0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.
its not like we really even use of draft picks anyway....i mean giddens was a low first rounder and he hasn't done anything.
Quote from: PLamb on February 16, 2010, 09:58:36 PMGod I hope this isn't trueCan't stand the playerCan't stand his gameCan't stand his egoCan't stand his attitudeCan't stand the thought of him on this teamTP Mate. Unimpressed and Underwhelmed by DA atm.
God I hope this isn't trueCan't stand the playerCan't stand his gameCan't stand his egoCan't stand his attitudeCan't stand the thought of him on this team
Quote from: Chris on February 17, 2010, 12:48:25 PMQuote from: slamdunk on February 17, 2010, 12:44:30 PMI don't see what the big deal is about giving up a 1st round pick. Is losing out on the next JR Giddens such a big deal? Especially when the team would have to give him a guaranteed contract when their payroll is high already.Because it can't be used in a bigger trade, that helps the team more.And it could be the next JR Giddens, or it could be the next Glen Davis, Carlos Boozer, Michael Redd, Gilbert Arenas, Rajon Rondo, etc. Especially since the way the C's are playing right now, the pick could climb significantly higher than it was when they got Giddens.Just because the last first round pick for the C's was a bust does not mean every late first round pick is a bustWell, maybe. On the other hand, the vast majority of late first round draft picks don't end up panning out. Could it be another Boozer, Redd or Gilbert? Sure. But the chances of it being another JR is vastly greater. This is a trade that pretty clearly upgrades and addresses a weakness. Giving up a late first seems non-consequential to me.
Quote from: slamdunk on February 17, 2010, 12:44:30 PMI don't see what the big deal is about giving up a 1st round pick. Is losing out on the next JR Giddens such a big deal? Especially when the team would have to give him a guaranteed contract when their payroll is high already.Because it can't be used in a bigger trade, that helps the team more.And it could be the next JR Giddens, or it could be the next Glen Davis, Carlos Boozer, Michael Redd, Gilbert Arenas, Rajon Rondo, etc. Especially since the way the C's are playing right now, the pick could climb significantly higher than it was when they got Giddens.Just because the last first round pick for the C's was a bust does not mean every late first round pick is a bust
I don't see what the big deal is about giving up a 1st round pick. Is losing out on the next JR Giddens such a big deal? Especially when the team would have to give him a guaranteed contract when their payroll is high already.
Celtics fans are going to LOVE Nate Robinson. He's like Marcus Banks if he was 7 inches shorter and could dunk.
i just wish we could get rid of some of our useless guys for a piece that could contribute...walker, giddens, scal and sheldon do nothing
Quote from: celticinorlando on February 17, 2010, 01:48:54 PMi just wish we could get rid of some of our useless guys for a piece that could contribute...walker, giddens, scal and sheldon do nothing They are worth the playing time they get sadly. I like your band aid on bullet hole analogy.
Quote from: soap07 on February 17, 2010, 01:26:25 PMQuote from: Chris on February 17, 2010, 12:48:25 PMQuote from: slamdunk on February 17, 2010, 12:44:30 PMI don't see what the big deal is about giving up a 1st round pick. Is losing out on the next JR Giddens such a big deal? Especially when the team would have to give him a guaranteed contract when their payroll is high already.Because it can't be used in a bigger trade, that helps the team more.And it could be the next JR Giddens, or it could be the next Glen Davis, Carlos Boozer, Michael Redd, Gilbert Arenas, Rajon Rondo, etc. Especially since the way the C's are playing right now, the pick could climb significantly higher than it was when they got Giddens.Just because the last first round pick for the C's was a bust does not mean every late first round pick is a bustWell, maybe. On the other hand, the vast majority of late first round draft picks don't end up panning out. Could it be another Boozer, Redd or Gilbert? Sure. But the chances of it being another JR is vastly greater. This is a trade that pretty clearly upgrades and addresses a weakness. Giving up a late first seems non-consequential to me. I guess the problem is that I don't think the upgrade is that clear. It has the potential for that, but nothing is a given when you are talking about bench players like this.