens for 4-5 years.
We got the one title this is what is the back lash. Was it worth it? I still say yes.
Why would not trading ray set the C's back anymore than having him come off the books if no teams wanted to trade young impact players for our pieces. that makes zero sense.
All the crazy trade hypo's people tossed up that didn't come to pass we're significantly worse than the trades made in reality.
Teams are not required to take bad deals from us because we're the celtics.
He comes off the books but please understand the NBA salary cap before posting.
thanks,
I do, what do you think i don't understand about it? It has nothign to do with your logic leap that there was some mythical deal around that gave us a impact young player for ray allen's contract plus the unattractive bench pieces that we "missed"
Poster's playing around with the trade machine and posting rumors does not equal = a potential trade partner in reality, nor would that have anything to do with the salary cap relative to losing or trading ray for a similar contract under your original post.
IF your going make a catty sarcastic comment to try to degrade a poster and mask the fact you have no real argument, at least try to make it funny, thanks.
