Author Topic: Would you rather have Rondo or Sullinger back right now?  (Read 35595 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Would you rather have Rondo or Sullinger back right now?
« Reply #105 on: March 29, 2013, 11:00:57 AM »

Offline Fafnir

  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30863
  • Tommy Points: 1330
The question is would we have pushed the ball ahead via the pass with him?
Probably not, but given that we're not getting more fast break points, our pace is now only half a possession higher since his injury and the offense is crattering back to our mean for the season so far I don't think that's a big factor.

We blitzed a bunch of teams in transition at home right after Rondo went out, it seems to have proven to be a temporary surge. Probably a combination of other teams adjustments and our own play falling back.

Our half court offensive changes without Rondo are far more important than "passes ahead". But its not what Tommy talks about so....

Re: Would you rather have Rondo or Sullinger back right now?
« Reply #106 on: March 29, 2013, 11:08:45 AM »

Offline playdream

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1665
  • Tommy Points: 88


How does he make the new guys worse? ??? JET was the only one really struggling in January(Pierce too, but he is not new). He played better in Feb. Now in March, JET is struggling again and the team is not winning like they were in Feb and you can't blame that on Rondo because he is not here.
[/quote]
yeah it can't really be Rondo's fault since it's the team that has changed not him, but the situation is when he leaves the court the whole team suddenly have vital, even before his injury, and since Sully went down our team started to struggle

 

Re: Would you rather have Rondo or Sullinger back right now?
« Reply #107 on: March 29, 2013, 11:10:12 AM »

Offline Fafnir

  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30863
  • Tommy Points: 1330
since Sully went down our team started to struggle
Sully went down 1 game and 4 minutes after Rondo did.

Re: Would you rather have Rondo or Sullinger back right now?
« Reply #108 on: March 29, 2013, 11:14:15 AM »

Offline Prof. Clutch

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2199
  • Tommy Points: 237
  • Mind Games

Re: Would you rather have Rondo or Sullinger back right now?
« Reply #109 on: March 29, 2013, 11:16:31 AM »

Offline zimbo

  • Derrick White
  • Posts: 266
  • Tommy Points: 34


How does he make the new guys worse? ??? JET was the only one really struggling in January(Pierce too, but he is not new). He played better in Feb. Now in March, JET is struggling again and the team is not winning like they were in Feb and you can't blame that on Rondo because he is not here.
Quote from: playdream
yeah it can't really be Rondo's fault since it's the team that has changed not him, but the situation is when he leaves the court the whole team suddenly have vital, even before his injury, and since Sully went down our team started to struggle

What are you talking about. Do you know who Sully even is?

Like Fafnir mentioned, Sully went down 1 game after Rondo did. The team still won w/o him too. So according to the logic of some around here, Sully isn't necessary to the team either.

Re: Would you rather have Rondo or Sullinger back right now?
« Reply #110 on: March 29, 2013, 11:24:41 AM »

Offline pearljammer10

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13129
  • Tommy Points: 885
This shouldnt even be debatable.

Would you rather have your all star second best point guard in the league back on your team... Or an undersized rookie power forward that cant jump?

Like seriously? Its Rondo by a landslide. No contest.

Sully fills a need, yes. But Rondo is arguably the teams best all around player currently. How is this even a debate?

Re: Would you rather have Rondo or Sullinger back right now?
« Reply #111 on: March 29, 2013, 11:48:40 AM »

Offline Clench123

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3055
  • Tommy Points: 251
Rondo without a doubt.

Is this even a question?

I always said when I left the Celtics, I could not go to heaven, because that would
 be a step down. I am pure 100 percent Celtic. I think if you slashed my wrists, my
 blood would’ve been green.  -  Bill "Greatest of All Time" Russell

Re: Would you rather have Rondo or Sullinger back right now?
« Reply #112 on: March 29, 2013, 12:11:00 PM »

Offline Boris Badenov

  • Rajon Rondo
  • *****
  • Posts: 5227
  • Tommy Points: 1065
Rondo.  Sully can't win a playoff game (or playoff series) nearly on his own.  Rondo can.

I like Sully a lot, but at some point, talent trumps fit.

when did Rondo win a playoff game on his own?? Is as memorable as Green scoring 43 points a few weeks ago. Unless you win, its not memorable nor significant imo

There's the 2010 game 4 against Cleveland that sent LBJ out of town. His line was 29-18-13. Rondo dominated that game

When did he once dominate like this, this year?? I do remember an assist record he was pursuing, and also remember alot of pounding the ball making selective passes and gambling on defense. Losing streaks, slumps. He changed the way he played, with less intensity , laziness and cuteness


  Nobody dominates games like that every night. I think the issue is that no matter what ails the team (Terry's knee, PP's pinched nerve, Green needing to get back into shape, the new guys learning the system), you're either calling it "Rondo being lazy" or "Rondo pounding the ball". Rondo wasn't the reason our defense fell apart when KG went to the bench earlier this year. He isn't the reason that PP and Terry were shooting poorly and scoring less when they were less healthy. He's not the reason Green was shooting so poorly the first 2 months of the season. Laying the losing streaks and slumps on him is nonsense.

Not to mention that it is incredible that someone would criticize Rondo for the way he was pursuing the assist record without giving him any credit for almost breaking it. The only other PGs in league history with equal or longer streaks are Stockton and Magic, who are without question the two best pure point guards of the modern era.

And as far as that Cleveland game, it's the same nonsense. While Rondo may not have had 29-18-13 in any game this year, in the month of January alone he had the following lines:

14/11/10
17/10/12
30/2/7
17/13/8
23/10/11
16/10/11

For that 14-game period his high in points was 30, his high in assists was 15 and his high in rebounds was 13.

Sully never once touched that level of performance. The most "impressive" thing about Sully during that period is that he fouled out 6 times in 14 games, playing 23mpg.

But yeah, let's choose Sully instead of Rondo because Rondo wasn't getting 29/18/13 every night.

Re: Would you rather have Rondo or Sullinger back right now?
« Reply #113 on: March 29, 2013, 12:21:46 PM »

Offline CelticsFan9

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1571
  • Tommy Points: 116
  • Everyone's excited for the new era.
Far and away it's Rondo.

How many playoff games has Sully won us?  None.

How many playoff games has Rondo won us?  Probably five or six, all by himself.

Look, I love Sully, but to do anything substantial in the playoffs (beating Miami), we're going to need a star, and Rondo is that star.  We also need a guy that Miami doesn't really have an answer for, and that's Rondo, too.

Finally, Rondo is going to make everyone else around him better much more than Sully does.  Sully's rebounds are massive, but Rondo's ability to run an offense is much more valuable, especially in the playoffs.

This shouldn't even be a question.

Re: Would you rather have Rondo or Sullinger back right now?
« Reply #114 on: March 29, 2013, 12:28:31 PM »

Offline xmuscularghandix

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7620
  • Tommy Points: 280
Far and away it's Sullinger, he fits in with the rebounding issues and is an upgrade defensively and offensively. Celtics are playing well because they're sharing the ball. We don't need Rondo out there telling people that they aren't good enough to touch the ball until he decides they are.

Re: Would you rather have Rondo or Sullinger back right now?
« Reply #115 on: March 29, 2013, 12:41:35 PM »

Offline CelticsFan9

  • Don Chaney
  • *
  • Posts: 1571
  • Tommy Points: 116
  • Everyone's excited for the new era.
Far and away it's Sullinger, he fits in with the rebounding issues and is an upgrade defensively and offensively. Celtics are playing well because they're sharing the ball. We don't need Rondo out there telling people that they aren't good enough to touch the ball until he decides they are.

I'd love to hear an explanation of this statement.

Re: Would you rather have Rondo or Sullinger back right now?
« Reply #116 on: March 29, 2013, 12:50:03 PM »

Offline Tr1boy

  • Paul Pierce
  • ***************************
  • Posts: 27260
  • Tommy Points: 867
Rondo.  Sully can't win a playoff game (or playoff series) nearly on his own.  Rondo can.

I like Sully a lot, but at some point, talent trumps fit.

when did Rondo win a playoff game on his own?? Is as memorable as Green scoring 43 points a few weeks ago. Unless you win, its not memorable nor significant imo

There's the 2010 game 4 against Cleveland that sent LBJ out of town. His line was 29-18-13. Rondo dominated that game

When did he once dominate like this, this year?? I do remember an assist record he was pursuing, and also remember alot of pounding the ball making selective passes and gambling on defense. Losing streaks, slumps. He changed the way he played, with less intensity , laziness and cuteness


  Nobody dominates games like that every night. I think the issue is that no matter what ails the team (Terry's knee, PP's pinched nerve, Green needing to get back into shape, the new guys learning the system), you're either calling it "Rondo being lazy" or "Rondo pounding the ball". Rondo wasn't the reason our defense fell apart when KG went to the bench earlier this year. He isn't the reason that PP and Terry were shooting poorly and scoring less when they were less healthy. He's not the reason Green was shooting so poorly the first 2 months of the season. Laying the losing streaks and slumps on him is nonsense.

Again this ones easy. With Rondo earlier this year we stunk and without him starting with the Miami game until Barb went down, we were lethal. Everyone started to play better as a team.

Rondo did pound the ball , walked up with the ball and wanted guys to set picks for him and run around screens like headless monkeys for an easy bucket. In the end they had only like 5-7 seconds to shoot, which is pretty stressful

After they let rondo down, he started to get them to do the same thing but in reality gave the ball to Pierce and KG most of the time. 

Without Rondo, we were running up with the basketball, sharing the ball, spreading the energy and also had enough fast break points. Our defense was also great. This is celtics basketball


Re: Would you rather have Rondo or Sullinger back right now?
« Reply #117 on: March 29, 2013, 01:06:16 PM »

Offline Evantime34

  • NCE
  • Ed Macauley
  • ***********
  • Posts: 11942
  • Tommy Points: 764
  • Eagerly Awaiting the Next Fantasy Draft
The question is would we have pushed the ball ahead via the pass with him?
Probably not, but given that we're not getting more fast break points, our pace is now only half a possession higher since his injury and the offense is crattering back to our mean for the season so far I don't think that's a big factor.

We blitzed a bunch of teams in transition at home right after Rondo went out, it seems to have proven to be a temporary surge. Probably a combination of other teams adjustments and our own play falling back.

Our half court offensive changes without Rondo are far more important than "passes ahead". But its not what Tommy talks about so....
Ok I guess I more accurately should have said the entire offensive philosophy change rather than the early pass ahead. We are initiating offense with dribble hand offs instead of Rondo running a pick and roll.

Do you think Rondo would be able to adapt to this half court offense? Do you think it is more effective than our previous half court offense? To me in the half court since Rondo went down our best offense has been Green dribbling at the top of the key getting a head of steam then getting to the basket. Would Green has as many such opportunities with Rondo around?
DKC:  Rockets
CB Draft: Memphis Grizz
Players: Klay Thompson, Jabari Parker, Aaron Gordon
Next 3 picks: 4.14, 4.15, 4.19

Re: Would you rather have Rondo or Sullinger back right now?
« Reply #118 on: March 29, 2013, 01:31:02 PM »

Offline BballTim

  • Dave Cowens
  • ***********************
  • Posts: 23724
  • Tommy Points: 1123
Rondo.  Sully can't win a playoff game (or playoff series) nearly on his own.  Rondo can.

I like Sully a lot, but at some point, talent trumps fit.

when did Rondo win a playoff game on his own?? Is as memorable as Green scoring 43 points a few weeks ago. Unless you win, its not memorable nor significant imo

There's the 2010 game 4 against Cleveland that sent LBJ out of town. His line was 29-18-13. Rondo dominated that game

When did he once dominate like this, this year?? I do remember an assist record he was pursuing, and also remember alot of pounding the ball making selective passes and gambling on defense. Losing streaks, slumps. He changed the way he played, with less intensity , laziness and cuteness


  Nobody dominates games like that every night. I think the issue is that no matter what ails the team (Terry's knee, PP's pinched nerve, Green needing to get back into shape, the new guys learning the system), you're either calling it "Rondo being lazy" or "Rondo pounding the ball". Rondo wasn't the reason our defense fell apart when KG went to the bench earlier this year. He isn't the reason that PP and Terry were shooting poorly and scoring less when they were less healthy. He's not the reason Green was shooting so poorly the first 2 months of the season. Laying the losing streaks and slumps on him is nonsense.

Again this ones easy. With Rondo earlier this year we stunk and without him starting with the Miami game until Barb went down, we were lethal. Everyone started to play better as a team.

Rondo did pound the ball , walked up with the ball and wanted guys to set picks for him and run around screens like headless monkeys for an easy bucket. In the end they had only like 5-7 seconds to shoot, which is pretty stressful

After they let rondo down, he started to get them to do the same thing but in reality gave the ball to Pierce and KG most of the time. 

Without Rondo, we were running up with the basketball, sharing the ball, spreading the energy and also had enough fast break points. Our defense was also great. This is celtics basketball

  It's easy because you didn't address any of my points. You're also explaining why the offense has improved so much without Rondo when the biggest difference in the team is on defense, namely how well we play defense when KG is on the bench. Did you ever notice any of the things that I mentioned when you watched the Celts play? My guess, based on your response, is that you didn't.

Re: Would you rather have Rondo or Sullinger back right now?
« Reply #119 on: March 29, 2013, 01:37:45 PM »

Offline clover

  • Front Page Moderator
  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6130
  • Tommy Points: 315
I'd rather have Larry Bird back

Better that than Larry Bird's back.