Author Topic: 2009 Celticsblog Draft: Voting Analysis : Team of the Future  (Read 672732 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: 2009 Celticsblog Draft: Playoff Voting Analysis Thread
« Reply #1170 on: August 13, 2009, 10:29:42 PM »

Offline RebusRankin

  • Satch Sanders
  • *********
  • Posts: 9143
  • Tommy Points: 923
I'm curious too how Charlotte who starts 3 rookies and a second year player with youngsters off the bench and a young cuba team finish ahead of Toronto.

Re: 2009 Celticsblog Draft: Playoff Voting Analysis Thread
« Reply #1171 on: August 13, 2009, 10:39:00 PM »

Offline dark_lord

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8808
  • Tommy Points: 1126
athleticism and penetration ability

Re: 2009 Celticsblog Draft: Playoff Voting Analysis Thread
« Reply #1172 on: August 13, 2009, 10:58:04 PM »

Offline bdm860

  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6138
  • Tommy Points: 4624
I speak for nobody but myself but in real life a team with Gilbert Arenas, Caron Butler, and Antawn Jamison finished last in their conference.  Also a team with Baron Davis, Marcus Camby, Chris Kaman, Eric Gordon, Al Thorton fishined with the same amount of wins and finished second to last in their conference.

If Garnett doesn't come back healthy and misses the majority of next season and Artest goes AWOL, both very real possibilites, then I could definitely see how someone could view Toronto on the same level as real life LAC and Washington - who finished last and second to last in their conferences.  Did any NBA analysts pick Washington to finish dead last last year? Yet it still happened.  Maybe DL thinks Garnett will miss a lot of time next year(he mentioned his health and he's old) and maybe DL thinks Artest will go crazy and leave the team (he mentioned how Artest is unpredictable and makes teams implode), if he factored Garnett and Artest out of the equation (both of them not being with their teams next year is not outside the realm of possibility) then I could easily see how someone could view Toronto as a last place team.  Just like real life LAC or Washington.

After 18 months with their Bigs, the Littles were: 46% less likely to use illegal drugs, 27% less likely to use alcohol, 52% less likely to skip school, 37% less likely to skip a class

Re: 2009 Celticsblog Draft: Playoff Voting Analysis Thread
« Reply #1173 on: August 13, 2009, 11:00:09 PM »

Offline KCattheStripe

  • Danny Ainge
  • **********
  • Posts: 10726
  • Tommy Points: 830
I speak for nobody but myself but in real life a team with Gilbert Arenas, Caron Butler, and Antawn Jamison finished last in their conference.  Also a team with Baron Davis, Marcus Camby, Chris Kaman, Eric Gordon, Al Thorton fishined with the same amount of wins and finished second to last in their conference.

If Garnett doesn't come back healthy and misses the majority of next season and Artest goes AWOL, both very real possibilites, then I could definitely see how someone could view Toronto on the same level as real life LAC and Washington - who finished last and second to last in their conferences.  Did any NBA analysts pick Washington to finish dead last last year? Yet it still happened.  Maybe DL thinks Garnett will miss a lot of time next year(he mentioned his health and he's old) and maybe DL thinks Artest will go crazy and leave the team (he mentioned how Artest is unpredictable and makes teams implode), if he factored Garnett and Artest out of the equation (both of them not being with their teams next year is not outside the realm of possibility) then I could easily see how someone could view Toronto as a last place team.  Just like real life LAC or Washington.

Give that man a cookie.

Re: 2009 Celticsblog Draft: Playoff Voting Analysis Thread
« Reply #1174 on: August 13, 2009, 11:03:05 PM »

Offline Donoghus

  • Global Moderator
  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32681
  • Tommy Points: 1732
  • What a Pub Should Be
After looking over the circumstances and taking all factors into consideration, I'm going to disallow the vote.  Please respect my decision and I would appreciate it if everyone would refrain going after parties involved and just let it go. 

This wasn't an easy decision but I feel its in the best interests of this month-long draft to disallow the vote.


2010 CB Historical Draft - Best Overall Team

Re: 2009 Celticsblog Draft: Playoff Voting Analysis Thread
« Reply #1175 on: August 13, 2009, 11:04:13 PM »

Offline celtsrp33

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1313
  • Tommy Points: 281
After looking over the circumstances and taking all factors into consideration, I'm going to disallow the vote.  Please respect my decision and I would appreciate it if everyone would refrain going after parties involved and just let it go. 

This wasn't an easy decision but I feel its in the best interests of this month-long draft to disallow the vote.


Hey Dons,

That was your 6000th post!  Congrats!
Owner of Make Me Some Bacon in CB FBB points and H2H leagues.

Re: 2009 Celticsblog Draft: Playoff Voting Analysis Thread
« Reply #1176 on: August 13, 2009, 11:04:55 PM »

Offline Roy Hobbs

  • In The Rafters
  • The Natural
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 33333
  • Tommy Points: 6430
  • Doc could learn a thing or two from Norman Dale
After looking over the circumstances and taking all factors into consideration, I'm going to disallow the vote.  Please respect my decision and I would appreciate it if everyone would refrain going after parties involved and just let it go. 

This wasn't an easy decision but I feel its in the best interests of this month-long draft to disallow the vote.


Hey Dons,

That was your 6000th post!  Congrats!

Welcome to the Don Nelson club, Dons.

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

Portland CrotoNats:  2009 CB Draft Champions

Re: 2009 Celticsblog Draft: Playoff Voting Analysis Thread
« Reply #1177 on: August 13, 2009, 11:06:10 PM »

Offline indeedproceed

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 42585
  • Tommy Points: 2756
  • You ain't the boss of the freakin' bedclothes.
Congrats and I agree with the choice. Right move.

"You've gotta respect a 15-percent 3-point shooter. A guy
like that is always lethal." - Evan 'The God' Turner

Re: 2009 Celticsblog Draft: Playoff Voting Analysis Thread
« Reply #1178 on: August 13, 2009, 11:10:50 PM »

Offline nickagneta

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48121
  • Tommy Points: 8800
  • President of Jaylen Brown Fan Club
The vote would not have effected the order of finish of the top 4 teams Dons.

Disqualifying that vote now calls into question some other fairly strange placings doesn't it? Why are those allowed?

Shouldn't we just let every vote count?

Re: 2009 Celticsblog Draft: Playoff Voting Analysis Thread
« Reply #1179 on: August 13, 2009, 11:12:18 PM »

Offline dark_lord

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8808
  • Tommy Points: 1126
The vote would not have effected the order of finish of the top 4 teams Dons.

Disqualifying that vote now calls into question some other fairly strange placings doesn't it? Why are those allowed?

Shouldn't we just let every vote count?

its all good nick.  the decision was made, dons took care of it like a stand up guy thru pm's and whatnot. 

im cool with it and have let it go.

Re: 2009 Celticsblog Draft: Playoff Voting Analysis Thread
« Reply #1180 on: August 13, 2009, 11:12:35 PM »

Offline celtsrp33

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1313
  • Tommy Points: 281
I truly believe that although the Heat are very young, many people are taking that too far.  We have very good balance - much more than many other teams.  We have a nice inside game with the combo of Hawes, Thomas, Speights; a good distributor in Felton; some good slashers and shooters with Young, Outlaw, Harden, Batum and Redick and we are super athletic.  I just think we are being written off/overlooked because of age.  This is a team that could make a run at an 8 seed in my opinion (even though my voting may not show it)

I just don't believe we are a 14 or 15 team in the east.  
Owner of Make Me Some Bacon in CB FBB points and H2H leagues.

Re: 2009 Celticsblog Draft: Playoff Voting Analysis Thread
« Reply #1181 on: August 13, 2009, 11:17:16 PM »

Offline nickagneta

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48121
  • Tommy Points: 8800
  • President of Jaylen Brown Fan Club
I truly believe that although the Heat are very young, many people are taking that too far.  We have very good balance - much more than many other teams.  We have a nice inside game with the combo of Hawes, Thomas, Speights; a good distributor in Felton; some good slashers and shooters with Young, Outlaw, Harden, Batum and Redick and we are super athletic.  I just think we are being written off/overlooked because of age.  This is a team that could make a run at an 8 seed in my opinion (even though my voting may not show it)

I just don't believe we are a 14 or 15 team in the east.  
As Roy noted earlier, take a look at real life Golden State.

Kelenna Azubuike
Andris Biedrins    
Monta Ellis    
Stephen Jackson
Acie Law
Corey Maggette
Anthony Morrow
Anthony Randolph
Ronny Turiaf
Brandan Wright

Looks pretty formidable and maybe this year they will be but last year they were young, inexperienced and bad.

That said, I think you have one of the 3 best future teams in the league, Cuba.

Re: 2009 Celticsblog Draft: Playoff Voting Analysis Thread
« Reply #1182 on: August 13, 2009, 11:24:42 PM »

Offline nickagneta

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 48121
  • Tommy Points: 8800
  • President of Jaylen Brown Fan Club
Ran some numbers and I have the results if anyone wants a tally PM me.

Re: 2009 Celticsblog Draft: Playoff Voting Analysis Thread
« Reply #1183 on: August 14, 2009, 12:04:16 AM »

Offline Roy Hobbs

  • In The Rafters
  • The Natural
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 33333
  • Tommy Points: 6430
  • Doc could learn a thing or two from Norman Dale
Ran some numbers and I have the results if anyone wants a tally PM me.

It's probably okay to post an "unofficial" tally for the East, now that voting has been locked.

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

Portland CrotoNats:  2009 CB Draft Champions

Re: 2009 Celticsblog Draft: Playoff Voting Analysis Thread
« Reply #1184 on: August 14, 2009, 12:06:31 AM »

Offline bucknersrevenge

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1967
  • Tommy Points: 170
since i have been asked to validate toronto as my last place team, here it goes:


i believe their bench is very week. big z and finley are over the hill and dont bring much to the table.  barea is ok, but is very undersized.  i think he had some success bc he caught people off guard, but now teams know how to play him. belinelli is overrated on these boards.  he is very soft...a physical guard would kill him.  warrick is average at best.  maynor and griffin are garbage, imo.

andre miller is vastly overrated.  he pounds the ball too much and is average at best. he would be a solid backup but not as a starter, imo.  garcia is a role player off the bench, solid, but nothing more than average, imo.  artest is very good, but he is a wildcard.  i wouldnt want him on my team if i were a gm bc he is unpredictable and has a history of imploding teams.  kg, their best player is coming of a major knee injury and is an older player (love him, but being objective).  camby is another player vastly overrated in these boards.  solid defender, but not a lockdown big, imo bc of his lack of strength and size. he brings nothing offensively. 

a few great defenders, but only decent defensively as a team. but they lack good offensive power. should have kept arenas, instead of trading for miller.

Not sure I agree with that but what I think doesn't matter. I respect the hell outta that answer. "That's my answer. You don't like it. That's a personal problem". I love it dl.
Never underestimate the predictability of stupidity...