0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.
Horrible pick in my opinion. Hope he was drafted for trade reasons at some point. Too small to guard most two guards in the league reagrdless of how everyone is going on about his defensive game. Cannot get to the rim and get himself to the line and when he does he is a horrible free throw shooter. The Celtics needed a very good perimeter shooter or a big man and the best perimeter shooter available was James Anderson who also could take it to the rack. He was the best player in what most people thought was the best conference in the country and the same one Bradley played in. No comparison in their offensive games. For you people complaining Anderson played no defense that's what we have Tony Allen for at that spot and his defense was not nearly as bad as you so called experts are making it out to be. The Spurs will be laughibg along time over this one!! Horrible Pick!!
I'm just confused why Tony Allen, at 6-4, is plenty tall enough to be a shooting guard and, at times, even a small forward. However, the 6-3 Bradley, with a large wingspan, is apparently way too small to play the 2-spot, even for 10 mpg.
Quote from: Jon on June 25, 2010, 03:32:10 PMI'm just confused why Tony Allen, at 6-4, is plenty tall enough to be a shooting guard and, at times, even a small forward. However, the 6-3 Bradley, with a large wingspan, is apparently way too small to play the 2-spot, even for 10 mpg. Well he looks pretty wiry. Tony is a bulldog.
Quote from: Greenbean on June 25, 2010, 03:36:26 PMQuote from: Jon on June 25, 2010, 03:32:10 PMI'm just confused why Tony Allen, at 6-4, is plenty tall enough to be a shooting guard and, at times, even a small forward. However, the 6-3 Bradley, with a large wingspan, is apparently way too small to play the 2-spot, even for 10 mpg. Well he looks pretty wiry. Tony is a bulldog.Perhaps, but that's more useful at the 3. Iff you asked the two of them to face each other and stick their arms up, Bradley may have the longer reach. That should be fine for what ultimately will only amount to, at best, 5-10 mpg at the 2-spot.
Quote from: Jon on June 25, 2010, 03:38:39 PMQuote from: Greenbean on June 25, 2010, 03:36:26 PMQuote from: Jon on June 25, 2010, 03:32:10 PMI'm just confused why Tony Allen, at 6-4, is plenty tall enough to be a shooting guard and, at times, even a small forward. However, the 6-3 Bradley, with a large wingspan, is apparently way too small to play the 2-spot, even for 10 mpg. Well he looks pretty wiry. Tony is a bulldog.Perhaps, but that's more useful at the 3. Iff you asked the two of them to face each other and stick their arms up, Bradley may have the longer reach. That should be fine for what ultimately will only amount to, at best, 5-10 mpg at the 2-spot. I probably should have been more clear. I agree with you. We saw Rondo guard Kobe with effectiveness for stretches in the Finals. If you are athletic enough, you do not need to have the body.I was just saying weight and body type may be the reason people are saying he cant be a 2 guard.
After reading more articles about Bradley and listening to his interview, I feel more and more encouraged and excited about him. Too bad he won't be able to play in the summer league but I hope we really have drafted a special kid (and to think he is actually one year younger than me ) and hopefully he will contribute this season but especially develops into a good to great player in the future.
Quote from: Jon on June 25, 2010, 03:32:10 PMI'm just confused why Tony Allen, at 6-4, is plenty tall enough to be a shooting guard and, at times, even a small forward. However, the 6-3 Bradley, with a large wingspan, is apparently way too small to play the 2-spot, even for 10 mpg. Tony Allen is a legitimate 6-4. Bradley is really only 6-2. He's only 6-3 "in shoes." TA is a lot stronger. When you're going up against Joe Johnson, Kobe Bryant, Tyreke Evans, etc, those two inches and 15lbs of muscle make a huge difference.