here's the flip side. Say the C's lose the title because they can't get any scoring off the bench. What if White's good game is the anomaly this postseason and we lose out because the bench and bench scoring costs us? Do those that love this trade start to wonder if the price was worth it -- particularly next year if White's offense doesn't improve?
In the playoffs, 8 games, 6 W, 2 L, White is +4.6 per game, behind only Horford (+7.3) and Tatum (+5.5). He is doing that while shooting 36% overall and 25% from 3. Per 36 +/-, White is tied with Horford at +7.4, the best on the team of the regular players. White is only playing 22 minutes or so per game whereas Horford is 35 and Tatum is 41.
In terms of bench scoring, White is only adding 7 pts per game. Bench scoring does not seem to be impacting wins so much.
I am not sure that I would go as far as saying that I love the trade but I will say that I love the results that have occurred when White is on the floor. I am admittedly fascinated by the apparent contradiction between White's traditional stats and how the team does when he is on the floor. 8 playoff games (181 minutes) is a pretty good sample size.
Smart has traditionally been a similar player in that regard. Low 3pt shooting, turnovers, and other things but then the team would win when he was on the floor. White is this but to a much greater degree. I don't ever remember a player being able to contribute so much so quietly, so far under the radar. It doesn't seem possible while shooting 25% from 3 and maybe it won't last but for now, it is working remarkably well.