Poll

What will Tebow be the NFL equivalent of?

0 - Jason White or Tommie Frasier. Your grandkid will say "Tim who?"
1 (1.6%)
1 - Eric Crouch. Not an NFL QB. Not an NFL player. Barely a CFL QB
6 (9.8%)
2 -  Tee Martin or Adrian McPherson or something. Drafted as a backup, but still doesn't make it
2 (3.3%)
3 - Todd Collins or maybe Danny Weurfeulish Career backup
1 (1.6%)
4 - Chris Simms or Rex Grossman or something. Will tease and make some starts, and show some potential but that's about it.
5 (8.2%)
5 - Brady Quinn. Not your biggest problem on the team, but not really a solution either. Nobody knows what to do with him.
2 (3.3%)
6 - Trent Ewardsish. - Will play and give you a chance to win, but that's about it.
3 (4.9%)
7 - Trent Dilfer or possibly Chad Pennington. - Will do some winning at times. May get to one Pro Bowl, but not one of the best of his era
8 (13.1%)
8 - Matt Ryan/Joe Flacco or Matt Hasselbeck/Aaron Rogersish or something. Good from day 1 or waits his turn and does well. Good enough to do winning and give hope for big things.
4 (6.6%)
9 - Drew Brees or Phillip Rivers. A very good QB in his era.
2 (3.3%)
10 - Manning, Brady, Montanaish
3 (4.9%)
Not Applicable. - Michael Robinson, Julian Edelmen, Brad Smithish
5 (8.2%)
Not in these categories. More like John Beck or Patrick Ramsey. Just a wasted high pick most likely.
1 (1.6%)
Collosal Bust ala Cade McNown, Tim Couch, Ryan Leaf cause someone will draft him very high
3 (4.9%)
Doug Flutie. Break the rules. Change the game
15 (24.6%)

Total Members Voted: 61

Author Topic: What will Tebow be the NFL equivalent of?  (Read 103613 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: What will Tebow be the NFL equivalent of?
« Reply #90 on: November 07, 2011, 08:44:59 AM »

Offline Eja117

  • NCE
  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19274
  • Tommy Points: 1254
The Broncos won yesterday, and Tebow was a big part of it.  That's the most important thing.  That said, he had another poor throwing day.  I don't think an NFL QB can be a consistent winner without being able to throw at an average level.
True. Brett Farve wasn't a consistent winner

Re: What will Tebow be the NFL equivalent of?
« Reply #91 on: November 07, 2011, 08:54:42 AM »

Offline indeedproceed

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 42585
  • Tommy Points: 2756
  • You ain't the boss of the freakin' bedclothes.
The Broncos won yesterday, and Tebow was a big part of it.  That's the most important thing.  That said, he had another poor throwing day.  I don't think an NFL QB can be a consistent winner without being able to throw at an average level.
True. Brett Farve wasn't a consistent winner

Brett Farve had an arm like some kind of supernatural being. Tim Tebow, while obviously the second coming of the son of god, basically throws like your average D1 QB.

"You've gotta respect a 15-percent 3-point shooter. A guy
like that is always lethal." - Evan 'The God' Turner

Re: What will Tebow be the NFL equivalent of?
« Reply #92 on: November 07, 2011, 09:09:14 AM »

Offline Eja117

  • NCE
  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19274
  • Tommy Points: 1254
The Broncos won yesterday, and Tebow was a big part of it.  That's the most important thing.  That said, he had another poor throwing day.  I don't think an NFL QB can be a consistent winner without being able to throw at an average level.
True. Brett Farve wasn't a consistent winner

Brett Farve had an arm like some kind of supernatural being. Tim Tebow, while obviously the second coming of the son of god, basically throws like your average D1 QB.
Oh Brett totally had a blessed arm, which he used to throw interceptions at the absolute worst time routinely.

I understand that for some people when they think "Tebow" the next thing that pops in their head legitimately is "can't throw", but for Farve the first thing I think is "interception choke artist" and that's legit too. 

The interesting thing is I think both players can be argued benefit from a double standard (and unfair hating).  Brett was just loved. Just loved for like no reason. 

Tebow has a lot of people that love him for non football reasons. 

I mean you say he's like the 2nd Jesus and I actually kind of agree. Imagine if Jesus actually came back and was actually a QB.  There are so many people that would just be like "Doesn't matter how he plays. You have to have that guy on your team and look how he just wins".  And there'd be others like "But he has no idea what he's doing."   It is almost exactly like that. It's one of the weirdest sports things I've ever seen.

Re: What will Tebow be the NFL equivalent of?
« Reply #93 on: November 07, 2011, 10:32:01 AM »

Offline MBunge

  • Antoine Walker
  • ****
  • Posts: 4661
  • Tommy Points: 471
Where do I vote for Tim Tebow and the NFL Antoine Walker, just without the wiggle?  I mean, if I described a player as being a great competitor with unusual talent but tremendous flaws in how he played the game, am I talking about Tebow or 'Toine?

Mike

Re: What will Tebow be the NFL equivalent of?
« Reply #94 on: November 07, 2011, 10:35:38 AM »

Offline indeedproceed

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 42585
  • Tommy Points: 2756
  • You ain't the boss of the freakin' bedclothes.
Where do I vote for Tim Tebow and the NFL Antoine Walker, just without the wiggle?  I mean, if I described a player as being a great competitor with unusual talent but tremendous flaws in how he played the game, am I talking about Tebow or 'Toine?

Mike

Tim Tebow will never struggle with the conditioning and diva/effort issues that plagued Walker.

"You've gotta respect a 15-percent 3-point shooter. A guy
like that is always lethal." - Evan 'The God' Turner

Re: What will Tebow be the NFL equivalent of?
« Reply #95 on: November 07, 2011, 10:37:15 AM »

Offline wdleehi

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34114
  • Tommy Points: 1612
  • Basketball is Newtonian Physics
Still not a starting QB in the NFL.


Team won because of the rushing game (he was a part of that) and the defense picking off three passes.  (a punt return for a TD also helps)


Tebow is a football player.  He might be an NFL level football player, but not at QB.  


And since you wanted to compare him to Newton

Besides Newtons rushing yards and TD, he has been a good passer for a rookie.

2393 yards.  11 tds and 9 ints.  60.6% completion rate.  87.1 QB rating.


Tebow for his career (6 starts)

1190 yards, 11 TDs and 4 ints.  48% completions rate.  81 QB rating.  

That completion percentage is well below average for an NFL QB.  

Re: What will Tebow be the NFL equivalent of?
« Reply #96 on: November 07, 2011, 10:39:20 AM »

Offline wdleehi

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 34114
  • Tommy Points: 1612
  • Basketball is Newtonian Physics
Where do I vote for Tim Tebow and the NFL Antoine Walker, just without the wiggle?  I mean, if I described a player as being a great competitor with unusual talent but tremendous flaws in how he played the game, am I talking about Tebow or 'Toine?

Mike


Walker was a very good NBA player.  When he was young and healthy, he could play two positions very well (SF and PF). 

He just fell in love with the outside shot and ended up with a head coach that gave him the green light. 

Re: What will Tebow be the NFL equivalent of?
« Reply #97 on: November 07, 2011, 11:04:58 AM »

Offline Eja117

  • NCE
  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19274
  • Tommy Points: 1254
Still not a starting QB in the NFL.


Team won because of the rushing game (he was a part of that) and the defense picking off three passes.  (a punt return for a TD also helps)


Tebow is a football player.  He might be an NFL level football player, but not at QB.  


And since you wanted to compare him to Newton

Besides Newtons rushing yards and TD, he has been a good passer for a rookie.

2393 yards.  11 tds and 9 ints.  60.6% completion rate.  87.1 QB rating.


Tebow for his career (6 starts)

1190 yards, 11 TDs and 4 ints.  48% completions rate.  81 QB rating.  

That completion percentage is well below average for an NFL QB.  
But the more important stat is wins and losses and Cam is 2-6.  I like Cam. I like Tebow too.

Re: What will Tebow be the NFL equivalent of?
« Reply #98 on: November 07, 2011, 11:21:45 AM »

Offline Fafnir

  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30863
  • Tommy Points: 1330
Still not a starting QB in the NFL.


Team won because of the rushing game (he was a part of that) and the defense picking off three passes.  (a punt return for a TD also helps)


Tebow is a football player.  He might be an NFL level football player, but not at QB.  


And since you wanted to compare him to Newton

Besides Newtons rushing yards and TD, he has been a good passer for a rookie.

2393 yards.  11 tds and 9 ints.  60.6% completion rate.  87.1 QB rating.


Tebow for his career (6 starts)

1190 yards, 11 TDs and 4 ints.  48% completions rate.  81 QB rating.  

That completion percentage is well below average for an NFL QB.  
But the more important stat is wins and losses and Cam is 2-6.  I like Cam. I like Tebow too.
When you're projected a young player's individual future potential wins and losses matter very little.

If Denver's defense doesn't recover a fumble in OT against the Dolphins (whereupon Tebow went 3 yards in 3 downs) and instead they go down the filed and their kicker kicks a FG does that change your evaluation of Tebow because its a "loss" instead of a win?

Re: What will Tebow be the NFL equivalent of?
« Reply #99 on: November 07, 2011, 11:26:50 AM »

Online Donoghus

  • Global Moderator
  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32687
  • Tommy Points: 1732
  • What a Pub Should Be
Hat's off to Tebow for grabbing the "W".

Still not sold on the kid at all but good win for the Broncos.


2010 CB Historical Draft - Best Overall Team

Re: What will Tebow be the NFL equivalent of?
« Reply #100 on: November 07, 2011, 11:29:26 AM »

Offline Eja117

  • NCE
  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19274
  • Tommy Points: 1254
Still not a starting QB in the NFL.


Team won because of the rushing game (he was a part of that) and the defense picking off three passes.  (a punt return for a TD also helps)


Tebow is a football player.  He might be an NFL level football player, but not at QB.  


And since you wanted to compare him to Newton

Besides Newtons rushing yards and TD, he has been a good passer for a rookie.

2393 yards.  11 tds and 9 ints.  60.6% completion rate.  87.1 QB rating.


Tebow for his career (6 starts)

1190 yards, 11 TDs and 4 ints.  48% completions rate.  81 QB rating.  

That completion percentage is well below average for an NFL QB.  
But the more important stat is wins and losses and Cam is 2-6.  I like Cam. I like Tebow too.
When you're projected a young player's individual future potential wins and losses matter very little.

If Denver's defense doesn't recover a fumble in OT against the Dolphins (whereupon Tebow went 3 yards in 3 downs) and instead they go down the filed and their kicker kicks a FG does that change your evaluation of Tebow because its a "loss" instead of a win?
All true. I would say yes, because I'm superstitious

Re: What will Tebow be the NFL equivalent of?
« Reply #101 on: November 07, 2011, 11:31:33 AM »

Offline MBz

  • Bailey Howell
  • **
  • Posts: 2203
  • Tommy Points: 30
Hat's off to Tebow for grabbing the "W".

Still not sold on the kid at all but good win for the Broncos.

Right.  I am still not impressed.  They had to play a college style game rushing the ball close to 40 times for them to win.  That's not going to work against any sort of good team.  Cam Newton may be 2-6, but Cam Newton can throw the ball 30 times and still get a W, Tim Tebow doesn't have that ability.
do it

Re: What will Tebow be the NFL equivalent of?
« Reply #102 on: November 07, 2011, 11:37:12 AM »

Offline indeedproceed

  • In The Rafters
  • James Naismith
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 42585
  • Tommy Points: 2756
  • You ain't the boss of the freakin' bedclothes.
Still not a starting QB in the NFL.


Team won because of the rushing game (he was a part of that) and the defense picking off three passes.  (a punt return for a TD also helps)


Tebow is a football player.  He might be an NFL level football player, but not at QB. 


And since you wanted to compare him to Newton

Besides Newtons rushing yards and TD, he has been a good passer for a rookie.

2393 yards.  11 tds and 9 ints.  60.6% completion rate.  87.1 QB rating.


Tebow for his career (6 starts)

1190 yards, 11 TDs and 4 ints.  48% completions rate.  81 QB rating. 

That completion percentage is well below average for an NFL QB. 
But the more important stat is wins and losses and Cam is 2-6.  I like Cam. I like Tebow too.
When you're projected a young player's individual future potential wins and losses matter very little.

If Denver's defense doesn't recover a fumble in OT against the Dolphins (whereupon Tebow went 3 yards in 3 downs) and instead they go down the filed and their kicker kicks a FG does that change your evaluation of Tebow because its a "loss" instead of a win?
All true. I would say yes, because I'm superstitious

John Elway: So you're saying, despite all empirical evidence otherwise, we should keep playing the kid? You're saying it doesn't matter how bad he throws the ball, how poorly he reads defenses, or how dangerously loose his grasp on our playbook is, we should still keep on playing Tim Tebow, because good things seem to happen when we play Tim Tebow?

eja: Yes! Yes a thousand times!

"You've gotta respect a 15-percent 3-point shooter. A guy
like that is always lethal." - Evan 'The God' Turner

Re: What will Tebow be the NFL equivalent of?
« Reply #103 on: November 07, 2011, 11:41:00 AM »

Online Donoghus

  • Global Moderator
  • Walter Brown
  • ********************************
  • Posts: 32687
  • Tommy Points: 1732
  • What a Pub Should Be
After this coming week's game against the Chiefs, he has the Jets & Chargers.

It's then that I think we'll have a better grasp of things.


2010 CB Historical Draft - Best Overall Team

Re: What will Tebow be the NFL equivalent of?
« Reply #104 on: November 07, 2011, 12:57:49 PM »

Offline Eja117

  • NCE
  • Bill Sharman
  • *******************
  • Posts: 19274
  • Tommy Points: 1254
Still not a starting QB in the NFL.


Team won because of the rushing game (he was a part of that) and the defense picking off three passes.  (a punt return for a TD also helps)


Tebow is a football player.  He might be an NFL level football player, but not at QB. 


And since you wanted to compare him to Newton

Besides Newtons rushing yards and TD, he has been a good passer for a rookie.

2393 yards.  11 tds and 9 ints.  60.6% completion rate.  87.1 QB rating.


Tebow for his career (6 starts)

1190 yards, 11 TDs and 4 ints.  48% completions rate.  81 QB rating. 

That completion percentage is well below average for an NFL QB. 
But the more important stat is wins and losses and Cam is 2-6.  I like Cam. I like Tebow too.
When you're projected a young player's individual future potential wins and losses matter very little.

If Denver's defense doesn't recover a fumble in OT against the Dolphins (whereupon Tebow went 3 yards in 3 downs) and instead they go down the filed and their kicker kicks a FG does that change your evaluation of Tebow because its a "loss" instead of a win?
All true. I would say yes, because I'm superstitious

John Elway: So you're saying, despite all empirical evidence otherwise, we should keep playing the kid? You're saying it doesn't matter how bad he throws the ball, how poorly he reads defenses, or how dangerously loose his grasp on our playbook is, we should still keep on playing Tim Tebow, because good things seem to happen when we play Tim Tebow?

eja: Yes! Yes a thousand times!
While I would have liked a reference to "as long as he keeps winning" I would have to say this  is generally a true and accurate summation of my position.

I'm not going to say I'm not biased