Author Topic: The Boston Clippers  (Read 24716 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: The Boston Clippers
« Reply #75 on: July 01, 2008, 03:15:52 PM »

Offline crownsy

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8469
  • Tommy Points: 157
Sure, they put up the big money for Garnett and it worked out for them.  Garnett was terrific.  But now they are nickel and diming everyone else, notwithstanding their hugely profitable championship year.  Piggy piggy piggy.  If Posey doesn't return and if there is an injury to Pierce or Ray Allen, their alternatives right now are Giddens, Pruitt and Bill Walker, whose knees may be as bad as Tony's.

so because they won't offer a player who is the 10th or 11th on thier bench, who also has massive injury concerns, is lackluster on offense, and who's only plus is good defense a vasty overpriced contract, you already know how thier going to handle thier other more valuable free agents? amazing stuff.

i don't really see how A relates to B.

Again, prove to me that he's suddenly going to recover into the guy from that 30 game stretch two and a half years ago.

I can prove pretty convincliy he's not worth a mid level contract of 3 million dollars as currently constructed. call me crazy, but even for a very good defensive gaurd, for 3 million, i'd like to see;

-some sort of jumpshot

- the ability to dribble

- soemthing less than leading the team in 3 bad stats

- be higher than the 11th option off the bench.

“I will hurt you for this. A day will come when you think you’re safe and happy and your joy will turn to ashes in your mouth. And you will know the debt is paid.” – Tyrion

Re: The Boston Clippers
« Reply #76 on: July 01, 2008, 03:26:39 PM »

Offline wdleehi

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34114
  • Tommy Points: 1612
  • Basketball is Newtonian Physics
Does this give Boston more flexibility in using TA in a sign and trade?  What is his max contract the Celtics could use?

We're still subject to the Base Year Compensation rules.  We can give him a 25% raise from last year's salary without worrying about BYC, which is approximately $2.25 million.

So combine him with Scali, Davis (or Powe) and create roughly 6.2 million trade piece.  Keep TA's contract short (2 years) and find a team looking to make room for 2010. 


Some guys with salaries around that mark

Foster
Speedy
Varejao
Gadzuric
Moore
Collison
Daniels.


Not saying the Celtics could make a trade for any or all these guys, but just setting a good base as to what could be the level at that amount. 

Re: The Boston Clippers
« Reply #77 on: July 01, 2008, 03:29:50 PM »

Offline crownsy

  • Don Nelson
  • ********
  • Posts: 8469
  • Tommy Points: 157
yea WDL, i'd like that.

I'm not opposed to TA comign back, i'm opposed to this view that the celtics are satan if it's not at 3 million dollars.

In my opinion, there going to make a run at TA, but have determined, correctly i think, that his value is more like 1.5 million for 2-3 years.

now some other team might give him 3 or 4 million for 5 years or something, but to me, it makes perfect sense for the celtics not to extend TA an overpriced saftey net in case that team doesn't come calling.

The high handness in this thread is out of this world.
“I will hurt you for this. A day will come when you think you’re safe and happy and your joy will turn to ashes in your mouth. And you will know the debt is paid.” – Tyrion

Re: The Boston Clippers
« Reply #78 on: July 01, 2008, 03:47:12 PM »

Offline EJPLAYA

  • NCE
  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3816
  • Tommy Points: 127
Sure, they put up the big money for Garnett and it worked out for them.  Garnett was terrific.  But now they are nickel and diming everyone else, notwithstanding their hugely profitable championship year.  Piggy piggy piggy.  If Posey doesn't return and if there is an injury to Pierce or Ray Allen, their alternatives right now are Giddens, Pruitt and Bill Walker, whose knees may be as bad as Tony's.

Could it possibly be that you just aren't being honest with yourself in your assessment of Tony's current value and abilities? Could it be that the C's are doing the "right thing" by TA for his free agent chances in saying outwardly that they value TA and want him back so that another team will be more likely to sign the guy?! The alternative would be to speak the truth which is that TA is an athletic shell of his former self that may not return to anywhere near the physical specimen he was at one time. That he has a huge amount of flaws and deficiencies in his game at his best, therefore to commit anything other than chump change would be a stupid move by the Celtics organization. This would have been speaking the truth about the guy and would have hurt his value in the marketplace. Maybe the C's were trying to do the right thing by saying what they did and putting a positive spin out there for him. The glass may not be half empty Brick...

Re: The Boston Clippers
« Reply #79 on: July 01, 2008, 03:51:55 PM »

Offline cordobes

  • NCE
  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3556
  • Tommy Points: 576
  • Basketball is like chess, only without the dice
Does this give Boston more flexibility in using TA in a sign and trade?  What is his max contract the Celtics could use?

We're still subject to the Base Year Compensation rules.  We can give him a 25% raise from last year's salary without worrying about BYC, which is approximately $2.25 million.

So combine him with Scali, Davis (or Powe) and create roughly 6.2 million trade piece.  Keep TA's contract short (2 years) and find a team looking to make room for 2010. 


Some guys with salaries around that mark

Foster
Speedy
Varejao
Gadzuric
Moore
Collison
Daniels.


Not saying the Celtics could make a trade for any or all these guys, but just setting a good base as to what could be the level at that amount. 

I've been researching that for big men. Gadzuric is all that you can get. He's the only one with 3 years left in the books. Not sure if I want to trade for another winger to stay with Garnett/Powe/Perkins/LLE Center as the only post players.

Re: The Boston Clippers
« Reply #80 on: July 01, 2008, 03:57:56 PM »

Offline cdif911

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4868
  • Tommy Points: 43
wait a minute, maybe Tony Allen hacked into Brick's computer....or maybe Brick is Tony Allen.... trying to drive up his price, very tricky Tony, very tricky indeed
When you love life, life loves you right back


Re: The Boston Clippers
« Reply #81 on: July 01, 2008, 04:53:01 PM »

Offline RockinRyA

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5572
  • Tommy Points: 699
i thought we had a boston counterpart to LA's clippers. or i thought we had brand and kaman for cheap  :D

im a big fan of tony. but i dont think hes worth that much. they may want to keep him, but for less.

Re: The Boston Clippers
« Reply #82 on: July 01, 2008, 05:07:48 PM »

Offline BrickJames

  • Bill Walton
  • *
  • Posts: 1406
  • Tommy Points: 185
  • Master Mason
I realize that Tony Allen has his supporters and detractors on this forum, but failing to extend a qualifying offer to Tony Allen is a cheap, chintzy move that is beneath the Celtics franchise.  It's like something Donald Sterling and the Clippers would do.

Tony Allen is a heck of a defender and has been a good teammate.  Even his detractors remember how well he was playing before his injury.  And $2.7 million is peanuts by NBA standards (even if you take the luxury tax into account), especially for a 4th year player with TA's skills.

And to make matters worse, Rivers lied when asked about Tony Allen.  He said that he wanted him back, and implied that the club was interested in having Tony back.  He said that Giddens was not drafted to replace TA. 

Ubuntu or no ubuntu, Rivers is a prevaricating snake who talks out of both sides of his mouth.  As in the situation where he lied about the reasons why Telfair did not return for the second half in NY, he just made matters worse by being untruthful.

If I were James Posey, I would think long and hard about entering into a long-term contract with a franchise capable of acting in this matter.  Shame on you, Celtics.



I stand by what I said over a month ago - if TA has an NBA contract come the beginning of the regular season, I will quit posting on all forums forever.

Why is this a classless move to the Celts?  What does the Celtics organization owe Tony Allen?

I'll give you a hint: it begins with 'N' and ends in 'othing'.
God bless and good night!


Re: The Boston Clippers
« Reply #83 on: July 01, 2008, 05:17:20 PM »

Offline Redz

  • Punner
  • Global Moderator
  • Red Auerbach
  • *******************************
  • Posts: 31742
  • Tommy Points: 3845
  • Yup
I'll give you a hint: it begins with 'N' and ends in 'othing'.

Can I use my lifeline on this one?
Yup

Re: The Boston Clippers
« Reply #84 on: July 01, 2008, 05:19:06 PM »

Offline wdleehi

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34114
  • Tommy Points: 1612
  • Basketball is Newtonian Physics
I realize that Tony Allen has his supporters and detractors on this forum, but failing to extend a qualifying offer to Tony Allen is a cheap, chintzy move that is beneath the Celtics franchise.  It's like something Donald Sterling and the Clippers would do.

Tony Allen is a heck of a defender and has been a good teammate.  Even his detractors remember how well he was playing before his injury.  And $2.7 million is peanuts by NBA standards (even if you take the luxury tax into account), especially for a 4th year player with TA's skills.

And to make matters worse, Rivers lied when asked about Tony Allen.  He said that he wanted him back, and implied that the club was interested in having Tony back.  He said that Giddens was not drafted to replace TA. 

Ubuntu or no ubuntu, Rivers is a prevaricating snake who talks out of both sides of his mouth.  As in the situation where he lied about the reasons why Telfair did not return for the second half in NY, he just made matters worse by being untruthful.

If I were James Posey, I would think long and hard about entering into a long-term contract with a franchise capable of acting in this matter.  Shame on you, Celtics.



I stand by what I said over a month ago - if TA has an NBA contract come the beginning of the regular season, I will quit posting on all forums forever.

Why is this a classless move to the Celts?  What does the Celtics organization owe Tony Allen?

I'll give you a hint: it begins with 'N' and ends in 'othing'.


New Clothing?

Re: The Boston Clippers
« Reply #85 on: July 01, 2008, 05:19:20 PM »

Offline cdif911

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4868
  • Tommy Points: 43
I realize that Tony Allen has his supporters and detractors on this forum, but failing to extend a qualifying offer to Tony Allen is a cheap, chintzy move that is beneath the Celtics franchise.  It's like something Donald Sterling and the Clippers would do.

Tony Allen is a heck of a defender and has been a good teammate.  Even his detractors remember how well he was playing before his injury.  And $2.7 million is peanuts by NBA standards (even if you take the luxury tax into account), especially for a 4th year player with TA's skills.

And to make matters worse, Rivers lied when asked about Tony Allen.  He said that he wanted him back, and implied that the club was interested in having Tony back.  He said that Giddens was not drafted to replace TA. 

Ubuntu or no ubuntu, Rivers is a prevaricating snake who talks out of both sides of his mouth.  As in the situation where he lied about the reasons why Telfair did not return for the second half in NY, he just made matters worse by being untruthful.

If I were James Posey, I would think long and hard about entering into a long-term contract with a franchise capable of acting in this matter.  Shame on you, Celtics.



I stand by what I said over a month ago - if TA has an NBA contract come the beginning of the regular season, I will quit posting on all forums forever.

Why is this a classless move to the Celts?  What does the Celtics organization owe Tony Allen?

I'll give you a hint: it begins with 'N' and ends in 'othing'.

No need to quit the forums, he probably will get some sort of deal... just not likely here
When you love life, life loves you right back


Re: The Boston Clippers
« Reply #86 on: July 01, 2008, 05:23:28 PM »

Offline cdif911

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4868
  • Tommy Points: 43


I'll give you a hint: it begins with 'N' and ends in 'othing'.


New Clothing?
[/quote]

how bout No Clothing - wooo, we're going streaking!
When you love life, life loves you right back


Re: The Boston Clippers
« Reply #87 on: July 01, 2008, 05:24:58 PM »

Offline wdleehi

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34114
  • Tommy Points: 1612
  • Basketball is Newtonian Physics
Quote

I'll give you a hint: it begins with 'N' and ends in 'othing'.


New Clothing?

how bout No Clothing - wooo, we're going streaking!


Hey!  This is a family site!  You must have on at least a speedo!    :-X

Re: The Boston Clippers
« Reply #88 on: July 01, 2008, 05:27:26 PM »

Offline Redz

  • Punner
  • Global Moderator
  • Red Auerbach
  • *******************************
  • Posts: 31742
  • Tommy Points: 3845
  • Yup
Quote

I'll give you a hint: it begins with 'N' and ends in 'othing'.


New Clothing?

how bout No Clothing - wooo, we're going streaking!


Hey!  This is a family site!  You must have on at least a speedo!    :-X

Save it for the Pageant bucko!
Yup

Re: The Boston Clippers
« Reply #89 on: July 01, 2008, 05:37:17 PM »

Offline goz421

  • Brad Stevens
  • Posts: 217
  • Tommy Points: 34
Is the op nuts.  Tont Allen sucks and is a few steps from being out of the NBA.  He is injury prone and completely inconsistent.  Time to develop new talent.  Get magette