I just wonder how you can really know whether or not he is a good coach just because a young hawk team has gotten hot and look like a completely different team at home. And how can you definitely say that he is solely to blame for the losses in this series? They've won by 20 just about every game at home. Both teams looked completely different in Atlanta, almost every hawk shot has gone in, almost every call seems to have gone their way, and the Celtics simply aren't playing as good defensively, nor are their shooting percentages as high in Atlanta. Does that really fall on Doc? Has he just decided to be a bad coach in Atlanta, because he used to play there? And just because Doc never led a team to the finals, does that mean that he wasn't a good player? And, certainly, you can not really believe that never winning a championship as a player equates to never winning a championship as a coach. Look at Red. Did he ever lead his team to a championship? No, actually he wasn't even a good player. Yet, he is the best coach of all time in the NBA. So, I think your argument falters a bit with Doc's playing career.
As far as him not being successful as a coach in the NBA, I think maybe at this point your standards are too high. He took a pretty mediocre magic team to the playoffs the year he won COY. Besides that, he has had miserable, young teams. I'm not sure if Red could even get those teams far into the playoffs. So I guess we disagree on what success means and how to quantify it. In which case, fine. We probably won't ever agree on Doc's coaching unless, of course, he wins a championship. Will he still not be good enough if that happens?
And yes, he does lack experience in the playoffs. But then again, his teams have been awful. But like I said, if they don't win this series, I give him a pass, based on inexperience in the playoffs and coaching this team, along with some other crazy twists of fate and unforeseeables. If that happens again next year, then fine, get someone else. It helps that he is so darn likable, but I honestly think the is a good coach for this team, and can be a great coach in the league. Do his players help him this year? Of course. But how can you really say that he hasn't helped his platers this year? The big three are playing more like a team than any of their teams have ever played. You have to give some of the credit to Doc as a person and as a coach.
For now, can we please just wait to see how they do tomorrow?
The real question here is that is really hard to quantify -- how do you measure the relative impact of a coach in basketball. Like manager "win-shares" from baseball.
Fair enough on Rivers. You would agree, though, that he has never been really successful, right? His coaching teams have never won a playoff series and in his playing days his teams were never championship caliber.
Note: I would define real winning in a conventional wisdom sort of way -- make it to the NBA finals. I could even be stricter and say "win a championship", but that seems a bit too limiting.
He may or may not be a good coach, but you would concede that he lacks any experience with real winning either at the coaching or playing level, right? Again, that does not make him a bad coach, but I think it is important to acknowledge just how inexperienced he is with even getting close to a championship (that is true for most NBA players and many coaches, but that does not deny its truth in his case).
So your argument is that he is a good coach for this team despite no tradition of real winning?
p.s. Winning will not mean Doc is a better coach any more than losing will mean he is a worse coach. My argument is that the problems the Celtics have had in this series are manifestations of Doc's general problems as a coach. The team may be good enough to mask them, but that doesn't mean they don't exist.
I'm sorry, but I disagree. To say he is a bad coach and everyone knows it is a huge generalization. I think that Doc is the right coach for this team right now... he is young, enthusiastic, patient, a former NBA star, etc, etc. While he may not be the best coach in the league, I personally think that he is a good one, and that he is good for the C's.
While we may disagree, don't say that everyone knows it and class me as the only Doc supporter and believer. That is a pretty strong statement coming from someone posting on a blog and not having any connection to the Celtics' franchise other than being a fan. And i don't doubt that you are a fan... you don't have to prove your fanhood... but to me, it is just sad when you dismiss the value of the head coach of the best team in the league and they haven't won or lost the series yet. Talk to me again after the game tomorrow.
While the losing in this series is frustrating, the problem is twofold:
1. Doc's terrible coaching is the "one big thing" everyone has worried about with the Celtics all year long. Like Memphis and free throw shooting in college basketball (the Sports Guy on ESPN.com had a long article or two about critical flaws arising at the worst possible time, like relief pitching with the '86 Red Sox). The question is not whether Doc is responsible for them losing the series, the question is how you think Doc has performed relative to, say, any coach in the playoffs in the Western Conference. Is there any coach that was in the Western Conference playoffs with a worse playoff track record than Doc Rivers? Even Avery Johnson made it to the finals once and Mike D'Antoni made it to the conference finals. And if there was an open position and those three guys were up for it, would YOU hire Doc? If so, why?
??
2. Even if the Celtics win this series, that doesn't prove everything was great all along. Unless this becomes the big learning experience, etc., etc., this demonstrates a critical design flaw. And more often than not, critical design flaws become, well, the reasons you lose rather than the thing you overcome. It is much more frequent that a design flaw takes down a team than the design flaw gets fixed in the playoffs. Even if the Celtics win this series, it will take a serious change for them to handle the Cavs, let alone the Pistons or Magic or whoever might await in the NBA Finals.
I want the Celtics to win. I really do. But Doc Rivers is not a good coach. Everyone knows it and this playoff series has exposed it yet again. If the Celtics win it will be despite Rivers, not because of him.
Maybe you made a fair point, but here is the way to think about it. Under what circumstances WOULD you say Doc should be fired? If they win 66 games next year and lose in the first round of the playoffs again?
What do you think is the standard?
I know that when you lose games like these, it may seem like the end of the world, and therefore we need to justify our feelings of hurt, frustration, disappointment, and fear by pointing fingers and figuring out who to blame. Things like the poll on who is to blame for the loss on this site as well as other posts on people chiming in on who they blame for the loss really disappoint me, because I feel that there is no reason for it and if just makes things worse.
All the Doc haters come out in full force after every loss, as if they were hoping to lose just so they could be justified in bashing Doc. But to me, when people blame Doc, as well as other players on the team, it is almost as if someone took a shot at my family. I feel like I need to defend them, even if it is that annoying cousin that gets under everyone's skin. The Celtics are my favorite team in the whole world, and it hurts when people take shots at them, especially people from the Celtic family, the fans-- the extended family of the C's. Then again, I guess only the family is allowed to take shots at the family (an no, I am not talking about the mob-- let's leave that talk to the refs), but it still hurts when people jump on people like Doc right away.
We all know that the players love Doc, that Doc has helped shape this team into the best defensive team in the league, that Doc is one of the top coaches for executing plays after the timeout.
We all know that the Celtics have been the best team in the league all year. Instead of trying to place blame, let's remember that the Celtics are the better team in this series, and that every game in Boston has been a blow out.
I'm just as mad and worried as everyone else, but pointing fingers helps nothing. Let's pull together as a team, as a family, and get past this. Let's go Celtics!
that post is worth your first TP! I 100% agree that people are just waiting to justify their earlier opinions and throw the blame 100% at Doc, when its not fait, everyone involved is accountable, including Doc. Its almost the Sour Grapes phenomenon, its ok they didn't win, I knew Doc was bad all along type thing - get over it people, its time to support the team, from 1-12, from Danny to Doc to Wyc to even god forbid lucky =)
Thanks, by the way, for my first TP! Let's go C's!
Ok, let's say they do lose this series, which I highly doubt and in which case, fire doc threats and threads will be put to rest for a little while. In my opinion, I think you have to say to yourself, what a great season. Totally disappointing postseason, but this is this team's first postseason together. That isn't much of an excuse, but, assuming the team doesn't change drastically next year, you have to take that into account. And, like I said, while it will be infuriating if they lose this series, you can't completely jump ship, hire a new coach, and make this team, who has built so much chemistry have to start over again with a new coach and a new system. Now, if this does in fact happen next year, where they lose in the first round again after a loss in the first round this year, then yes, I think it is time to look in a new direction with a new coach.
But honestly, I don't even like talking about this right now, and I don't think people should be talking about this right now, because I don't want to jinx the Celtics. Which is why I get frustrated with all the fire doc chants right now, when we still have a series to win, and a Championship to contend for. Stop jumping ship! Like Doc said, don't jump! Giving up on the coach at this point is almost like giving up on the team, and that is an unfortunate and negative way to look at things at this point. But this happens after every loss. When we win tomorrow, all will be right with the world again.