IF Tatum is being discussed in a potential deal, then Hayward needs as much burn and opportunity as possible.
Either put him in as the starting SG, or move Tatum to the PF spot(Dont like that idea) or the BEST idea - Make a trade for a starting center
Vucevic
Bam
Dedmon
Bryant
even Okafor
someone that youo can make a deal for, ideally on the cheap, that puts Horf at the PF spot and opens touches for Hayward.
Rozier for Bryant
Rozier and Yabusele for Bryant and Dekker
Rozier and Williams for Bryant and Satoransky
You seem to be an extremely reactive to every rumor you hear. Danny plays the long game and has patience.
Ainge has been working on getting Davis for
years, keeping communications open and accumulating the types of assets that Demps would want for Davis. Ainge doesn't throw away all that work for a last minute, over reaction to Baynes being hurt, mid season trade of a center who will be a free agent at season's end and who doesn't fit the Celtics system in Vucevic.
Those other centers are worse than Baynes and I don't see any being starters, just as I don't see Baynes as a starter.
Actually not sure why we need to change the starting five at all. That group is the 2nd best starting group in the league after GSW.
As for giving Hayward more minutes. He is getting about 27mpg now. His usage rate is around 20%. I think his minutes are fine. I think he could be more aggressive shooting and running the show when he is out there but at what expense to other players who are currently shooting and scoring more efficiently? I for one have no problem with only two of the four rotational bench having good scoring games. Some nights Brown isn't going to score, others Hayward, yet others Rozier and most probably Baynes won't but sometimes he will. As long as that bench can get about 40-50 points a night as a whole, I don't care who scores.
So if Hayward needs shoot more or be the lead playmaker more great, but he doesn't deserve to be getting 4-5 minutes more a night than Morris, Tatum or Brown.