0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.
Pierce for 3!!!Eat it, NBA!
Also I'm sitting here imagining BBD and KG in the locker room watching the game, seeing Powe and Perk do work, a the while punching each other and throwing chairs just being pumped.
K, now that our first 3 options at starting PF are unavaiable, im encouraged despite of the absoulte total garbage(and probabale loss)...TOTAL garbage from these refs
Quote from: Roy Hobbs on March 06, 2009, 09:52:34 PMPierce for 3!!!Eat it, NBA!I just got legitimately pumped up watching Pierce's dot go in from the corner on the gamecast at work... this is almost sad, but still awesome.
Quote from: Fan from VT on March 06, 2009, 09:51:55 PMQuote from: Roy Hobbs on March 06, 2009, 09:22:18 PMQuote from: Fan from VT on March 06, 2009, 09:18:37 PMQuote from: Roy Hobbs on March 06, 2009, 09:14:07 PMRay and Rondo with 4 points combined, and KG out. Yet, we still have a lead. I'll take it (even if it should be more).Kind of misleading, Roy! Wouldn't it make more sense to just say "No points from Ray, KG out, we'll take it?" Eh... Rondo having 4 points isn't spectacular. I don't really think it was misleading. The point was that three of the four guys we count on to carry us have contributed very little tonight (and even Pierce is below his average). Yet, we're still winning. That ain't bad.Yeah, I'm just giving you a hard time. In general, I find statements like that misleading...like say that Pierce had 10 at the half, and then just saying "Well, Pierce, Ray, and Rondo have only combined for 14 points..." well, yeah, but Pierce has 10, rondo has 4 and ray zero. Why is Pierce part of that group?! 4 points in one half isn't too far off from Rondo's average.How about Ray and Rondo have combined for 12 second half points?
Quote from: Roy Hobbs on March 06, 2009, 09:22:18 PMQuote from: Fan from VT on March 06, 2009, 09:18:37 PMQuote from: Roy Hobbs on March 06, 2009, 09:14:07 PMRay and Rondo with 4 points combined, and KG out. Yet, we still have a lead. I'll take it (even if it should be more).Kind of misleading, Roy! Wouldn't it make more sense to just say "No points from Ray, KG out, we'll take it?" Eh... Rondo having 4 points isn't spectacular. I don't really think it was misleading. The point was that three of the four guys we count on to carry us have contributed very little tonight (and even Pierce is below his average). Yet, we're still winning. That ain't bad.Yeah, I'm just giving you a hard time. In general, I find statements like that misleading...like say that Pierce had 10 at the half, and then just saying "Well, Pierce, Ray, and Rondo have only combined for 14 points..." well, yeah, but Pierce has 10, rondo has 4 and ray zero. Why is Pierce part of that group?! 4 points in one half isn't too far off from Rondo's average.
Quote from: Fan from VT on March 06, 2009, 09:18:37 PMQuote from: Roy Hobbs on March 06, 2009, 09:14:07 PMRay and Rondo with 4 points combined, and KG out. Yet, we still have a lead. I'll take it (even if it should be more).Kind of misleading, Roy! Wouldn't it make more sense to just say "No points from Ray, KG out, we'll take it?" Eh... Rondo having 4 points isn't spectacular. I don't really think it was misleading. The point was that three of the four guys we count on to carry us have contributed very little tonight (and even Pierce is below his average). Yet, we're still winning. That ain't bad.
Quote from: Roy Hobbs on March 06, 2009, 09:14:07 PMRay and Rondo with 4 points combined, and KG out. Yet, we still have a lead. I'll take it (even if it should be more).Kind of misleading, Roy! Wouldn't it make more sense to just say "No points from Ray, KG out, we'll take it?"
Ray and Rondo with 4 points combined, and KG out. Yet, we still have a lead. I'll take it (even if it should be more).
hmm ...wally getting a rebound over Powe is unnacceptable