Author Topic: Chad ford rumor--C's/Kings  (Read 23613 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Chad ford rumor--C's/Kings
« Reply #75 on: February 19, 2009, 01:41:09 PM »

Offline BudweiserCeltic

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19003
  • Tommy Points: 1833
What is being overlooked here is that while Noccioni is more expensive than Posey, we wouldn't be paying Scal's contract next since this is a trade not an additional player. That's 3 million (6 if we are in luxury land).

So financially is not as bad as some are making it out to be when compared to what would've been Posey's deal.

Re: Chad ford rumor--C's/Kings
« Reply #76 on: February 19, 2009, 01:42:00 PM »

Offline guava_wrench

  • Satch Sanders
  • *********
  • Posts: 9931
  • Tommy Points: 777
I think Noccioni would be a fit IF we can sign both Marbury and Smith.

But
Noccioni is making 8 mil for 4 years I think, thats a lot of salary and will make it hard for the celtics to make many moves in the future .

I think there a lot better options as a wing who are a lot cheaper , but do the same kinds of things

I think Matt Barnes could be had for relatively cheap and is oly making 700K
Why would Phx trade Barnes? He is on a one year contract, is cheep, and he plays a lot. We have nothing to offer them in return, especially since they need shooters again now that they will run.

Re: Chad ford rumor--C's/Kings
« Reply #77 on: February 19, 2009, 01:42:56 PM »

Offline Roy Hobbs

  • In The Rafters
  • The Natural
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 33333
  • Tommy Points: 6430
  • Doc could learn a thing or two from Norman Dale
The Globe is reporting that the Celts have interest in signing Calvin booth.  Who knows, maybe it could be in conjunction with a Nocioni deal.

(The rumor has been scuttled, but you never know.)

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

Portland CrotoNats:  2009 CB Draft Champions

Re: Chad ford rumor--C's/Kings
« Reply #78 on: February 19, 2009, 01:52:35 PM »

Offline greg_kite

  • Jayson Tatum
  • Posts: 851
  • Tommy Points: 71
I'm on the fence about this one.  Can they take Baby out of the deal and include a re-signed Pollard?  That I would do in a second.

Re: Chad ford rumor--C's/Kings
« Reply #79 on: February 19, 2009, 01:55:00 PM »

Offline cordobes

  • NCE
  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3556
  • Tommy Points: 576
  • Basketball is like chess, only without the dice
What is being overlooked here is that while Noccioni is more expensive than Posey, we wouldn't be paying Scal's contract next since this is a trade not an additional player. That's 3 million (6 if we are in luxury land).

So financially is not as bad as some are making it out to be when compared to what would've been Posey's deal.

Posey got a $25 million contract. Nocioni's making $29 million in the same period. This upsets Scal's contract. Plus, we're giving Big Baby away.

But as someone who never took seriously the "oh, that single season of a MLE contract in 2012 will kill our future" rationale I see your point.

Re: Chad ford rumor--C's/Kings
« Reply #80 on: February 19, 2009, 01:59:15 PM »

Offline guava_wrench

  • Satch Sanders
  • *********
  • Posts: 9931
  • Tommy Points: 777
What is being overlooked here is that while Noccioni is more expensive than Posey, we wouldn't be paying Scal's contract next since this is a trade not an additional player. That's 3 million (6 if we are in luxury land).

So financially is not as bad as some are making it out to be when compared to what would've been Posey's deal.

Posey got a $25 million contract. Nocioni's making $29 million in the same period. This upsets Scal's contract. Plus, we're giving Big Baby away.

But as someone who never took seriously the "oh, that single season of a MLE contract in 2012 will kill our future" rationale I see your point.
The important point is that we already considered Posey's contract too rich. Even the offer we made was artificially rich since he was a known commodity for us.

We would need a replacement for BBD's defense against big centers.

Re: Chad ford rumor--C's/Kings
« Reply #81 on: February 19, 2009, 02:01:46 PM »

Offline celticmaestro

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4558
  • Tommy Points: 81
  • "Love is the soul of a true Irishman"
What is being overlooked here is that while Noccioni is more expensive than Posey, we wouldn't be paying Scal's contract next since this is a trade not an additional player. That's 3 million (6 if we are in luxury land).

So financially is not as bad as some are making it out to be when compared to what would've been Posey's deal.

Posey got a $25 million contract. Nocioni's making $29 million in the same period. This upsets Scal's contract. Plus, we're giving Big Baby away.

But as someone who never took seriously the "oh, that single season of a MLE contract in 2012 will kill our future" rationale I see your point.
The important point is that we already considered Posey's contract too rich. Even the offer we made was artificially rich since he was a known commodity for us.

We would need a replacement for BBD's defense against big centers.

Yeah, we'd need someone to replace the way he lets big centers shoot over him and basically do what they want (see Gasol, Pau)...

Big fatty is average at best and I'd love to see him gone.

Re: Chad ford rumor--C's/Kings
« Reply #82 on: February 19, 2009, 02:06:20 PM »

Offline crownsy

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8469
  • Tommy Points: 157
What is being overlooked here is that while Noccioni is more expensive than Posey, we wouldn't be paying Scal's contract next since this is a trade not an additional player. That's 3 million (6 if we are in luxury land).

So financially is not as bad as some are making it out to be when compared to what would've been Posey's deal.

Posey got a $25 million contract. Nocioni's making $29 million in the same period. This upsets Scal's contract. Plus, we're giving Big Baby away.

But as someone who never took seriously the "oh, that single season of a MLE contract in 2012 will kill our future" rationale I see your point.
The important point is that we already considered Posey's contract too rich. Even the offer we made was artificially rich since he was a known commodity for us.

We would need a replacement for BBD's defense against big centers.

Yeah, we'd need someone to replace the way he lets big centers shoot over him and basically do what they want (see Gasol, Pau)...

Big fatty is average at best and I'd love to see him gone.

so you think leon is a better choice at C post this trade? i dont. he's got all of big babies flaws, and doesn't even have the "fat" to at least try to keep guys out of the paint.
“I will hurt you for this. A day will come when you think you’re safe and happy and your joy will turn to ashes in your mouth. And you will know the debt is paid.” – Tyrion

Re: Chad ford rumor--C's/Kings
« Reply #83 on: February 19, 2009, 02:09:45 PM »

Offline celticmaestro

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4558
  • Tommy Points: 81
  • "Love is the soul of a true Irishman"
What is being overlooked here is that while Noccioni is more expensive than Posey, we wouldn't be paying Scal's contract next since this is a trade not an additional player. That's 3 million (6 if we are in luxury land).

So financially is not as bad as some are making it out to be when compared to what would've been Posey's deal.

Posey got a $25 million contract. Nocioni's making $29 million in the same period. This upsets Scal's contract. Plus, we're giving Big Baby away.

But as someone who never took seriously the "oh, that single season of a MLE contract in 2012 will kill our future" rationale I see your point.
The important point is that we already considered Posey's contract too rich. Even the offer we made was artificially rich since he was a known commodity for us.

We would need a replacement for BBD's defense against big centers.

Yeah, we'd need someone to replace the way he lets big centers shoot over him and basically do what they want (see Gasol, Pau)...

Big fatty is average at best and I'd love to see him gone.

so you think leon is a better choice at C post this trade? i dont. he's got all of big babies flaws, and doesn't even have the "fat" to at least try to keep guys out of the paint.

No I'd bank on us signing someone else. Booth? Smith? Anyone. When KG went out against LA, we put Davis on Gasol and he was tormented. That was the nail in the coffin for me, he's got a lot to prove in my book.

Re: Chad ford rumor--C's/Kings
« Reply #84 on: February 19, 2009, 02:14:36 PM »

Offline BudweiserCeltic

  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19003
  • Tommy Points: 1833
What is being overlooked here is that while Noccioni is more expensive than Posey, we wouldn't be paying Scal's contract next since this is a trade not an additional player. That's 3 million (6 if we are in luxury land).

So financially is not as bad as some are making it out to be when compared to what would've been Posey's deal.

Posey got a $25 million contract. Nocioni's making $29 million in the same period. This upsets Scal's contract. Plus, we're giving Big Baby away.

But as someone who never took seriously the "oh, that single season of a MLE contract in 2012 will kill our future" rationale I see your point.
The important point is that we already considered Posey's contract too rich. Even the offer we made was artificially rich since he was a known commodity for us.

We would need a replacement for BBD's defense against big centers.

Yeah, we'd need someone to replace the way he lets big centers shoot over him and basically do what they want (see Gasol, Pau)...

Big fatty is average at best and I'd love to see him gone.

All good, if we ignore his contributions like the ones against Dwight Howard.

Re: Chad ford rumor--C's/Kings
« Reply #85 on: February 19, 2009, 02:16:18 PM »

Offline KungPoweChicken

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2102
  • Tommy Points: 228
I'd do this deal without batting an eyelash.

Re: Chad ford rumor--C's/Kings
« Reply #86 on: February 19, 2009, 02:16:46 PM »

Offline Evantime34

  • NCE
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11942
  • Tommy Points: 764
  • Eagerly Awaiting the Next Fantasy Draft
If we do this trade a 4 for one, then you have to assume we'll sign other players. Let's say we can bring back Noccioni, Marbury, and Booth after trading POB, Baby, TA and Scal. IMO that makes us a heck of a lot better.
Also now that Joe Smith isn't getting traded what is the likelihood that he gets bought out?
DKC:  Rockets
CB Draft: Memphis Grizz
Players: Klay Thompson, Jabari Parker, Aaron Gordon
Next 3 picks: 4.14, 4.15, 4.19

Re: Chad ford rumor--C's/Kings
« Reply #87 on: February 19, 2009, 02:17:16 PM »

Offline Andy Jick

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3795
  • Tommy Points: 89
  • You know my methods, Watson.
Nocioni is being paid twice what he's worth.

...as are 75% of the players in the nba.  there is typically no such thing as the perfect trade or the perfect contract.

nocioni, though it's looking like this won't happen, would be a nice player that would provide a solid player next to KG and pierce up front, possibly adding longevity to their careers.

i don't want this celtics team to become what the '80s celtics became: old and tired...nocioni is the kind of player to make sure that wouldn't happen so easily.
"It was easier to know it than to explain why I know it."

Re: Chad ford rumor--C's/Kings
« Reply #88 on: February 19, 2009, 02:18:57 PM »

Offline greenwise

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1117
  • Tommy Points: 136
Nocioni would be awesome. It seems unlikely though...only 42 minutes remaining...

Re: Chad ford rumor--C's/Kings
« Reply #89 on: February 19, 2009, 02:19:06 PM »

Offline BillfromBoston

  • Author
  • Al Horford
  • Posts: 498
  • Tommy Points: 79
What is being overlooked here is that while Noccioni is more expensive than Posey, we wouldn't be paying Scal's contract next since this is a trade not an additional player. That's 3 million (6 if we are in luxury land).

So financially is not as bad as some are making it out to be when compared to what would've been Posey's deal.

Posey got a $25 million contract. Nocioni's making $29 million in the same period. This upsets Scal's contract. Plus, we're giving Big Baby away.

But as someone who never took seriously the "oh, that single season of a MLE contract in 2012 will kill our future" rationale I see your point.

Nocioni is a more effective PF than Posey and is far more of an offensive threat - he's a true 6th man, not a specialist type - if Boston did do this deal, (highly doubt it,) it would be completely different than signing Posey.

It wasn't about the $$ with Posey, it was about the value Posey brought relative to the role he'd fill. Nocioni is more valuable at his price, but he's still likely too expensive to justify...

What i'd like to know is this: If Boston ends up getting Joe Smith and Stephon Marbury, what is everyone going to have to say for themselves that Edited.  Profanity and masked profanity are against forum rules and may result in discipline.ed about the past off-season and Danny "screwing up?"

The plan was clearly always about playing the trade and waiver wire game, so if it pays off then it looks like he did his job well...