You have got to be kidding. Expecting silence for 60 seconds is just plain ridiculous. And waiting 60 seconds is unwarranted as well.
Yeah, having to stay quiet for 60 seconds to honor the memory of somebody who positively changed the lives of tens of millions of Americans is way out of proportion. What should we put the estimate on MLK's contribution as? 8, maybe 9 seconds? That would be more fitting. To be charitable, though, let's round it up to 10, since he was murdered while trying to improve the world. But definitely agreed, it's unwarranted to have any more than 10 seconds of silence for MLK.
I usually agree with you Roy, but i think the poster you quoted purposely left out MLK's name in his post to generalize moments of silence.
I doesnt matter if its MLK or some famous white guy. 60 is just a bit much, 20-30 seconds is fine, but asking 20,000 people to sit there for 60 seconds without doing or saying anything is kind of unrealistic. These people are all ridiculously pumped up and excited for a basketball game, some of them are drunk, some of them are most likely on something else... It's just a bit much
I dont think taking a 30 second moment of silence is any less respectful than a 60 second one.
It doesnt really accomplish anything anyways....
We have a national holiday for the man, kids all over this country are taught about what he did in school. I think we're doing a good job of respecting his legacy.