It has been really difficult for me to reason out Indy's thought process over the last week or so.
First, there was the report that they wouldn't let Boston speak with Paul George to determine his willingness to re-sign, despite the fact that such a conversation could have made us more willing raise our offer. As it is, we had to assume that he was just a rental and negotiate accordingly.
Now, they impose an artificial deadline on themselves before taking a lower offer. Why? I'm sure the OKC offer would have still been available a week from now.
The report is that Indy didn't want to make a powerhouse in the East. Again, why? Indy isn't competing anytime soon anyway. Cleveland and Boston both decline after a few years - the former because of Lebron's eventual decline, the latter because of money. When they come down, ideally you're ready to play again. So what's the problem?
Rather than dealing with Cleveland or Boston or even LAL, they decided to take an overpaid SG who I'm not convinced is even a positive asset and a mediocre prospect big for their star forward. I don't get any of this.