... Most of the people on this forum simply don't understand what Philly is doing...
LarBrd33 cannot comprehend that everybody understands what Philadelphia is doing.
and, seemingly, he relies upon the opinion of a man who was just demoted. hinkie is on the way out. i see no reason why we should rely upon his quotes about his position to inform us of his future with the 76ers.
76er owership had just told the world what they think of hinkie's plan to date.
If this is true then it is also an admission of what they think of there own plan because ownership signed off on ”the process” from day 1.
I'm not convinced that Hinkie is being totally neutered as a result of the Coangelo move. I think it is an admission that they have lost the battle of public opinion, and that the organization needs help repairing that, and also that ownership now wants phase II of the rebuild to start soon.
The hard part of this process is actually turning all the great assets they've accumulated into a talented basketball team capable of winning games.
Phase II of the rebuild probably would have started this offseason had Embiid been healthy and Saric came over. It'll start this Summer. Unless you consider signing Elton Brand and maybe a couple small-level trades to bring in a PG "the beginning of Phase II", this team will tank until the Summer and deal with it then (as they should... and as they have clearly been planning to do).
I honestly don't even care what Philly does and I'd be happy to see them fall on their faces. As a Celtic fan, I've never had love for Philly. But as long as I see the majority of this board trumpeting around with in accurate view of their situation, I'll probably continue to respond. I don't know how anyone can look at Okafor, Noel, potentially two top 5 picks, Saric, Embiid, two other 1st rounders, various young pieces and unlimited cap space and not understand the type of options PHilly has this Summer... especially considering that every trade idea thread on this board has us moving either Marcus Smart (worse asset than Okafor) and/or the Brooklyn pick (worse asset than Philly's pick) for a star. You'd think those people would be able to understand the value of Philly's hoard. On CelticsBlog there's a broad misunderstanding of Philly's situation fueled by media that caters to casuals and an underlying pro-Boston bias that clouds your logic. There's only a few people here that seem to "get it" with Philly and those are generally the fans that see the value in prospects, draft picks, cap space and have the ability to see the long-term big picture. It doesn't surprise me that respected NBA voices like Zach Lowe, Van Gundy and our own Jeff ( http://www.celticsblog.com/2015/12/9/9878000/here-come-the-sixers-eventually ) seem to understand the big picture... you don't see them trumpeting the whole "Lolz, Philly Failed Ha ha ha" that most folks here like to ramble about.
I'm not going to apologize to anyone here for defending Philly's "plan" as long as I continue to get the impression that most here simply don't understand Philly's "plan". If anyone here thinks they already failed... they don't get it.
The main reason this Philly debate goes on the way it does is because of you.
The suggestion that you need to "correct" anyone on this board is childishly arrogant. You've accused others of being obsessed with you and now you've just admitted the truth that you are obsessed with everyone else.
That's not even the biggest problem, though. The biggest problem is that your posts are so full of ridiculous, non-responsive arguments. There isn't a single intelligent person who would deny that Philly has a lot of valuable assets. You refuse to acknowledge that the ultimate value of those assets is debateable.
Philly has Noel, Embiid and Okafor. Noel looks nothing like a franchise player, Embiid is a medical question mark and Okafor just had a giant red warning flag go up on his off-court behavior. Additionally, they all play the same position and it's unclear if any of them can play effectively on the same court at the same time. Which means at least one or perhaps two of them have to be traded, and if other teams know you have to trade a player it weakens your bargaining position in negotiations.
As of right now, no one knows how good Saric would be in the NBA or when it's absolutely certain he'll even step on an NBA court.
The Lakers are tanking as hard as they can to make sure Philly does not get their pick in the next draft. Even if they fail, Philly could easily wind up with the 4th and 5th picks next year and again miss out on a true franchise-altering superstar.
The other two first rounders they're getting this year look to be in the mid to late 20s, which would make them exactly the type of players Philly's been avoiding like the plague since they'll be good enough to help you win a few more games but not good enough to lift you above mediocrity.
They don't have any other young pieces anyone in the league cares about. Covington is about the best they've got and I'd bet money other GMs see him as "guy putting up stats on horrible team."
And while they have huge cap space, so does essentially every other team in the league and all of them are much more appealing to free agents. Any decent free agent that Phiily goes after is going to be offered the same money from a team that hasn't been a dumpster fire for three years.
Does Philly have assets? Yes. Is future success possible? Yes. Has " The Process" been validated as better than any other rebuilding plan? Not even close. Philly could easily go through a half-decade of the worst basketball ever seen in the league and emerge with a team that never does more than make the Eastern Finals a time or two. Would that be a success?
Mike