Very true, I said this before already. This is the only league where depth is overrated. With the way the voters bring up injury history, you have to shore up your reserves. But then they go "oh too many bigs" or "there's only so much your depth can bring you". There's no way out of it, it's so funny.
The difference with your team, Yoki, is that you lack the top-tier talent that Orlando has (Kobe), and you have a lot more injury risks.
There is different types of depth.
What you want are clear starters and bench role players that have shown the ability to step up and play a bigger role in case of emergency. The team still has the center piece to build around.
vs.
Have a team deep with starters (not able to get all the minutes they should because of the depth) but no center piece that it is built around.
Having their minutes cut doesn't change the impact they bring to the game. Does their skills, instincts and basketball IQ diminish when they play lesser minutes? I don't think so.
There's no bad thing when it comes to deep bench. People would argue that you have to play the starers to bring heavy minutes, especially in the playoffs to maximize their production. That's true, and having great depth doesnt mean you have to sacrifice their minutes for the sake of making sure the guy behind him gets his minutes as well. You dont go "oh your playing magnificent but he needs his 30 minutes a game so you sit down". No, whoever is playing better gets the time, period.
The deep bench part comes in when injuries, foul trouble, sturggles on the court happen. Who wouldn't want a very skilled backup whatever to take away minutes from a starter who is suffering from one of those three factors?
And for the record, since they opened it up, this team has a top tier talent. His name is Damian Lillard. Gee, I don't know, didn't he took over a Portland team on his Rookie year? Isn't Portland ready to contemplate on trading LMA because they have a franchise player in their hands now?