Author Topic: Lester Hudson is a keeper  (Read 44554 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Lester Hudson is a keeper
« Reply #150 on: October 16, 2009, 08:23:56 AM »

Offline Bankshot

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7540
  • Tommy Points: 632
I really like what I've seen from him so far.  Plays with a lot of confidence.
"If somebody would have told you when he was playing with the Knicks that Nate Robinson was going to change a big time game and he was going to do it mostly because of his defense, somebody would have got slapped."  Mark Jackson

Re: Lester Hudson is a keeper
« Reply #151 on: October 16, 2009, 08:51:12 AM »

Offline moiso

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7690
  • Tommy Points: 447
I really like what I've seen from him so far.  Plays with a lot of confidence.
Exactly.  The confidence goes a long way.  I think Pruitt had better tools, but he was too "shy" to make an impact on the game- playing not to make mistakes.  Hudson wants to make things happen.  I like it.

Re: Lester Hudson is a keeper
« Reply #152 on: October 16, 2009, 10:41:44 AM »

Online Redz

  • Punner
  • Global Moderator
  • Red Auerbach
  • *******************************
  • Posts: 31848
  • Tommy Points: 3849
  • Yup
+    =  =                            (Not a bad equation ;))

Can we throw in a little Tiny Archibald into the hoops player cauldron?

mmmmmm...basketball player stew
Yup

Re: Lester Hudson is a keeper
« Reply #153 on: October 16, 2009, 07:08:24 PM »

Offline Tr1boy

  • Paul Pierce
  • ***************************
  • Posts: 27260
  • Tommy Points: 867
Hudson has made the team. The guy had no business of being drafted where he was this year. I don't get how a guy who forfeit his right to be drafted higher last year for the sake to complete his education is at a worst state than a potentially skilled freshman who is dying to go to the nba and forget about completing their studies. Just goes to show you about guys like Hudson who gets things done. And i believe he will also this season getting minutes (vs pruitt) and making the most of it.




Re: Lester Hudson is a keeper
« Reply #154 on: October 16, 2009, 08:16:51 PM »

Offline cons

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1136
  • Tommy Points: 103
haven't read the whole thread - but i agree he's a keeper. I've been impressed so far.

he reminds me of darrell armstrong, who also came up under doc rivers. it'd be nice to see hudson become that kind of player.

Re: Lester Hudson is a keeper
« Reply #155 on: October 16, 2009, 09:32:33 PM »

Offline Bahku

  • CB HOF Editor
  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19771
  • Tommy Points: 3632
  • Oe ma krr pamtseotu
Funny ... I haven't read anything about Lester being interested in bees ... let alone a keeper!  ;)
2010 PAPOUG, 2012 & 2017 PAPTYG CHAMP, HD BOT

* BAHKU MUSIC *

Re: Lester Hudson is a keeper
« Reply #156 on: October 16, 2009, 10:19:06 PM »

Offline liam

  • NCE
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 45928
  • Tommy Points: 3341
I really like what I've seen from him so far.  Plays with a lot of confidence.
Exactly.  The confidence goes a long way.  I think Pruitt had better tools, but he was too "shy" to make an impact on the game- playing not to make mistakes.  Hudson wants to make things happen.  I like it.

I agree. Pruitt had skills but was waiting for something. i think Hudson knows how much this shot means.

Re: Lester Hudson is a keeper
« Reply #157 on: October 16, 2009, 10:21:28 PM »

Offline indeedproceed

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 42585
  • Tommy Points: 2756
  • You ain't the boss of the freakin' bedclothes.
I really like what I've seen from him so far.  Plays with a lot of confidence.
Exactly.  The confidence goes a long way.  I think Pruitt had better tools, but he was too "shy" to make an impact on the game- playing not to make mistakes.  Hudson wants to make things happen.  I like it.

I agree. Pruitt had skills but was waiting for something. i think Hudson knows how much this shot means.

Good observation

"You've gotta respect a 15-percent 3-point shooter. A guy
like that is always lethal." - Evan 'The God' Turner

Re: Lester Hudson is a keeper
« Reply #158 on: October 16, 2009, 10:47:28 PM »

Offline HomeRunBaker

  • Hugo Gonzalez
  • Posts: 64
  • Tommy Points: 13
Hudson looks good as in "he maybe could help us in a couple of years after House is gone" but i don't see how he cracks the rotation or even dresses on most nights with Eddie House healthy.  You simply cannot play them together in the backcourt nor would you want to with Marquis here. 

I see him as a Will Bynum-type who could make it when he finds the right situation to get his minutes in a specific role off the bench......those minutes aren't available for a rookie on a team with championship aspirations. 


Re: Lester Hudson is a keeper
« Reply #159 on: October 16, 2009, 10:49:52 PM »

Offline indeedproceed

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 42585
  • Tommy Points: 2756
  • You ain't the boss of the freakin' bedclothes.
Hudson looks good as in "he maybe could help us in a couple of years after House is gone" but i don't see how he cracks the rotation or even dresses on most nights with Eddie House healthy.  You simply cannot play them together in the backcourt nor would you want to with Marquis here. 

I see him as a Will Bynum-type who could make it when he finds the right situation to get his minutes in a specific role off the bench......those minutes aren't available for a rookie on a team with championship aspirations. 



Pretty good synopsis. If Hudson gets minutes with us, it is not because that is the plan.

"You've gotta respect a 15-percent 3-point shooter. A guy
like that is always lethal." - Evan 'The God' Turner

Re: Lester Hudson is a keeper
« Reply #160 on: October 16, 2009, 11:22:57 PM »

Offline Tai

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2230
  • Tommy Points: 32
Hudson looks good as in "he maybe could help us in a couple of years after House is gone" but i don't see how he cracks the rotation or even dresses on most nights with Eddie House healthy.  You simply cannot play them together in the backcourt nor would you want to with Marquis here. 

I see him as a Will Bynum-type who could make it when he finds the right situation to get his minutes in a specific role off the bench......those minutes aren't available for a rookie on a team with championship aspirations. 

Are you just saying this because of Marbury? Hudson looks like he can actually defend. And, you could have Eddie guard the 1s while Hudson guards the 2s while Daniels plays the 3.

In the end, Daniels probably will be the point forward for the 2nd unit while Hudson's eased into becoming a PG in the D-league, but I don't necessarily buy that Hudson can't play alongside House defensively.

Re: Lester Hudson is a keeper
« Reply #161 on: October 16, 2009, 11:39:05 PM »

Offline clover

  • Front Page Moderator
  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6130
  • Tommy Points: 315
Hudson can defend, he's strong, and he has long arms that let him defend longer than his height.  Not a problem.

Re: Lester Hudson is a keeper
« Reply #162 on: October 16, 2009, 11:42:40 PM »

Offline billysan

  • Al Horford
  • ***
  • Posts: 3875
  • Tommy Points: 178
Hudson looks good as in "he maybe could help us in a couple of years after House is gone" but i don't see how he cracks the rotation or even dresses on most nights with Eddie House healthy.  You simply cannot play them together in the backcourt nor would you want to with Marquis here. 

I see him as a Will Bynum-type who could make it when he finds the right situation to get his minutes in a specific role off the bench......those minutes aren't available for a rookie on a team with championship aspirations. 

Are you just saying this because of Marbury? Hudson looks like he can actually defend. And, you could have Eddie guard the 1s while Hudson guards the 2s while Daniels plays the 3.

In the end, Daniels probably will be the point forward for the 2nd unit while Hudson's eased into becoming a PG in the D-league, but I don't necessarily buy that Hudson can't play alongside House defensively.

This is a slippery slope for Hudson. HRB has a valid point as usual with the duplication of Eddie House type skills. OTOH, if Hudson gets in the game a couple of times and makes a few shots, a few stops and minimal mistakes in a few short minutes lined up next to Eddie and Marquis??........ 

He could force his way into the rotation. His defense will be the key, just like it will with JR Giddens. If he outplays Eddie defensively and proves he can cover most of the two guards adequately then he has a shot.

Of course, if he gets in and looks like a bad Tony Allen impersonator that will also seal his role into stone. It will be nearly impossible for him to be mistake free as a rookie. The odds are certainly not in his favor.
"First fix their hearts" -Eizo Shimabuku

Re: Lester Hudson is a keeper
« Reply #163 on: October 17, 2009, 12:52:24 AM »

Offline PosImpos

  • NCE
  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12383
  • Tommy Points: 903
  • Rondo = Good
Hudson looks good as in "he maybe could help us in a couple of years after House is gone" but i don't see how he cracks the rotation or even dresses on most nights with Eddie House healthy.  You simply cannot play them together in the backcourt nor would you want to with Marquis here. 

I see him as a Will Bynum-type who could make it when he finds the right situation to get his minutes in a specific role off the bench......those minutes aren't available for a rookie on a team with championship aspirations. 



Dude, if Hudson ever plays as well as Bynum, that would be freaking awesome.

Of course, Bynum had to play in Isreal for a few years first so...hopefully that's not necessary for Hudson.
Never forget the Champs of '08, or the gutsy warriors of '10.

"I know you all wanna win, but you gotta do it TOGETHER!"
- Doc Rivers

Re: Lester Hudson is a keeper
« Reply #164 on: October 17, 2009, 06:37:00 AM »

Offline Surferdad

  • Reggie Lewis
  • ***************
  • Posts: 15280
  • Tommy Points: 1038
  • "He fiddles...and diddles..."
Hudson looks good as in "he maybe could help us in a couple of years after House is gone" but i don't see how he cracks the rotation or even dresses on most nights with Eddie House healthy.  You simply cannot play them together in the backcourt nor would you want to with Marquis here. 

I see him as a Will Bynum-type who could make it when he finds the right situation to get his minutes in a specific role off the bench......those minutes aren't available for a rookie on a team with championship aspirations. 

Are you just saying this because of Marbury? Hudson looks like he can actually defend. And, you could have Eddie guard the 1s while Hudson guards the 2s while Daniels plays the 3.

In the end, Daniels probably will be the point forward for the 2nd unit while Hudson's eased into becoming a PG in the D-league, but I don't necessarily buy that Hudson can't play alongside House defensively.

This is a slippery slope for Hudson. HRB has a valid point as usual with the duplication of Eddie House type skills. OTOH, if Hudson gets in the game a couple of times and makes a few shots, a few stops and minimal mistakes in a few short minutes lined up next to Eddie and Marquis??........ 

He could force his way into the rotation. His defense will be the key, just like it will with JR Giddens. If he outplays Eddie defensively and proves he can cover most of the two guards adequately then he has a shot.

Of course, if he gets in and looks like a bad Tony Allen impersonator that will also seal his role into stone. It will be nearly impossible for him to be mistake free as a rookie. The odds are certainly not in his favor.

I mostly agree, except I don't think Hudson duplicates House's skills very much.  Hudson is a better creator off the dribble while House has more shooting range.  That said, I agree that his defense will be key to getting minutes, and that would likely take minutes from House because Daniels to too valuable and versatile not to play.