Author Topic: Nate to Celtics Official / Danny's take (merged Nate threads)  (Read 119079 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Nate Robinson to BOS?
« Reply #45 on: February 17, 2010, 04:29:21 AM »

Offline PosImpos

  • NCE
  • Frank Ramsey
  • ************
  • Posts: 12383
  • Tommy Points: 903
  • Rondo = Good
How does this trade make sense for us in the long run. I mean, Nate is definitely a player we would want to have on our team, but the catch is we can't re-sign him next year without using the MLE. Is this correct, Roy Hobbs?

I'm not Hobbs but I'm fairly certain that's true.

Trading him means his bird rights are lost, meaning we couldn't sign him to anything more than a vet. minimum contract without using at least part of the MLE (we already used the LLE on Daniels for this season).

It's almost certain we wouldn't retain his services after this season.
Never forget the Champs of '08, or the gutsy warriors of '10.

"I know you all wanna win, but you gotta do it TOGETHER!"
- Doc Rivers

Re: Nate Robinson to BOS?
« Reply #46 on: February 17, 2010, 04:59:39 AM »

Offline Tough Juice

  • Brad Stevens
  • Posts: 230
  • Tommy Points: 17
From Twitter

Last Intel I Had On Details of Possible Celts/Knicks Deal - Eddie House, Shelden Williams & Future Draft Pick for Marcus Landry & N Robinson

Source: Nate Robinson Has Been Told 2 Not Join His Team & Wait for Word On Finalization of Pending Trade, Nate's Waiting 2 Approve LA or Bos

PS. last night Nate was off court, maybe it's a done deal

Re: Nate Robinson to BOS?
« Reply #47 on: February 17, 2010, 05:12:20 AM »

Offline xmuscularghandix

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7620
  • Tommy Points: 280
How does this trade make sense for us in the long run. I mean, Nate is definitely a player we would want to have on our team, but the catch is we can't re-sign him next year without using the MLE. Is this correct, Roy Hobbs?

I'm not Hobbs but I'm fairly certain that's true.

Trading him means his bird rights are lost, meaning we couldn't sign him to anything more than a vet. minimum contract without using at least part of the MLE (we already used the LLE on Daniels for this season).

It's almost certain we wouldn't retain his services after this season.

Bird rights come along in a trade.

Quote from: NBA salary cap FAQ
LARRY BIRD EXCEPTION -- This is the best known one. Players who qualify for this exception are called "Qualifying Veteran Free Agents" in the CBA, and this exception is a component of the Veteran Free Agent exception. This exception allows teams to exceed the salary cap to re-sign their own free agents, up to the player's maximum salary. The player essentially must play for three seasons without being waived or changing teams as a free agent. This means a player can obtain "Bird rights" by playing under three one-year contracts, a single contract of at least three years, or any combination. It also means that when a player is traded, his Bird rights are traded with him, and his new team can use the Bird exception to re-sign him. These contracts can be up to six years in length. A player can receive raises up to 10.5% of the salary in the first season of the contract. This exception is known as the Larry Bird exception because the Celtics were the first team allowed to exceed the cap to keep their own free agent, and the player happened to be Bird.

Note: There are some subtleties to the three-year tenure requirement.

There is one more limit to the maximum salary that can be given using the Larry Bird exception. If the player was a first round draft pick and just completed the third year of his rookie scale contract, but his team did not exercise its option to extend the contract for the fourth season, then this exception cannot be used to give him a salary greater than he would have received had the team exercised their fourth year option. In other words, teams can't decline the option in order to get around the salary scale and give the player more money.

Starting January 10 of each season, this exception begins to reduce in value.

Re: Nate Robinson to BOS?
« Reply #48 on: February 17, 2010, 05:16:04 AM »

Offline Greeny

  • Derrick White
  • Posts: 282
  • Tommy Points: 23
  • LETS DO IT AGAIN!
Nate can drive to the hoop and rebound.
He can score and play some D, atleast better the Eddie.
As much as I love Eddie, I can see more and more how his game is one dimensional. I got sick when Jason Williams went the distance in 4 seconds and Eddie hammered him in the head.

Gotta keep TA as much as it hurts to say it.
TA has got it going lately, and would run with Nate.
Maybe Westcoast offense if you put in Rondo, TA, Nate, KG and Sheed.

Re: Nate Robinson to BOS?
« Reply #49 on: February 17, 2010, 05:18:19 AM »

Offline xmuscularghandix

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7620
  • Tommy Points: 280
Nate can drive to the hoop and rebound.
He can score and play some D, atleast better the Eddie.
As much as I love Eddie, I can see more and more how his game is one dimensional. I got sick when Jason Williams went the distance in 4 seconds and Eddie hammered him in the head.

Gotta keep TA as much as it hurts to say it.
TA has got it going lately, and would run with Nate.
Maybe Westcoast offense if you put in Rondo, TA, Nate, KG and Sheed.

WESTSIIIIDE!!!

Re: Nate Robinson to BOS?
« Reply #50 on: February 17, 2010, 05:38:41 AM »

Offline P2

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2088
  • Tommy Points: 163
  • Green 18!
Nate can drive to the hoop and rebound.
He can score and play some D, atleast better the Eddie.
As much as I love Eddie, I can see more and more how his game is one dimensional. I got sick when Jason Williams went the distance in 4 seconds and Eddie hammered him in the head.

Gotta keep TA as much as it hurts to say it.
TA has got it going lately, and would run with Nate.
Maybe Westcoast offense if you put in Rondo, TA, Nate, KG and Sheed.

WESTSIIIIDE!!!

Geah! TP!

Re: Nate Robinson to BOS?
« Reply #51 on: February 17, 2010, 06:56:13 AM »

Offline Bankshot

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7540
  • Tommy Points: 632
Can't we just trade Giddens/Walker and Shelden?  I hate to see Eddie go. :'(

Could Eddie get bought out and return?  We could use him in special situations.
"If somebody would have told you when he was playing with the Knicks that Nate Robinson was going to change a big time game and he was going to do it mostly because of his defense, somebody would have got slapped."  Mark Jackson

Re: Nate Robinson to BOS?
« Reply #52 on: February 17, 2010, 07:00:51 AM »

Online boscel33

  • Jim Loscutoff
  • **
  • Posts: 2853
  • Tommy Points: 173
i just read that we may have to include a 1st round pick in this deal.  i'll pass, thanks!
"There's sharks and minnows in this world. If you don't know which you are, you ain't a shark."

Re: Nate Robinson to BOS?
« Reply #53 on: February 17, 2010, 07:16:16 AM »

Offline P2

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2088
  • Tommy Points: 163
  • Green 18!
i just read that we may have to include a 1st round pick in this deal.  i'll pass, thanks!

Yep.

Re: Nate Robinson to BOS?
« Reply #54 on: February 17, 2010, 07:49:42 AM »

Offline CoachBo

  • NCE
  • Paul Silas
  • ******
  • Posts: 6069
  • Tommy Points: 336
A pick?

This deal stinks on its face.

But to add a pick is insane. Better to do absolutely nothing than this.
Coined the CelticsBlog term, "Euromistake."

Re: Nate Robinson to BOS?
« Reply #55 on: February 17, 2010, 07:55:36 AM »

Offline Bankshot

  • Tiny Archibald
  • *******
  • Posts: 7540
  • Tommy Points: 632
What if we gave them a second rounder?  And if we have to give a pick, I don't think they should get Eddie.
"If somebody would have told you when he was playing with the Knicks that Nate Robinson was going to change a big time game and he was going to do it mostly because of his defense, somebody would have got slapped."  Mark Jackson

Re: Nate Robinson to BOS?
« Reply #56 on: February 17, 2010, 08:06:16 AM »

Offline celticinorlando

  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32883
  • Tommy Points: 843
  • Larry Bird for President
eddie has to be in the deal. no sense to keep both little guys

Re: Nate Robinson to BOS?
« Reply #57 on: February 17, 2010, 08:22:56 AM »

Offline Andy Jick

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3795
  • Tommy Points: 89
  • You know my methods, Watson.
IF (major "if") a 1st round pick has to be added then i'd pass...

at one point the knicks were going to just cut this guy (if the rumors were true) so there's now way i'd add a draft pick for him. 

personally, i'd just sit back and watch the waiver wire and buyouts following the trade deadline...  nate is a nice player, but for the limited amount of time he'll get on the court i'd just as soon stick with eddie house and roll the dice.
"It was easier to know it than to explain why I know it."

Re: Nate Robinson to BOS?
« Reply #58 on: February 17, 2010, 08:31:29 AM »

Offline WeMadeIt17

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3397
  • Tommy Points: 435
Yeah i just was reading on Realgm that the deal is close to being done.

Re: Nate Robinson to BOS?
« Reply #59 on: February 17, 2010, 08:32:30 AM »

Offline celticinorlando

  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32883
  • Tommy Points: 843
  • Larry Bird for President
still interested to see what happens with ray