Simple answer:
He's better than most back up power forwards and he's already under contract.
I don't think this is true. Big Baby is far more versatile than most back-up forwards (he can do a little bit of everything), but he's pretty mediocre over all. Outside of not being horrible on D and hitting the offensive boards, I can't think of anything Baby does better than most back-up 4s.
i wouldn't say mediocre. I would say he's average, except for getting his shot blocked. As much as those baby backers want to play that off, having your shot blocked isn't a good thing.
i took a quick look around the league and here are some backup PFs who are better than or will probably be equally as good as BBD (in our system) that aren't in our team:
Troy Murphy
Mareese Speights
Taj Gibson
JJ Hickson (assuming Jamison starts)
Jason Maxiell
Chris Wilcox
Luc Mbah Moute
Udonis Haslem
Brandon Bass
Al Harrington
Lamar Odom
Louis Amundson
Carl Landry
Shawn Marion
Chuck Hayes
DeJuan Blair
Antonio McDyess
as for backup Centers:
Chris Andersen
Marcus Camby
Joel Pryzbilla
Mehmet Okur (if Big Al starts)
Al Jefferson (if Okur starts)
Brendan Haywood
Marcin Gortat
i'm on the bubble with Dampier and big Z and Beasley
BBD is a solid enough role player. he's not horrible, but as you can see, there are a significant number of other backups better than or his equal.
- LilRip
Troy Murphy- Murphy has been a starter most of his career and will probably start in Jersey.
Mareese Speights- Baby is better than
Taj Gibson- Baby is better than
JJ Hickson (assuming Jamison starts)- Baby is better than
Jason Maxiell- Baby is better than
Chris Wilcox- Should only be a 4th big on an ok team
Luc Mbah Moute- is more of a 3/4, but if you want to have him, I'd still take Baby's strength and size of over the Prince
Udonis Haslem- Better than Baby
Brandon Bass- I'd take Baby's versatility offensively as well as his motor over Bass anyday.
Al Harrington- Has been a starter a large part of his career. Is also a malcontent and a ball hog. Give me Baby.
Lamar Odom- I would take him over baby.
Louis Amundson- Has had one very good season, but I'm not willing to claim he's better than baby.
Carl Landry- Isn't Landry starting now? If he isn't he's a better bench big.
Shawn Marion- Shawn is a better 3/4. But against 4s I'd say Baby is better at this point.
Chuck Hayes- Baby
DeJuan Blair- Can rebound like a mother, but I don't know if he can do anything else. Give me baby for now.
Antonio McDyess- That's just silly.
So out of your list I have picked 3 maybe 4 who are out and out better than Baby. Also, to the discussion about Baby's blocked shots, I would love to see a stat about how many times Baby had a blocked shot after he pulled an offensive rebound away from two bigger guys. It puts him in a weird double team he can't pass out of and has to force a shot. But honestly, I'm ok with it because it makes the opposing bigs work harder and puts them at risk for a foul. AT that point he's playing with house money.
I disagree with a lot of your comparisons.
-Speights: Overall slightly better now, definitely better in the future
-Gibson: better overall, i'd take davis now if i needed someone to play the 5 off the bench. we don't.
-Hickson: Significantly better now and down the road
-Maxiell: Better. Similar D, Maxiell better on O by a margin.
-Wilcox: I kind of like him for a limited role, but I take Davis for sure.
-Mbah a Moute: Better. More valuable, especially for our team.
-Haslem: Better.
-Bass: Significantly Better, as long as no heavy minutes at the 5.
-Harrington: better overall. Maybe not for this team though, but he probably would be.
-Odom: way better.
-Amundson: Can't say. In a vacuum I take Davis because he's done more and is more proven. But there's a good chance he's better because of superior finishing skill, defense and rebounding. I really would like the scenario of trading Davis for a true bench 3 and signing amundson with the min.
-Landry or Jason Thompson: Better than Davis by a margin
-Marion: Better, but on his way down and going to be more overpaid soon.
-Chuck Hayes: Better than Davis; he's one of the best big man defenders there is. Elite level.
-Blair: as long as his knees are okay, he's better than Davis.
-McDyess: at this point i'll take Davis.
Other Bench guys I'll take (either better than Davis outright or better for our team):
-Diaw or Ty Thomas
-Maybe Amir Johnson
-Craig Smith
-Maybe Hakim Warrick
-Maybe Jordan Hill (particularly down the road
-Matt Bonner
-Serge Ibaka
-Chris Andersen
-Probably Turiaf (defense)
-Josh McRoberts, Dante Cunningham, and Tyler Hansbrough all fall in the category of close to Davis such that I'd take any of the three back in a trade if such a trade also netted a useful bench 3 (i.e. McRoberts/Hansbrough plus Rush or Dahntay Jones from Indiana or Cunningham and Rudy from Portland).
Anyway, what this whole thing of "Why Is Glen Davis still on this team?" boils down to is not that anyone (that I know of) wants Davis off the team for no reason, but rather that he is expendable and perhaps enticing to other teams; the only player (except perhaps Robinson, Perk, or Bradley) who could perhaps make our team better if traded for a certain package. Namely, I think a lot of people here are pointing out that in 10-20 mpg at the 4 spot, we could replace Davis with many other players and not lose much (if anything) while making the team better overall if Davis were moved for a useful 3; any of the players above plus a useful small forward would improve the C's.