Author Topic: Marquis out Tuesday, Tony in?  (Read 24900 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Marquis out Tuesday, Tony in?
« Reply #105 on: December 15, 2009, 10:28:44 AM »

Offline nickagneta

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48121
  • Tommy Points: 8800
  • President of Jaylen Brown Fan Club
He's a bit shaky but, he's doing his part.  Got a few more deflections and made a few buckets and didn't play PG.  I don't think anyone could say he's hasn't been a plus since he's been back.

He's a nice athletic piece to go along with a bench consisting of mostly 3 pt shooters and 1 dude who has the worst hands God ever created.

A plus compared to what?  Playing with 4 guys?  Having Scal play SG?  JR Giddens?

He is holding down the fort well enough, mainly because the rest of the team is so strong, but I would hardly call him a plus.  Maybe he is inching towards passable.

I wouldn't call him a plus (and since Doc is talking about potentially benching him, I don't think Doc would, either).  Last night, he played a good, controlled game.  Nothing spectacular, but solid.  Against Washington, he played one good half, and one poor one.  The other two games he's played have been poor.

So, in four games, Tony has played three decent to good halves.  I just can't find myself getting all fired up about a player who plays okay basketball 37.5% of the time.

If Tony could play every night like last night, nobody would criticize him.  He wasn't a difference maker, but he played his part.  No problem.  As Doc said, though, if Tony can't hold on to the ball (like in other games), he doesn't deserve a spot on the floor.
Doc does seem to be stressing keeping the turnovers to a minimum this year. After two abysmal seasons as one of the worst teams in the league in turning the ball over. the Celtics are now the 12th best team in the league in taking care of the ball. They also have the third best turnover differential in the league, a place they haven't been on the stat chart in a long long time(since 2002-03).

If Turnover Tony is going to be continuing with his really bad turnover ratio, in a year where the coaching staff is openly stressing taking better care of the ball, he will be doing a lot of sitting. It's no wonder he sat almost the entire second half against Chicago as he turned the ball over twice and twice stupidly tried to take shots after pulling up off the dribble and was surrounded by Noah and Miller and then had his shot blocked. Four unofficial turnovers in 6 minutes of play won't get Tony playing time.

Re: Marquis out Tuesday, Tony in?
« Reply #106 on: December 15, 2009, 01:19:39 PM »

Offline Chris

  • Global Moderator
  • Dennis Johnson
  • ******************
  • Posts: 18008
  • Tommy Points: 642
He's a bit shaky but, he's doing his part.  Got a few more deflections and made a few buckets and didn't play PG.  I don't think anyone could say he's hasn't been a plus since he's been back.

He's a nice athletic piece to go along with a bench consisting of mostly 3 pt shooters and 1 dude who has the worst hands God ever created.

A plus compared to what?  Playing with 4 guys?  Having Scal play SG?  JR Giddens?

He is holding down the fort well enough, mainly because the rest of the team is so strong, but I would hardly call him a plus.  Maybe he is inching towards passable.

One man's passable is another man's positive when that man assumes a negative.  It's all perspective.

OK, my brain is mush right now.  Are you saying that you assume Tony Allen is going to be so terrible, that when he is just barely passable as an NBA player, you take that as a "plus"?

Re: Marquis out Tuesday, Tony in?
« Reply #107 on: December 15, 2009, 02:08:45 PM »

Offline Birdbrain

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2939
  • Tommy Points: 235
  • 36 charges and counting..
He's a bit shaky but, he's doing his part.  Got a few more deflections and made a few buckets and didn't play PG.  I don't think anyone could say he's hasn't been a plus since he's been back.

He's a nice athletic piece to go along with a bench consisting of mostly 3 pt shooters and 1 dude who has the worst hands God ever created.

A plus compared to what?  Playing with 4 guys?  Having Scal play SG?  JR Giddens?

He is holding down the fort well enough, mainly because the rest of the team is so strong, but I would hardly call him a plus.  Maybe he is inching towards passable.

One man's passable is another man's positive when that man assumes a negative.  It's all perspective.

OK, my brain is mush right now.  Are you saying that you assume Tony Allen is going to be so terrible, that when he is just barely passable as an NBA player, you take that as a "plus"?

Yes sorry I was trying to be somewhat funny.  I agree with your take on the situation.
Little Fockers 1.5/10
Gulliver's Travels 1/10
Grown Ups -20/10
Tron Legacy 6.5/10

Re: Marquis out Tuesday, Tony in?
« Reply #108 on: December 15, 2009, 04:15:35 PM »

Offline SalmonAndMashedPotatoes

  • Jrue Holiday
  • Posts: 366
  • Tommy Points: 119

Quote
"Thing is he has to take care of the ball. If he can’t take of the ball, he can’t play"

This is Doc's quote. Please point to the area where Doc said he was being used as a point guard.

That's part of the quote.  Here's the rest of it:

Quote
“Right now, Eddie’s going to have to handle the ball more, and that hurts his game,” Rivers said. “If he’s handling the ball and setting things up, then he’s not a shooter.”

Put those two together and it's plain: Doc needs TA to act as the defacto point guard, so as to lessen Eddie's ball handling responsibilities and free up his shooting.

Of course, Doc *could* say the same thing about TA because he's much more successful when he doesn't have to set up the offense either. 

As a matter of fact, Tony has brought up up the ball and initiated the offense just a handful of times this year, no more or less than any average shooting guard does on a regular basis. When Tony has been in Ray, Pierce or Eddie has been the point guard. This is also true for almost all of last year as "the Tony at PG" experiment pretty much ended in January of 2008 because he was so inept at it.

The point, Nick, is rather simple.  It's not a question of 'bringing the ball up the court' on occasion; it's a matter of having the brunt of the ballhandling and shot creation duties thrust upon TA due to House's shortcomings as a playmaker, dribbler, and penetrator.

Doc decries TA's ball handling and notes how much better Eddie would be if somebody could set him up--that's my entire argument *for* TA as well.  He could be so much better if he was being set up, instead of being forced to be defacto point guard. 

As for you continued cries of pity for poor Tony who hasn't been given a chance because he's been hurt, please explain to me why players across the league like Amare Stoudemire, Grant Hill, Greg Oden, Mike Dunleavy, Luol Deng, Gilbert Arenas, Trevor Ariza and others can all can back from injuries and be as good if not better than beforehand and yet Allen we have to give some special consideration to because when he gets injured he never returns to play as well as before he got injured.

There have been no cries, nor any excuses made--that's the strawman created to suit your preconceived argument.  TA *has* been hurt and his inability to stay healthy *is* a huge problem.  *But*, when healthy and given consistent minutes, he *has* played well (first month of the 2008-2009 season, for example).  He's just been too injured for most people to notice.

What I *would* decry is how TA's injury problems have been led to the irrational hate that you and others have engaged in.  Plenty of players are injury-prone, but hardly any of them are vilified for it.  That's exactly what's happened to TA. 

Please, Salmon. The "woe is me" defense for Tony's inability to produce is beyond ridiculous. Professional athletes come back from injuries all the time. Well, at least good ones do.

So, if you're good, you'll *always* heal and come back better than ever, no matter what?  That statement is preposterous.  The history of sports is littered by many examples of talented players, some good, and some great, who have suffered injury-filled and therefore limited careers.  Anyone remember Leon Powe? 

As nick said, I don't see any ringing endorsement, or even excuse for Tony's play, in Doc's statement.

No, it's not a ringing endorsement.  It's an indictment of Doc's continued misuse of Tony Allen, one that justifies House's limited game and substitutes around it in order to maximize it, while AT THE SAME TIME using the same twisted logic to demand Tony Allen play a role he's ill-suited for...

The exact things Doc said about Eddie House--that he's much more effective off-the-ball and less effective when he's forced to distribute--could have been said about TA.  The same threat--that TA better handle the ball better as the defacto point guard so as to help get Eddie off--could have been made against House as well as a means towards getting TA going.  Both players NEED to play off-the-ball to play effective, efficient offense.  Doc (finally) came around to this in regard to Eddie House.  But a similar epiphany vis a vis Tony Allen has yet to materialize...

(The fact that you say the "the Roy Hobbs of the world" are "bending reality", and then attack Eddie House for not being able to dribble or shoot (huh? ???) is irony at it's best.)


Well, either you 'bend' reality or you can't read well.  What I *said*, actually, was that Eddie can't dribble *and* shoot well, meaning that he can't do both at the same time, which is why he struggles with his shot when he's forced to distribute, something Doc agrees with as mentioned in the above quote where he says that “If he’s handling the ball and setting things up, then he’s not a shooter." 

Folly. Persist.

Re: Marquis out Tuesday, Tony in?
« Reply #109 on: December 15, 2009, 05:11:05 PM »

Offline Chris

  • Global Moderator
  • Dennis Johnson
  • ******************
  • Posts: 18008
  • Tommy Points: 642
He's a bit shaky but, he's doing his part.  Got a few more deflections and made a few buckets and didn't play PG.  I don't think anyone could say he's hasn't been a plus since he's been back.

He's a nice athletic piece to go along with a bench consisting of mostly 3 pt shooters and 1 dude who has the worst hands God ever created.

A plus compared to what?  Playing with 4 guys?  Having Scal play SG?  JR Giddens?

He is holding down the fort well enough, mainly because the rest of the team is so strong, but I would hardly call him a plus.  Maybe he is inching towards passable.

One man's passable is another man's positive when that man assumes a negative.  It's all perspective.

OK, my brain is mush right now.  Are you saying that you assume Tony Allen is going to be so terrible, that when he is just barely passable as an NBA player, you take that as a "plus"?

Yes sorry I was trying to be somewhat funny.  I agree with your take on the situation.

Ah, my bad.  Me at work = jokes go over my head.

Re: Marquis out Tuesday, Tony in?
« Reply #110 on: December 15, 2009, 05:14:28 PM »

Offline scoop

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 663
  • Tommy Points: 74
Tony Allen has showed over and over he isn't good playing off-the-ball. Guards who can't catch and shoot rarely are. His game is being ball-dominant.

Re: Marquis out Tuesday, Tony in?
« Reply #111 on: December 15, 2009, 08:15:17 PM »

Online snively

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5987
  • Tommy Points: 503
As nick said, I don't see any ringing endorsement, or even excuse for Tony's play, in Doc's statement.

Basically, he says Tony is playing okay defense, but gambles too much.  That's pretty much Tony's M.O.  He says that Tony can't take care of the ball.  Again, this is nothing new.  The great thing is, Doc said that Tony might not see additional minutes if he continues to play like a moron.

Tony Allen is a shooting guard who can't dribble and who can't shoot.  Generally, players like that are playing in the D-League, rather than the NBA.

Well Tony didn't take care of the ball at all in the first 3 games, as we was averaging about 6 turnovers per 36.  When Tony averages TOs at his normal (and high) rate, Doc has no problem playing him, as has been demonstrated by the consistent playing time TA has had under Doc's tenure.

As for the D-league dis, I'm not sure exactly what you're trying to say: that TA's only good enough for the D-league? Bill Walker and JR Giddens are stars in the D-league and they haven't even come close to displacing TA in the rotation.  TA's definitely an NBA-level player.

TA's turnover problems will keep him out of the main rotation of contending teams, but the only thing that will keep him out of the NBA while he's still in his prime is his health (though I guess another serious off-court incident could also be a factor).
2025 Draft: Chicago Bulls

PG: Chauncey Billups/Deron Williams
SG: Kobe Bryant/Eric Gordon
SF: Jimmy Butler/Danny Granger/Danilo Gallinari
PF: Al Horford/Zion Williamson
C: Yao Ming/Pau Gasol/Tyson Chandler

Re: Marquis out Tuesday, Tony in?
« Reply #112 on: December 15, 2009, 08:23:31 PM »

Offline Roy Hobbs

  • In The Rafters
  • The Natural
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 33333
  • Tommy Points: 6430
  • Doc could learn a thing or two from Norman Dale
When Tony averages TOs at his normal (and high) rate, Doc has no problem playing him, as has been demonstrated by the consistent playing time TA has had under Doc's tenure.

I'm not sure this is true.  Doc may play him in regular season games, especially when we're short-handed, but he certainly wasn't inclined to play him during our championship run, when Tony averaged 4.3 minutes per game (predominantly in garbage time).  Last year, when we were extremely short-handed and Ray and Paul were exhausted, Tony saw 6.0 minutes per game.

Doc knows Tony can't be counted on in high-leverage minutes.  He's a fringe NBA player, and this will be his last season in Boston.

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

Portland CrotoNats:  2009 CB Draft Champions

Re: Marquis out Tuesday, Tony in?
« Reply #113 on: December 20, 2009, 08:29:31 PM »

Offline Roy Hobbs

  • In The Rafters
  • The Natural
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 33333
  • Tommy Points: 6430
  • Doc could learn a thing or two from Norman Dale
Credit where it's due:  Tony has looked good in the last couple days.

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

Portland CrotoNats:  2009 CB Draft Champions

Re: Marquis out Tuesday, Tony in?
« Reply #114 on: December 20, 2009, 08:30:43 PM »

Offline nickagneta

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48121
  • Tommy Points: 8800
  • President of Jaylen Brown Fan Club
Credit where it's due:  Tony has looked good in the last couple days.
AWWWWWWWWW. Do we have to Roy?  Okay, yeah he has.

Re: Marquis out Tuesday, Tony in?
« Reply #115 on: December 20, 2009, 08:31:57 PM »

Offline Roy Hobbs

  • In The Rafters
  • The Natural
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 33333
  • Tommy Points: 6430
  • Doc could learn a thing or two from Norman Dale
Credit where it's due:  Tony has looked good in the last couple days.
AWWWWWWWWW. Do we have to Roy?  Okay, yeah he has.

Hey, if he can keep the turnovers and stupid mistakes down, I've got no major problem with Tony as a player.  Unfortunately, though, I'm skeptical that he can do that.

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

Portland CrotoNats:  2009 CB Draft Champions

Re: Marquis out Tuesday, Tony in?
« Reply #116 on: December 20, 2009, 08:37:38 PM »

Offline nickagneta

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48121
  • Tommy Points: 8800
  • President of Jaylen Brown Fan Club
Credit where it's due:  Tony has looked good in the last couple days.
AWWWWWWWWW. Do we have to Roy?  Okay, yeah he has.

Hey, if he can keep the turnovers and stupid mistakes down, I've got no major problem with Tony as a player.  Unfortunately, though, I'm skeptical that he can do that.
IF he can play within himself and not play stupid turnover prone ball, he can be productive and a positive for this team off the bench. That's a big if.

But if he does he could also become exceptional trade bait if some team feels he would be worth grabbing for a prominent role on their team. That's my pipe dream though, a best of all world's scenario. Tony plays great for a while, increases his value, helps the C's win games gets trade for someone productive and young with further potential to develop and then Tony does his usual and gets injured or starts to revert back to normal bad Tony.

Re: Marquis out Tuesday, Tony in?
« Reply #117 on: December 21, 2009, 03:10:42 AM »

Offline GeoDim

  • Kristaps Porzingis
  • Posts: 184
  • Tommy Points: 22
Sick play from House and Allen last night, in case you missed it.  Nice to see that Tony can still get up there after the knee problems.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UsHw81sm2Xc

Re: Marquis out Tuesday, Tony in?
« Reply #118 on: December 21, 2009, 03:25:57 AM »

Offline lon3lytoaster

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4608
  • Tommy Points: 157
  • Word aapp!
My problem with Tony has been that he hasn't looked comfortable in his own body in a few years. I hope that dunk did something for him. He jumped and didn't break. I'm happy for him, believe it or not I don't want to hate Tony.

Keep it up, big fella.

Re: Marquis out Tuesday, Tony in?
« Reply #119 on: December 21, 2009, 08:02:24 AM »

Offline 2short

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6080
  • Tommy Points: 428
Credit where it's due:  Tony has looked good in the last couple days.
any chance he's been watching and learning from marquis ?  they have similiarities...maybe tony noticed just how in control someone can be
tony has played really nicely the last 2, if he can stay within himself and play to his strengths what a great guy to have on bench
anyone notice when the vet tony slowed a play down near the end last night?  :o
ps-i've been bashing ta for awhile now so i hope he'll make me eat crow