Friendly reminder that Summer League doesn't really tell you if a player is going to be good... it just kind of shows you who is going to suck.
Consider that the league is made up primarily of undrafted amateurs. Most of the guys playing we ok in College, but not good enough to be drafted. So if you're the #3 pick in the amateur draft, common sense says that you were probably one of the top amateur players. These are the same peers you were better than in College - so you should be better than them in Summer league. If a top draft player DOESN'T put up big stats in Summer league, it's time to start panicking.
Brown looked good. He's supposed to look good. Hopefully it eventually translates to playing against pros.
I disagree. I think the split between draftees and non-draftees might be, say, 40/60, but I'm probably wrong, and while I realize that the summer leagues aren't the be all and end all or anything like that, I'd argue that the guys get to play against much better competition as opposed to what's in the d-league. Think about it, at least in summer league play, most of the top picks are on the court, so it's a good test to see how your guys do against their prospective peersl. Yes, there are many undrafted players, as well, most of whom either land an invite to training camp or end up in the d league, but all of those guys, whether they make it or not, are still the best of the best from the previous season in college basketball, so it's not like draftees are going up against a walk-on who hasn't played all year or any inexperienced guys, lol

. Teams might be able to have their d-league teams run the same plays to facilitate familiarity with the pro-team's playbook, but at the end of the day, they're not even playing against the level of competition in the summer leagues, lol, so it's hard to say that the d-league prepares you for the NBA. I think it actually stunts more than it helps player development, but whatever

.