Proposal 2017 Nets pick (if 3-4 position) - for Gordon or Saric?

[crimson_stallion]

Need an option od "neither" because my answer to this would be "Good lord no..."

Assuming Fultz goes #1, I'd take Tatum or Ball over Gordon/Saric all day, every day. 

While dropping to #4 is possible, the probability of that happening is so incredibly low that I'd barely even bother preparing for it.

Gordon's potential is pretty limited - he'll never be a star.  Saric's potential is probalby higher, but I still don't think he'll be anything that special.  Tatum could be a major star - sky high potential. 

[Tr1boy]

If we are dealing the 3rd or 4th pick I think we can do better than Gordon or Saric.

Maybe... But depends on who is available.

There is no conclusion Tatum is going to be better than Saric or Gordon.  De aaron fox?  No indication

Ball is an absolute nightmare bc of his dad. Endless distraction... 

Other than Fultz who are these top end prsopects? Its a draft with lots of depth (wide)...  But you cant say definitely one stands out from another imo

[CELTICSofBOSTON]

Need an option od "neither" because my answer to this would be "Good lord no..."

Assuming Fultz goes #1, I'd take Tatum or Ball over Gordon/Saric all day, every day. 

While dropping to #4 is possible, the probability of that happening is so incredibly low that I'd barely even bother preparing for it.

Gordon's potential is pretty limited - he'll never be a star.  Saric's potential is probalby higher, but I still don't think he'll be anything that special.  Tatum could be a major star - sky high potential.

Actually we have a higher chance at getting the number 4 pick than we have of getting any other pick.

There is a 25% chance we get the number 1 pick and roughly 36% chance of getting the number 4 pick.

[Darío SpanishFan]

I wouldn't do any, but Saric made me wonder about the possibility for a second.

[Ilikesports17]

Nope.

#4 for Saric makes me hesitate for a moment, but its a hard no in the end.

[moiso]

If we are dealing the 3rd or 4th pick I think we can do better than Gordon or Saric.

You think?  Haha. 

[Tr1boy]

Need an option od "neither" because my answer to this would be "Good lord no..."

Assuming Fultz goes #1, I'd take Tatum or Ball over Gordon/Saric all day, every day. 

While dropping to #4 is possible, the probability of that happening is so incredibly low that I'd barely even bother preparing for it.

Gordon's potential is pretty limited - he'll never be a star.  Saric's potential is probalby higher, but I still don't think he'll be anything that special.  Tatum could be a major star - sky high potential.

His defense will never be as good as Gordon. Saric is 6'10 and can be classified as a legit PF

What is tatum?

Too many games he scored 2-4 pts by the end of the 1st half. Not intense enough defensively..

Look at james young. More talented offensively than Crowder.  No playing time under cbs

[moiso]

Need an option od "neither" because my answer to this would be "Good lord no..."

Assuming Fultz goes #1, I'd take Tatum or Ball over Gordon/Saric all day, every day. 

While dropping to #4 is possible, the probability of that happening is so incredibly low that I'd barely even bother preparing for it.

Gordon's potential is pretty limited - he'll never be a star.  Saric's potential is probalby higher, but I still don't think he'll be anything that special.  Tatum could be a major star - sky high potential.

His defense will never be as good as Gordon. Saric is 6'10 and can be classified as a legit PF

What is tatum?

Too many games he scored 2-4 pts by the end of the 1st half. Not intense enough defensively..

Look at james young. More talented offensively than Crowder.  No playing time under cbs

Gordon came out of college with a rep as someone who had the potential to be a very good defender.  I don't think he's a very good defender, though.

[Darío SpanishFan]

Look at james young. More talented offensively than Crowder.

Do you really think so?    Offensive talent is not just waiting behind the line for a good pass to shoot (and Young has a career 27,5% from deep).

This is ridiculous, no offense intended.

[Tr1boy]

Need an option od "neither" because my answer to this would be "Good lord no..."

Assuming Fultz goes #1, I'd take Tatum or Ball over Gordon/Saric all day, every day. 

While dropping to #4 is possible, the probability of that happening is so incredibly low that I'd barely even bother preparing for it.

Gordon's potential is pretty limited - he'll never be a star.  Saric's potential is probalby higher, but I still don't think he'll be anything that special.  Tatum could be a major star - sky high potential.

His defense will never be as good as Gordon. Saric is 6'10 and can be classified as a legit PF

What is tatum?

Too many games he scored 2-4 pts by the end of the 1st half. Not intense enough defensively..

Look at james young. More talented offensively than Crowder.  No playing time under cbs

Gordon came out of college with a rep as someone who had the potential to be a very good defender. I don't think he's a very good defender, though.

Really? 

Aaron Gordon defensive stops
https://youtu.be/d3n0lhe01ok

[Tr1boy]

Look at james young. More talented offensively than Crowder.

Do you really think so?    Offensive talent is not just waiting behind the line for a good pass to shoot (and Young has a career 27,5% from deep).

This is ridiculous, no offense intended.

You think Crowder is naturally more talented offensively than Young? 

[Darío SpanishFan]

Look at james young. More talented offensively than Crowder.

Do you really think so?    Offensive talent is not just waiting behind the line for a good pass to shoot (and Young has a career 27,5% from deep).

This is ridiculous, no offense intended.

You think Crowder is naturally more talented offensively than Young?

From what I've seen in three NBA seasons from Young, no doubt. He can't shoot (27,5% from deep), he can't dribble (9 FTs attempted this whole year), he has doubts with the ball, he doesn't show desire...

Sorry, I haven't seen James Young's talent these three years. And neither has Ainge, who declined his fourth year option at a very low cost.

[Tr1boy]

Look at james young. More talented offensively than Crowder.

Do you really think so?    Offensive talent is not just waiting behind the line for a good pass to shoot (and Young has a career 27,5% from deep).

This is ridiculous, no offense intended.

You think Crowder is naturally more talented offensively than Young?

From what I've seen in three NBA seasons from Young, no doubt. He can't shoot (27,5% from deep), he can't dribble (9 FTs attempted this whole year), he has doubts with the ball, he doesn't show desire...

Sorry, I haven't seen James Young's talent these three years. And neither has Ainge, who declined his fourth year option at a very low cost.

Well Young freshman year at Kentucky proved otherwise.  He helped Kentucky to the finals

This is my point... He flashed his offensive skills in college ..but at the nba level could not beat out a more intense player like Crowder nor Brown

Cbs is spoiled after having horses like Smart, Crowder, Rozier. intense, all out type players....  If you are one second passive , especially on the defensive end... You wont get min on the floor

[Ilikesports17]

Need an option od "neither" because my answer to this would be "Good lord no..."

Assuming Fultz goes #1, I'd take Tatum or Ball over Gordon/Saric all day, every day. 

While dropping to #4 is possible, the probability of that happening is so incredibly low that I'd barely even bother preparing for it.

Gordon's potential is pretty limited - he'll never be a star.  Saric's potential is probalby higher, but I still don't think he'll be anything that special.  Tatum could be a major star - sky high potential.

His defense will never be as good as Gordon. Saric is 6'10 and can be classified as a legit PF

What is tatum?

Too many games he scored 2-4 pts by the end of the 1st half. Not intense enough defensively..

Look at james young. More talented offensively than Crowder.  No playing time under cbs

that is such a dumb critique.

He scored in double figures in all but 3 games.

[kozlodoev]

No.

So you rather have jackson or tatum?

I'd rather have a bag of chips and anyone you could draft with the 4th pick.