Funny thing about stories. The stories end the way the storyteller wants them to end whether it's the way the listener of the story wants it end or not.
I am sorry but a lot of you guys sound like wrestling marks complaining about how a predetermined, professional wrestling match didn't end the way they wanted.
Funny thing about stories -- how effective the ending is depends a great deal on how the storyteller gets there.
Is the ending earned or not? Does it fit with what came before it? Do the narrative threads and themes developed early in the story come to a satisfying, comprehensible, and organic conclusion?
All that is subjective. What I am saying is, the storyteller tells the story and it ends the way the storyteller tells it. And people act based on that.
What I see happening is that people who love the series for the series, love the storytelling. Most people I know, loved last season and the payoff of who Jon Snow really was. Yet many of the "informed" fans have done nothing but pan on it.
Most people I know aren't GoT fans that are going through the internet to fan sites, discussing it on Reddit, and trying to go through every portion of it making sure every single last detail and prophecy is fulfilled in a satisfying manner. Those people, I am sorry, are in the mass minority. They are probably a very, very small amount of the 12 million people who watch every week.
I had a ton of family and friends comment about the darkness of the episode but other than that really loved the rollercoaster emotional ride that last episode was. I know the people I was watching it with started cheering when Arya finally killed the Night King. There wasn't the consternation that I see pouring forth from the "informed" fans I have seen on the internet.
People can choose to engage with popular culture at whatever level they prefer. I agree with that.
Those people you know who really enjoyed the episode, who cheered when Arya killed NK -- they're not
wrong. I'm not saying they shouldn't have enjoyed the episode.
That doesn't mean I have to agree that GoT has done a good job telling this last stretch of the story.
People enjoy cheesy, poorly written stuff all the time, just like people enjoy cheesy, processed food all the time. I'm not above doing so, either.
What you're saying reminds me of when people respond to criticism of any piece of sci/fi or fantasy by saying "Who cares if it makes sense, it's all made up anyway."
That's fine if you, or anybody else, feels that way. But all it says to me is that you don't really take the genre seriously, you just think it's fun. Fluff. Which is your prerogative, but it's not how the show itself styles itself.
GoT is a show that has garnered its popularity based on presenting itself as a serious, prestige drama, albeit one set in a medieval fantasy world. GoT clearly wants to be regarded as a show that is serious about creating its world, developing its cast of characters, and telling its story. They're not just trying to make a spectacle that people will enjoy in the moment. They want to make something with depth that will stand the test of time and reside in the pantheon of all time great television shows.
I think it's fair to engage with the show on its own terms, i.e. to take it seriously enough to be critical of how the whole is constructed.