So you didn't mean this?
This is the one downside/blindspot of the CB Draft IMO.... unchanging views of players with bad habits. Once people don't like a player he's tainted forever. Glad Red didn't think that way about guys like DJ or Parrish (and no i'm not comparing Nick Young to either HOF'er, calm down.... )
Yes I meant that.
I meant that
generally speaking in the CB Draft discussions, people's views (my own included) on players -- especially those with habits deemed "bad" -- seem to be slow to change... if at all.
(I think back to my friend Rob's zine
My Views Change Over Time... simple but powerful b/c we all don't acknowledge that enough.)
I also said/implied later that
specifically with Nick Young I thought that's what was happening. This also
by definition means that we disagree to some degree on the evaluation of Young.
What i
didn't say was that if we disagree it's always because the person i'm disagreeing with can't see the subtle changes in a players game....
Reasonable people can reasonably disagree about the pluses and minuses in a player's game. I hope it was not taken that I was trying to argue both sides of the coin and that this makes my thoughts a bit clearer.
TPs all around... Ubuntu.
PS. If other teams are doing scientific-projections factoring in pace (math that I probably can't even figure out any more

) the whole thing is moot... cuz our boat will be sunk!
