Brogdon was great for us last year and a good 3rd option.
All this negativity is just recency bias because he was injured against Miami
Yeah, I think there are two separate arguments:
1. Did Brogdon meet expectations last year? I think he did. He was 6MOY and was a great shooter, better than we could have hoped for. His overall defense wasn't as good as I'd hoped, but he was a really, really good player. Definitely worth Nesmith and a #1.
2. What Brogdon would we have been getting in 2023-24? This is the harder question. We don't know if he's fully recovered from injury. We don't know how much his injuries contributed to some really poor defense in the playoffs (even before the Finals). And, most concerning, we don't know where his head was at after the KP trade fell through. Brad has acknowledged he was "angry", and reports are that Brogdon wanted a fresh start. The "healing" process was still ongoing, despite several months of time passing.
In combination, I think it's fair to conclude that Brogdon was a really good Celtic that was a diminished asset heading into 2024. To me, that's why the Jrue trade makes a ton of sense.
I think a few fans are (perhaps subconsciously) viewing this like we're giving up peak Brogdon + peak Timelord. While there's certainly a possibility that both guys perform at a very high level going forward, I think the odds are against it.