Author Topic: Celtics News  (Read 2747858 times)

DefenseWinsChamps and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Celtics News
« Reply #2265 on: Today at 08:55:09 AM »

Offline boscel33

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2926
  • Tommy Points: 174
"There's sharks and minnows in this world. If you don't know which you are, you ain't a shark."

"Good night and good luck"

Re: Celtics News
« Reply #2266 on: Today at 04:50:47 PM »

Online Birdman

  • Danny Ainge
  • **********
  • Posts: 10459
  • Tommy Points: 467
I alway will have a special place in my heart for Horford, Holiday & Porzingis but look like it was a great thing in not keeping all 3? Porzingus still fighting that virus & hopefully he be okay while Jru & Al been hurt most of the year
C/PF-Horford, Baynes, Noel, Theis, Morris,
SF/SG- Tatum, Brown, Hayward, Smart, Semi, Clark
PG- Irving, Rozier, Larkin

Re: Celtics News
« Reply #2267 on: Today at 04:52:04 PM »

Online Who

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 53532
  • Tommy Points: 2582
https://x.com/CrumpledJumper/status/2003290505418080591/photo/1
Sooo... you're telling me that right now Neemy is a better rim protector (by 0.1!) than Ivaca Zubac that everyone thinks we should trade for and start ahead of Neemy?

I feel like people are underrating Q. Advanced metrics should always be taken with a grain of salt, but his are really impressive, particularly with a quarter of the season gone. Even more so when you consider how much he's getting paid.

Sometimes it's a snob thing, he was a nobody last season, he's getting paid peanuts, he's unspectacular, it's hard to change that paradigm of how we viewed him. I feel he impacts winning a lot more than people give him credit for. He's a perfect Moneyball type player to me.

Most of the names that people have brought up as supposed upgrades actually have worse advanced metrics than him, and cost ten times as much. Look at his percentiles for on-off. He's improved in pretty much every facet other than his free throw rate and his pts/possession and eFG. He's in the 90th %ile among all bigs in terms of his on-off differential, and his defensive metrics are all in the top 10-20% of bigs.



Queta only plays half the game. 25mpg. We need a 2nd starting caliber for the other half of the game.

It is not a question that Queta isn't solid. It is that we have 48 minutes at center and he is filling only half of them. Queta is not enough.
« Last Edit: Today at 05:09:14 PM by Who »

Re: Celtics News
« Reply #2268 on: Today at 06:37:17 PM »

Online Phantom255x

  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 37967
  • Tommy Points: 3433
  • On To Banner 19!
What we simply need is another big man, it could be someone better than Queta, or even just a viable backup behind him who can eat 20-25 minutes a night regularly. Because when Queta struggles, is in foul trouble or simply doesn't play due to injury that's when the issues arise. Because clearly Tillman/Boucher aren't trusted and are unplayable, and Garza I guess can have a few decent games here or there but that's not an ideal option still.
"Tough times never last, but tough people do." - Robert H. Schuller