Author Topic: Baby to the Spurs  (Read 23868 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

Re: Baby to the Spurs
« Reply #105 on: July 06, 2009, 09:53:19 AM »

Offline Roy Hobbs

  • In The Rafters
  • The Natural
  • *********************************
  • Posts: 33333
  • Tommy Points: 6430
  • Doc could learn a thing or two from Norman Dale
I think we'll match.  A $5mil contract is good to have on the books.  We can use him in a trade at the deadline if we need to.

A 5 million dollar contract on the books isn't a great thing if you get back a 3 million dollar player...

Right.  Also, a $5 million per season, 3 year deal is of course more tradeable than a $5 million per season, 5 year deal.  A lot of times, it's the length of a contract that makes a player untradeable.

All the negativity in this town sucks. It sucks, and it stinks, and it sucks. - Rick Pitino

Portland CrotoNats:  2009 CB Draft Champions

Re: Baby to the Spurs
« Reply #106 on: July 06, 2009, 10:07:05 AM »

Offline EJPLAYA

  • NCE
  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3816
  • Tommy Points: 127
I think we'll match.  A $5mil contract is good to have on the books.  We can use him in a trade at the deadline if we need to.

A 5 million dollar contract on the books isn't a great thing if you get back a 3 million dollar player...

That's what you think he's worth.  Not sure what the Celtics think.

If/when they offer him 5 years at the MLE you will see what the Celtics think. They consider 3 years MLE match, but no way Danny gives him 5 years MLE. You just don't do that for a guy with so many question marks.

Re: Baby to the Spurs
« Reply #107 on: July 06, 2009, 10:18:13 AM »

Offline Fafnir

  • Bill Russell
  • ******************************
  • Posts: 30863
  • Tommy Points: 1330
I think we'll match.  A $5mil contract is good to have on the books.  We can use him in a trade at the deadline if we need to.
The idea that its okay to overpay a player because having expiring contracts is occasionally valuable is crazy. Teams that don't overpay are the ones that can take on the money to get steals in the trade market.

Re: Baby to the Spurs
« Reply #108 on: July 06, 2009, 12:08:49 PM »

Offline Scalablob990

  • Jaylen Brown
  • Posts: 715
  • Tommy Points: 83
  • The REAL Pau Gasol
if baby walks..boston needs another big on the frontline to play behind KG. Scal is more of a shooting forward and we need another banger inside. i also dont think the spurs offer him their MLE. if it is minutes then that might be his reason. but i expect anything 4 mil and under boston will match. they need baby to back up KG. Scal cannot do this

ride it out until Powe is healthy.

in a perfect world...danny would offer leon league min. and powe would be ready by january. then you can deal scal and tony at the trade deadline for whatever you need
Not even god can make that happen right now. The deal will also bring us something rewarding like a decent player or a 1st round pick.  :( If only.....
True Celtic = Leon Powe

Bring back the show!!!!

Re: Baby to the Spurs
« Reply #109 on: July 06, 2009, 12:23:22 PM »

Offline toinewalka

  • Jrue Holiday
  • Posts: 382
  • Tommy Points: 18
Quote
I think we'll match.  A $5mil contract is good to have on the books.  We can use him in a trade at the deadline if we need to.

The idea that its okay to overpay a player because having expiring contracts is occasionally valuable is crazy. Teams that don't overpay are the ones that can take on the money to get steals in the trade market.

You're right, this makes no sense.  Teams want contracts that expire at the end of the year for guys that they can let go of and not worry about resigning.  This wouldn't work with a young guy like Davis that is going to get more than a year.  Also, to spend any amount of money on a guy for the C's that they are not planning on needing during their run this year is useless.  We have some chips to trade if need be, and if they match on Davis it's ONLY because they see him helping this year.

Re: Baby to the Spurs
« Reply #110 on: July 06, 2009, 12:26:15 PM »

Offline Vermont Green

  • K.C. Jones
  • *************
  • Posts: 13600
  • Tommy Points: 1025
It is hard for me to believe that Boston will match on Davis now that Wallace is booked.  Scal will be our #3 PF, get used to it.  (and this really isn't all that bad).

It sounds like the C's may get Grant Hill who will be small $$ and a perfect fit behind Pierce plus they will sign a vet Min 7 footer.  (and if not Grant Hill, then someone like Bruce Bowen).

The roster will not be perfect but it will be darn good.

Re: Baby to the Spurs
« Reply #111 on: July 06, 2009, 12:34:48 PM »

Offline Casperian

  • Ray Allen
  • ***
  • Posts: 3501
  • Tommy Points: 545
This is probably the saddest day of my fan-life since the Lakers won their third title in a row in 2002.

For real?  Is it personality-motivated or do you hate Sheed's game and love Baby's?

If it's the latter, I have to disagree.  Baby rebounds a little, shoots a lot, makes a little and he's set to make a lot of money. If the Spurs are signing him, it means they aren't signing McDyess, and that makes me happy.

And Sheed is a good rebounder and doesn´t shoot too much? Yeah, right.

I´ve lost all my confidence in Danny Ainge.

In fact, I want him fired, if this is true.

LOL You're hilarious! Really, stop. You're killing me over here. I'm giving you a TP for that one.

Back at you.  :-\
In the summer of 2017, I predicted this team would not win a championship for the next 10 years.

3 down, 7 to go.

Re: Baby to the Spurs
« Reply #112 on: July 06, 2009, 12:42:42 PM »

Offline BballTim

  • Dave Cowens
  • ***********************
  • Posts: 23724
  • Tommy Points: 1123

  Without reading all 8 pages of this, is there a real report of the Spurs offering Davis the full MLE? It seems pretty unlikely.